Influence of different photobiomodulation protocols on the prevention of chemotherapy-induced dysgeusia in breast cancer patients treated with Doxorubicin-Cyclophosphamide: a phase III, randomized, triple-blinded non-inferiority clinical trial.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Cassia Emanuella Nóbrega Malta, Marcela Maria Fontes Borges, Giulianna Aparecida Vieira Barreto, Gabriella Julião Alves Costa, Lais Oliveira Castro Barroso, André Alves Crispim, José Fernando Bastos de Moura, Paulo Goberlânio de Barros Silva
{"title":"Influence of different photobiomodulation protocols on the prevention of chemotherapy-induced dysgeusia in breast cancer patients treated with Doxorubicin-Cyclophosphamide: a phase III, randomized, triple-blinded non-inferiority clinical trial.","authors":"Cassia Emanuella Nóbrega Malta, Marcela Maria Fontes Borges, Giulianna Aparecida Vieira Barreto, Gabriella Julião Alves Costa, Lais Oliveira Castro Barroso, André Alves Crispim, José Fernando Bastos de Moura, Paulo Goberlânio de Barros Silva","doi":"10.1007/s00520-025-09756-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the non-inferiority of protocols with red (R) or infrared (IR) lasers alone when compared to the already established protocol of R + IR lasers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a phase III, randomized, triple-blind, non-inferiority, placebo-controlled clinical trial consisting of three study groups (n = 60/group): one receiving R + IR lasers, one receiving only R-laser and IR-placebo and the third with IR-laser and R-placebo (2 J of R-laser and 3 J of IR-laser) in 23-points symmetrically distributed on the tongue. Clinicopathological, sociodemographic data, hematological tests, taste analysis, subjective taste scales (VAS, CTCAE, and STTA), Quality-of-life (OHIP-14), ECOG general health status, body mass index (BMI), CPOD, salivary flow, and other side effects were collected. Chi-square/Fisher's exact tests and Kruskal-Wallis/Dunn (intergroup-analysis) or Friedman/Dunn (intragroup-analysis) tests were used (Margin of non-inferiority: 2-tailed p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the R + IR group, the objective did not reduce significantly (p = 0.873), but in the R-group, there was a significant reduction of taste function (p = 0.020). VAS (p < 0.001), CTCAE (p < 0.001), STTA (p < 0.001), and OHIP-14 (p < 0.001) analysis in the IR-group was significantly worse than the R + IR group. The ECOG parameter showed an improvement in the R + IR group (20%) compared to the R (11.7%) or IR (6.7%) groups over the course of the CT cycles (p = 0.037). There was no difference in BMI (p = 0.251), but the R + IR group gained significantly more weight (p = 0.044) without an increase in the frequency of obesity (p = 0.850). Groups R (p < 0.001) and IR (p = 0.046), but not R + IR (p = 0.369), showed a reduction in salivary flow.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Protocols R or IR proved to be inferior to the R + IR laser photobiomodulation protocol.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry ( www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br ).</p><p><strong>Approval number: </strong>RBR-9 × 5zrgm.</p><p><strong>Date of registration: </strong>12/07/2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"33 8","pages":"692"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09756-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the non-inferiority of protocols with red (R) or infrared (IR) lasers alone when compared to the already established protocol of R + IR lasers.

Methods: This is a phase III, randomized, triple-blind, non-inferiority, placebo-controlled clinical trial consisting of three study groups (n = 60/group): one receiving R + IR lasers, one receiving only R-laser and IR-placebo and the third with IR-laser and R-placebo (2 J of R-laser and 3 J of IR-laser) in 23-points symmetrically distributed on the tongue. Clinicopathological, sociodemographic data, hematological tests, taste analysis, subjective taste scales (VAS, CTCAE, and STTA), Quality-of-life (OHIP-14), ECOG general health status, body mass index (BMI), CPOD, salivary flow, and other side effects were collected. Chi-square/Fisher's exact tests and Kruskal-Wallis/Dunn (intergroup-analysis) or Friedman/Dunn (intragroup-analysis) tests were used (Margin of non-inferiority: 2-tailed p < 0.05).

Results: In the R + IR group, the objective did not reduce significantly (p = 0.873), but in the R-group, there was a significant reduction of taste function (p = 0.020). VAS (p < 0.001), CTCAE (p < 0.001), STTA (p < 0.001), and OHIP-14 (p < 0.001) analysis in the IR-group was significantly worse than the R + IR group. The ECOG parameter showed an improvement in the R + IR group (20%) compared to the R (11.7%) or IR (6.7%) groups over the course of the CT cycles (p = 0.037). There was no difference in BMI (p = 0.251), but the R + IR group gained significantly more weight (p = 0.044) without an increase in the frequency of obesity (p = 0.850). Groups R (p < 0.001) and IR (p = 0.046), but not R + IR (p = 0.369), showed a reduction in salivary flow.

Conclusion: Protocols R or IR proved to be inferior to the R + IR laser photobiomodulation protocol.

Trial registration: Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry ( www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br ).

Approval number: RBR-9 × 5zrgm.

Date of registration: 12/07/2023.

不同光生物调节方案对多柔比星-环磷酰胺治疗乳腺癌患者预防化疗诱导的功能障碍的影响:一项随机、三盲、非劣效性的III期临床试验
目的:评价单独使用红色(R)或红外(IR)激光器的方案与已经建立的R + IR激光器方案相比的非劣效性。方法:这是一项随机、三盲、非安慰剂对照的III期临床试验,包括三个研究组(n = 60/组):一组接受R + IR激光,一组只接受R激光和IR-安慰剂,第三组同时接受R激光和R-安慰剂(2 J R激光和3 J IR激光),在舌头上对称分布的23个点。收集临床病理、社会人口学数据、血液学检查、味觉分析、主观味觉量表(VAS、CTCAE和STTA)、生活质量(o嘻哈-14)、ECOG一般健康状况、体重指数(BMI)、CPOD、唾液流量和其他副作用。采用卡方/Fisher精确检验和Kruskal-Wallis/Dunn(组间分析)或Friedman/Dunn(组内分析)检验(非效缘:双尾p)结果:在R + IR组中,目标没有显著降低(p = 0.873),但在R组中,味觉功能显著降低(p = 0.020)。结论:R或IR方案优于R + IR激光光生物调节方案。试验注册:巴西临床试验注册中心(www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br)。批准文号:RBR-9 × 5zrgm。注册日期:2023年7月12日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信