Bruno Curia , Chandra Bortolotto , Leonardo Brizzi , Simone Santagostini , Luca Caffù , Richard Naspro , Francesco Alessandrino , Lorenzo Preda
{"title":"Impact on MRI technologist of a PI-QUAL v2 educational program on prostate MRI image quality assessment","authors":"Bruno Curia , Chandra Bortolotto , Leonardo Brizzi , Simone Santagostini , Luca Caffù , Richard Naspro , Francesco Alessandrino , Lorenzo Preda","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The Prostate Imaging Quality scoring system version 2 (PI-QUAL v2) is a new scoring system used to assess the diagnostic quality of prostate magnetic resonance imaging (pMRI). This study investigated the impact of a focused training module on the ability of MRI technologists (MRI-Tech) and MRI-Tech students to evaluate pMRI image quality.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Thirty-nine subjects including MRI-Tech students and experienced MRI-Tech with different levels of experience in pMRI participated in the study. The image quality of twenty pMRIs was evaluated before and after a dedicated lecture on pMRI image quality assessment using PI-QUAL v2 score. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated for each scorer before and after the lecture, stratified by experience, and compared to the PI-QUAL v2 score assigned by a radiologist specialized in pMRI, using DeLong test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A significant improvement in AUC of pMRI image quality assessment was observed: from the baseline (0.31 ± 0.05) to the post-intervention (0.97 ± 0.01), with an improvement of 0.66 (p < 0.001). The ROC curves stratified by experience, demonstrated an improvement of 0.44 [0.50 ± 0.07–0.94 ± 0.01] for II-year MRI-Tech students (p < 0.001), of 0.48 [0.46 ± 0.09–0.94 ± 0.01] for III-year MRI-Tech students (p < 0.032) and 0.60 [0.33 ± 0.10–0.93 ± 0.01] for board-certified MRI-Techs (p < 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The PI-QUAL v2 training module improved the ability of both MRI-Tech students and board-certified MRI-Techs to assess the quality of pMRI images.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 112280"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25003663","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
The Prostate Imaging Quality scoring system version 2 (PI-QUAL v2) is a new scoring system used to assess the diagnostic quality of prostate magnetic resonance imaging (pMRI). This study investigated the impact of a focused training module on the ability of MRI technologists (MRI-Tech) and MRI-Tech students to evaluate pMRI image quality.
Methods
Thirty-nine subjects including MRI-Tech students and experienced MRI-Tech with different levels of experience in pMRI participated in the study. The image quality of twenty pMRIs was evaluated before and after a dedicated lecture on pMRI image quality assessment using PI-QUAL v2 score. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated for each scorer before and after the lecture, stratified by experience, and compared to the PI-QUAL v2 score assigned by a radiologist specialized in pMRI, using DeLong test.
Results
A significant improvement in AUC of pMRI image quality assessment was observed: from the baseline (0.31 ± 0.05) to the post-intervention (0.97 ± 0.01), with an improvement of 0.66 (p < 0.001). The ROC curves stratified by experience, demonstrated an improvement of 0.44 [0.50 ± 0.07–0.94 ± 0.01] for II-year MRI-Tech students (p < 0.001), of 0.48 [0.46 ± 0.09–0.94 ± 0.01] for III-year MRI-Tech students (p < 0.032) and 0.60 [0.33 ± 0.10–0.93 ± 0.01] for board-certified MRI-Techs (p < 0.001).
Conclusions
The PI-QUAL v2 training module improved the ability of both MRI-Tech students and board-certified MRI-Techs to assess the quality of pMRI images.
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field.
Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.