A data-driven approach to forest health assessment through multivariate analysis and machine learning techniques.

IF 4.3 2区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Raja Waqar Ahmed Khan, Hamayun Shaheen, Muhammad Ejaz Ul Islam Dar, Tariq Habib, Muhammad Manzoor, Syed Waseem Gillani, Abeer Al-Andal, John Oluwafemi Ayoola, Muhammad Waheed
{"title":"A data-driven approach to forest health assessment through multivariate analysis and machine learning techniques.","authors":"Raja Waqar Ahmed Khan, Hamayun Shaheen, Muhammad Ejaz Ul Islam Dar, Tariq Habib, Muhammad Manzoor, Syed Waseem Gillani, Abeer Al-Andal, John Oluwafemi Ayoola, Muhammad Waheed","doi":"10.1186/s12870-025-06937-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Himalayan forests are fragile, rich in biodiversity, and face increasing threats from anthropogenic pressures and climate change. Assessing their health is critical for sustainable forest management. This study integrated ecological indicators (tree density, size, regeneration, deforestation, slope, grazing, and erosion) with machine learning (ML) to classify forest health and identify key drivers across 37 Western Himalayan sites. Principal component analysis (PCA) reduced data dimensionality, highlighting major ecological gradients. K-means clustering was used to group forests into three distinct classes based on ecological characteristics, due to its efficiency in identifying natural patterns within multivariate data. ML models, including Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) were trained and validated using an 80:20 train-test split and 5-fold cross-validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PCA revealed that elevation, disturbance, and regeneration explained 74.3% variance. Forest health varied across sites, with 10 categorized as healthy, 19 as moderate, and 8 as unhealthy. Forest regeneration was highly skewed (2.67) and leptokurtic (9.8), with few sites showing high seedling abundance, while deforestation (mean = 294 stumps ha<sup>-1</sup>) indicated uneven human impact. Among ML models, RF showed the best performance with a mean accuracy of 0.83, Kappa 0.87, and balanced accuracy 0.88. SVM followed with 0.75 accuracy, Kappa 0.70, and balanced accuracy 0.81. DT performed lowest with 0.66 accuracy and Kappa 0.45. Cross-validation confirmed RF's highest mean accuracy (90.3%), followed by SVM (88.1%) and DT (65.1%). RF-based feature importance analysis showed tree DBH, height, regeneration rate, soil erosion, and tree density as key ecological drivers of forest health.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights ML-driven classification as a precise, scalable, and objective tool for large-scale forest health assessments. Conservation efforts should prioritize degraded forests through afforestation, slope stabilization, controlled grazing, erosion management, and continuous ecosystem monitoring. Future studies should integrate high-resolution remote sensing (e.g., Landsat, Sentinel-2) and climate datasets (e.g., temperature, precipitation, and drought indices) to enhance predictive capabilities and support long-term forest management planning. The findings underscore the value of data-driven approaches, establishing machine learning as an effective tool to enhance forest monitoring and support evidence-based forest conservation and management in the Himalayas.</p>","PeriodicalId":9198,"journal":{"name":"BMC Plant Biology","volume":"25 1","pages":"915"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12261679/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Plant Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-025-06937-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Himalayan forests are fragile, rich in biodiversity, and face increasing threats from anthropogenic pressures and climate change. Assessing their health is critical for sustainable forest management. This study integrated ecological indicators (tree density, size, regeneration, deforestation, slope, grazing, and erosion) with machine learning (ML) to classify forest health and identify key drivers across 37 Western Himalayan sites. Principal component analysis (PCA) reduced data dimensionality, highlighting major ecological gradients. K-means clustering was used to group forests into three distinct classes based on ecological characteristics, due to its efficiency in identifying natural patterns within multivariate data. ML models, including Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) were trained and validated using an 80:20 train-test split and 5-fold cross-validation.

Results: PCA revealed that elevation, disturbance, and regeneration explained 74.3% variance. Forest health varied across sites, with 10 categorized as healthy, 19 as moderate, and 8 as unhealthy. Forest regeneration was highly skewed (2.67) and leptokurtic (9.8), with few sites showing high seedling abundance, while deforestation (mean = 294 stumps ha-1) indicated uneven human impact. Among ML models, RF showed the best performance with a mean accuracy of 0.83, Kappa 0.87, and balanced accuracy 0.88. SVM followed with 0.75 accuracy, Kappa 0.70, and balanced accuracy 0.81. DT performed lowest with 0.66 accuracy and Kappa 0.45. Cross-validation confirmed RF's highest mean accuracy (90.3%), followed by SVM (88.1%) and DT (65.1%). RF-based feature importance analysis showed tree DBH, height, regeneration rate, soil erosion, and tree density as key ecological drivers of forest health.

Conclusions: This study highlights ML-driven classification as a precise, scalable, and objective tool for large-scale forest health assessments. Conservation efforts should prioritize degraded forests through afforestation, slope stabilization, controlled grazing, erosion management, and continuous ecosystem monitoring. Future studies should integrate high-resolution remote sensing (e.g., Landsat, Sentinel-2) and climate datasets (e.g., temperature, precipitation, and drought indices) to enhance predictive capabilities and support long-term forest management planning. The findings underscore the value of data-driven approaches, establishing machine learning as an effective tool to enhance forest monitoring and support evidence-based forest conservation and management in the Himalayas.

通过多变量分析和机器学习技术进行森林健康评估的数据驱动方法。
背景:喜马拉雅森林是脆弱的,具有丰富的生物多样性,并面临着越来越多的来自人为压力和气候变化的威胁。评估它们的健康状况对可持续森林管理至关重要。本研究将生态指标(树木密度、大小、再生、森林砍伐、坡度、放牧和侵蚀)与机器学习(ML)相结合,对37个西喜马拉雅地区的森林健康状况进行分类,并确定关键驱动因素。主成分分析(PCA)降低了数据维数,突出了主要的生态梯度。由于K-means聚类在多变量数据中识别自然模式的效率高,因此基于生态特征将森林分为三个不同的类别。ML模型,包括决策树(DT),随机森林(RF)和支持向量机(SVM),使用80:20训练测试分割和5倍交叉验证进行训练和验证。结果:PCA显示海拔、扰动和再生解释了74.3%的方差。不同地点的森林健康状况各不相同,10个被归类为健康,19个被归类为中等,8个被归类为不健康。森林更新呈高度倾斜(2.67)和倾斜(9.8),苗木丰度高的地点很少,而森林砍伐(平均为294个树桩/ 1)表明人类影响不均衡。在ML模型中,RF表现最好,平均准确率为0.83,Kappa为0.87,平衡准确率为0.88。SVM精度为0.75,Kappa为0.70,平衡精度为0.81。DT的准确率最低,为0.66,Kappa为0.45。交叉验证结果表明,RF的平均准确率最高(90.3%),其次是SVM(88.1%)和DT(65.1%)。基于rf的特征重要性分析表明,树木胸径、高度、更新速度、土壤侵蚀和树木密度是森林健康的关键生态驱动因素。结论:这项研究强调了机器学习驱动的分类是一种精确、可扩展和客观的大规模森林健康评估工具。保护工作应通过植树造林、边坡稳定、控制放牧、侵蚀管理和持续的生态系统监测来优先考虑退化的森林。未来的研究应整合高分辨率遥感(如Landsat、Sentinel-2)和气候数据集(如温度、降水和干旱指数),以增强预测能力并支持长期森林管理规划。研究结果强调了数据驱动方法的价值,将机器学习确立为加强喜马拉雅地区森林监测和支持基于证据的森林保护和管理的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Plant Biology
BMC Plant Biology 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
539
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Plant Biology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of plant biology, including molecular, cellular, tissue, organ and whole organism research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信