Dupilumab adverse reactions in eosinophilic esophagitis treatment: a Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database analysis.

IF 2.6 3区 医学
Kasey Bowyer, Austin R Swisher, Nancy Jiang, Jonathan Liang
{"title":"Dupilumab adverse reactions in eosinophilic esophagitis treatment: a Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database analysis.","authors":"Kasey Bowyer, Austin R Swisher, Nancy Jiang, Jonathan Liang","doi":"10.1093/dote/doaf055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dupilumab, the first biologic approved for eosinophilic esophagitis treatment (EoE-tx) in 2022, demonstrated favorable safety in phase-III clinical trials. However, real-world dupilumab-associated adverse reactions (DARs) for EoE-tx are unknown. This study aims to evaluate DAR for EoE-tx using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System. FDA Adverse Event Reporting System was queried for DAR between 2022Q1 and 2023Q4. Individual DARs (iDARs) were categorized and compared between treatment groups: EoE, asthma, atopic dermatitis, and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Logistic regression was used to predict serious DAR and outcomes, and zero-truncated negative binomial regression was used to predict the number of iDAR. There were 51,000 DAR observations; 1459 for EoE-tx with 103 (7.1%) serious reactions and 44 (3.0%) serious outcomes including 3 deaths. For EoE-tx, the mean iDAR was 3.68 [3.51, 3.85], and the iDAR incidence rate ratio among men receiving EoE-tx was 0.73 [0.65, 0.83]. EoE-tx average iDAR primarily included general (0.75 [0.70, 0.80]), injection-site (0.69 [0.63, 0.74]), dermatologic (0.51 [0.46, 0.55]), and gastrointestinal (0.24 [0.21, 0.27]) reactions. Adults ≥50 years had 1.97 [1.28, 2.99] higher odds for serious DAR compared to younger adults in EoE-tx. Overall, dupilumab demonstrated a favorable safety profile across all indications, with low rates of serious adverse events. For EoE-tx specifically, higher total iDAR rates were observed, driven largely by increased injection-site and gastrointestinal reactions compared to other indications. Additionally, women exhibited higher iDAR rates than men across all indications.</p>","PeriodicalId":54277,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":"38 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the Esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doaf055","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dupilumab, the first biologic approved for eosinophilic esophagitis treatment (EoE-tx) in 2022, demonstrated favorable safety in phase-III clinical trials. However, real-world dupilumab-associated adverse reactions (DARs) for EoE-tx are unknown. This study aims to evaluate DAR for EoE-tx using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System. FDA Adverse Event Reporting System was queried for DAR between 2022Q1 and 2023Q4. Individual DARs (iDARs) were categorized and compared between treatment groups: EoE, asthma, atopic dermatitis, and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Logistic regression was used to predict serious DAR and outcomes, and zero-truncated negative binomial regression was used to predict the number of iDAR. There were 51,000 DAR observations; 1459 for EoE-tx with 103 (7.1%) serious reactions and 44 (3.0%) serious outcomes including 3 deaths. For EoE-tx, the mean iDAR was 3.68 [3.51, 3.85], and the iDAR incidence rate ratio among men receiving EoE-tx was 0.73 [0.65, 0.83]. EoE-tx average iDAR primarily included general (0.75 [0.70, 0.80]), injection-site (0.69 [0.63, 0.74]), dermatologic (0.51 [0.46, 0.55]), and gastrointestinal (0.24 [0.21, 0.27]) reactions. Adults ≥50 years had 1.97 [1.28, 2.99] higher odds for serious DAR compared to younger adults in EoE-tx. Overall, dupilumab demonstrated a favorable safety profile across all indications, with low rates of serious adverse events. For EoE-tx specifically, higher total iDAR rates were observed, driven largely by increased injection-site and gastrointestinal reactions compared to other indications. Additionally, women exhibited higher iDAR rates than men across all indications.

Dupilumab在嗜酸性粒细胞性食管炎治疗中的不良反应:食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统数据库分析。
Dupilumab是2022年批准用于治疗嗜酸性粒细胞性食管炎(EoE-tx)的首个生物制剂,在iii期临床试验中显示出良好的安全性。然而,EoE-tx的实际dupilumumab相关不良反应(dar)尚不清楚。本研究旨在利用FDA不良事件报告系统评估EoE-tx的DAR。在2022Q1至2023Q4期间查询FDA不良事件报告系统的DAR。对治疗组之间的个体dar (idar)进行分类和比较:EoE、哮喘、特应性皮炎和慢性鼻窦炎合并鼻息肉。预测严重DAR及预后采用Logistic回归,预测iDAR数量采用零截断负二项回归。有51000个DAR观测;EoE-tx 1459例,103例(7.1%)严重反应,44例(3.0%)严重结局,包括3例死亡。EoE-tx的平均iDAR为3.68[3.51,3.85],接受EoE-tx的男性的iDAR发病率比为0.73[0.65,0.83]。EoE-tx平均iDAR主要包括一般反应(0.75[0.70,0.80])、注射部位反应(0.69[0.63,0.74])、皮肤反应(0.51[0.46,0.55])和胃肠道反应(0.24[0.21,0.27])。≥50岁的成年人在EoE-tx中发生严重DAR的几率比年轻人高1.97[1.28,2.99]。总体而言,dupilumab在所有适应症中表现出良好的安全性,严重不良事件发生率低。特别是对于EoE-tx,观察到更高的总iDAR率,主要是由于与其他适应症相比,注射部位和胃肠道反应增加。此外,在所有适应症中,女性的iDAR率高于男性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diseases of the Esophagus
Diseases of the Esophagus Medicine-Gastroenterology
自引率
7.70%
发文量
568
期刊介绍: Diseases of the Esophagus covers all aspects of the esophagus - etiology, investigation and diagnosis, and both medical and surgical treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信