Mariah L Robertson, Joseph Cofrancesco, Rachel B Levine
{"title":"Transforming individuals and institutions through competency-based faculty development.","authors":"Mariah L Robertson, Joseph Cofrancesco, Rachel B Levine","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2025.1621376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Faculty development (FD) is foundational to advancing the quality of health professions education and, by extension, the healthcare system. While FD has traditionally emphasized teaching, its scope now includes educational leadership, scholarship, and systems-level change. This Perspective argues for the adoption of competency-based FD frameworks to not only support individual educator growth but also catalyze institutional transformation. Aligning FD programming with established educator competencies fosters professional identity, enables targeted skill development, and legitimizes educational contributions in academic medicine. Drawing from global models-including frameworks from the United States, United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Lebanon-we illustrate how institutions can adapt existing structures to their specific needs. We describe our experience at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, where a locally tailored competency framework was developed to define six core educator domains and associated metrics. This initiative has driven significant changes in FD offerings, educator recognition, and promotion processes. Key lessons include the importance of making educator work visible, aligning FD with promotion pathways, delivering flexible programming, and engaging stakeholders early. Adapting frameworks to local contexts clarifies institutional values, supports customized faculty programming, and strengthens advocacy for educational excellence. Ultimately, competency-based FD serves as a strategic tool to enhance faculty satisfaction, retention, and institutional impact. We encourage institutions to adopt a systems-oriented approach that integrates shared standards with local relevance to elevate educational practice and culture.</p>","PeriodicalId":12488,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1621376"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12256433/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1621376","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Faculty development (FD) is foundational to advancing the quality of health professions education and, by extension, the healthcare system. While FD has traditionally emphasized teaching, its scope now includes educational leadership, scholarship, and systems-level change. This Perspective argues for the adoption of competency-based FD frameworks to not only support individual educator growth but also catalyze institutional transformation. Aligning FD programming with established educator competencies fosters professional identity, enables targeted skill development, and legitimizes educational contributions in academic medicine. Drawing from global models-including frameworks from the United States, United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Lebanon-we illustrate how institutions can adapt existing structures to their specific needs. We describe our experience at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, where a locally tailored competency framework was developed to define six core educator domains and associated metrics. This initiative has driven significant changes in FD offerings, educator recognition, and promotion processes. Key lessons include the importance of making educator work visible, aligning FD with promotion pathways, delivering flexible programming, and engaging stakeholders early. Adapting frameworks to local contexts clarifies institutional values, supports customized faculty programming, and strengthens advocacy for educational excellence. Ultimately, competency-based FD serves as a strategic tool to enhance faculty satisfaction, retention, and institutional impact. We encourage institutions to adopt a systems-oriented approach that integrates shared standards with local relevance to elevate educational practice and culture.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Medicine publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research linking basic research to clinical practice and patient care, as well as translating scientific advances into new therapies and diagnostic tools. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
In addition to papers that provide a link between basic research and clinical practice, a particular emphasis is given to studies that are directly relevant to patient care. In this spirit, the journal publishes the latest research results and medical knowledge that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or diagnostic tools. The full listing of the Specialty Sections represented by Frontiers in Medicine is as listed below. As well as the established medical disciplines, Frontiers in Medicine is launching new sections that together will facilitate
- the use of patient-reported outcomes under real world conditions
- the exploitation of big data and the use of novel information and communication tools in the assessment of new medicines
- the scientific bases for guidelines and decisions from regulatory authorities
- access to medicinal products and medical devices worldwide
- addressing the grand health challenges around the world