{"title":"The Long-term Results of Earfold Implantable Clip for the Correction of Protruding Ears: A Plastic Surgeon's Experience with an Initial 19 Cases.","authors":"Jasper Pauwels, Bernard Cambier","doi":"10.53045/jprs.2024-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This article reports the long-term results of the minimally invasive Earfold™ device.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between May 2017 and January 2021, 19 patients (7 men and 12 women) received an Earfold™ implant. Fifteen patients had bilateral implants placed, and among them, 2 received 2 implants per ear. In 4 cases, placement was limited to one ear. In one patient, a concurrent earlobe correction was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 22 patients assessed with Prefold™, 19 chose for this option instead of surgical otoplasty, 2 chose not to undergo any surgery, and one was not found fit for the procedure by the surgeon. Six patients suffered from a complication and had their implants removed. One additional patient requested to have his implants removed as well.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Earfold™ implant is a promising, minimally invasive alternative for standard otoplasty treatment. Nevertheless, in our series, a notable high complication rate was observed, often necessitating implant removal, particularly in the long term. Despite recognizing a learning curve, the surgeon in this study chose to discontinue the use of Earfold™ implants.</p>","PeriodicalId":520467,"journal":{"name":"Journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":"4 2","pages":"69-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12240689/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53045/jprs.2024-0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This article reports the long-term results of the minimally invasive Earfold™ device.
Methods: Between May 2017 and January 2021, 19 patients (7 men and 12 women) received an Earfold™ implant. Fifteen patients had bilateral implants placed, and among them, 2 received 2 implants per ear. In 4 cases, placement was limited to one ear. In one patient, a concurrent earlobe correction was performed.
Results: Of the 22 patients assessed with Prefold™, 19 chose for this option instead of surgical otoplasty, 2 chose not to undergo any surgery, and one was not found fit for the procedure by the surgeon. Six patients suffered from a complication and had their implants removed. One additional patient requested to have his implants removed as well.
Conclusions: The Earfold™ implant is a promising, minimally invasive alternative for standard otoplasty treatment. Nevertheless, in our series, a notable high complication rate was observed, often necessitating implant removal, particularly in the long term. Despite recognizing a learning curve, the surgeon in this study chose to discontinue the use of Earfold™ implants.