One-year evaluation of automated insulin delivery systems in adults with type 1 diabetes.

IF 3.2 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in digital health Pub Date : 2025-07-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1596188
Pedro Pujante, Ana Victoria García, Elsa Villa-Fernández, Miguel García-Villarino, Tomás González-Vidal, Lucía Díaz-Naya, Gala Gutiérrez Buey, Brenda Veiguela, Diego Rivas-Otero, Edelmiro Menéndez-Torre, Elías Delgado, Jessica Ares, Carmen Lambert
{"title":"One-year evaluation of automated insulin delivery systems in adults with type 1 diabetes.","authors":"Pedro Pujante, Ana Victoria García, Elsa Villa-Fernández, Miguel García-Villarino, Tomás González-Vidal, Lucía Díaz-Naya, Gala Gutiérrez Buey, Brenda Veiguela, Diego Rivas-Otero, Edelmiro Menéndez-Torre, Elías Delgado, Jessica Ares, Carmen Lambert","doi":"10.3389/fdgth.2025.1596188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study evaluates the effectiveness of four commercially available automated insulin delivery (AID) systems in routine clinical practice for type 1 diabetes management and compares their first-year outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials: </strong>This retrospective study (October 2020-October 2023) included glucometric data from type 1 diabetes patients collected from the Asturias Automatic Insulin Devices Registry. People with type 1 diabetes using four different AID systems [Minimed™780G (MM780G), Accu-Chek® Insight-Diabeloop (DBLG), Tandem-Control-IQ, and Ypsopump Cambridge HCL-app (Cam-APS)] were included in the study. Primary outcomes were glycaemic control after one year. Secondary outcomes compared the results between the four systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>174 patients (60: MM780G, 45: DBLG, 30: Control-IQ, 39: Cam-APS), aged 18-73, predominantly women, were enrolled. At baseline, glycemic control, measured by the achievement of the international consensus targets [TBR (Time Below Range) <4%; TIR(Time in Range) >70% and TAR (Time Above Range) <25%] was only met by 9.72% of participants, while after 1 year of an AID system use, it improved to more than 52%. When comparing between systems, TIR improved significantly after 1 year in all systems. However, Control-IQ did not show improvement in mean glucose and Glucose management index (GMI) and only users of DBLG showed improvement in coefficient of variation (CV). MM780G users achieved the best results after 12 months in mean glucose, TIR and GMI. However, their baseline situation was also better than that of the other groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study confirms that, after 12 months of routine clinical use, the use of commercially available automated insulin delivery (AID) systems significantly improves glycemic control in individuals with type 1 diabetes. However, the degree of improvement varies depending on the specific system used.These findings underscore the importance of selecting and optimizing AID systems individually to maximize clinical benefits in type 1 diabetes management.</p>","PeriodicalId":73078,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in digital health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1596188"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12259683/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1596188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study evaluates the effectiveness of four commercially available automated insulin delivery (AID) systems in routine clinical practice for type 1 diabetes management and compares their first-year outcomes.

Materials: This retrospective study (October 2020-October 2023) included glucometric data from type 1 diabetes patients collected from the Asturias Automatic Insulin Devices Registry. People with type 1 diabetes using four different AID systems [Minimed™780G (MM780G), Accu-Chek® Insight-Diabeloop (DBLG), Tandem-Control-IQ, and Ypsopump Cambridge HCL-app (Cam-APS)] were included in the study. Primary outcomes were glycaemic control after one year. Secondary outcomes compared the results between the four systems.

Results: 174 patients (60: MM780G, 45: DBLG, 30: Control-IQ, 39: Cam-APS), aged 18-73, predominantly women, were enrolled. At baseline, glycemic control, measured by the achievement of the international consensus targets [TBR (Time Below Range) <4%; TIR(Time in Range) >70% and TAR (Time Above Range) <25%] was only met by 9.72% of participants, while after 1 year of an AID system use, it improved to more than 52%. When comparing between systems, TIR improved significantly after 1 year in all systems. However, Control-IQ did not show improvement in mean glucose and Glucose management index (GMI) and only users of DBLG showed improvement in coefficient of variation (CV). MM780G users achieved the best results after 12 months in mean glucose, TIR and GMI. However, their baseline situation was also better than that of the other groups.

Discussion: This study confirms that, after 12 months of routine clinical use, the use of commercially available automated insulin delivery (AID) systems significantly improves glycemic control in individuals with type 1 diabetes. However, the degree of improvement varies depending on the specific system used.These findings underscore the importance of selecting and optimizing AID systems individually to maximize clinical benefits in type 1 diabetes management.

1型糖尿病成人自动胰岛素输送系统的一年评估
本研究评估了四种市售的自动胰岛素输送(AID)系统在常规临床实践中对1型糖尿病管理的有效性,并比较了它们第一年的结果。材料:这项回顾性研究(2020年10月- 2023年10月)包括从阿斯图里亚斯自动胰岛素装置登记处收集的1型糖尿病患者的血糖测量数据。使用四种不同AID系统[Minimed™780G (MM780G)、Accu-Chek®insight - diabelloop (DBLG)、Tandem-Control-IQ和Ypsopump Cambridge hdl -app (Cam-APS)]的1型糖尿病患者被纳入研究。主要结局是1年后血糖控制。次要结果比较四个系统的结果。结果:174例患者(60例:MM780G, 45例:DBLG, 30例:Control-IQ, 39例:Cam-APS),年龄18-73岁,主要为女性。基线时,血糖控制,通过达到国际共识目标[TBR(时间低于范围)70%和TAR(时间高于范围)]来测量。讨论:本研究证实,在常规临床使用12个月后,使用市售的自动胰岛素输送(AID)系统可显著改善1型糖尿病患者的血糖控制。然而,改进的程度取决于所使用的具体系统。这些发现强调了在1型糖尿病管理中选择和优化AID系统以最大化临床效益的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信