Positional effects on gastric pressures and esophagogastric pressure gradients in patients with gastroesophageal reflux.

IF 2.6 3区 医学
Yassmin K Hegazy, Sydney F Pomenti, Daniela Jodorkovsky, Daniel E Freedberg, David A Katzka
{"title":"Positional effects on gastric pressures and esophagogastric pressure gradients in patients with gastroesophageal reflux.","authors":"Yassmin K Hegazy, Sydney F Pomenti, Daniela Jodorkovsky, Daniel E Freedberg, David A Katzka","doi":"10.1093/dote/doaf053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Most mechanistic research on gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) focuses on LES pressure (LESP) and not the gastric-LESP gradient required to facilitate regurgitation. Our study focuses on gastric pressures (GP) during high-resolution manometry (HRM) and the magnitude and pressure gradient direction across the LES in patients with normal, upright, and supine GERD at baseline and with swallows.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study is a retrospective study evaluating patients who underwent HRM and 24 h impedance and categorized as patients with normal, upright, and supine esophageal acid exposure. Data was collected from the electronic medical record at our institution. GP was measured 2 centimeters (cm) below the LES at baseline and before and during swallows. Results were measured as means, medians, and standard deviations for continuous variables between the three groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>42 patients were evaluated, including 22 normal (14F), 10 upright (8F), and 10 (8F) supine refluxers. Normal patients had a total acid exposure time of 1.4% (IQR 0.8-2.8%), upright had 6.4% (4.6-7.8%), and supine had 11.4% (7.8-21%). At baseline, the LESP was 35.59 mmHg, 31.97 mmHg, and 25.38 mmHg while the mean GP was 20.90 mmHg, 19.49 mmHg, and 21.80 mmHg, for normal, upright, and supine patients, respectively. No differences were seen in the mean GP during supine and upright swallow positions within any of the phenotypic groups, or when comparing differences in GP between upright vs. supine swallows across the three groups (Kruskal-Wallis P = 0.25). During upright swallows, the maximum GP was 15.8 mmHg (12.5-19.4), 17.2 (13.7-21.1), and 16.4 (14.1-22.7); LESP was 34.6 mmHg (IQR 27.4-47.2), 34.1 (25.3-36), and 21.7 (16.4-28.1); and integrative relaxation pressure (IRP) was 14.0 (10.6-17.3), 11.8 (10.6-15.5), and 8.8 (5.6-14.4) for the normal, upright and supine groups respectively. For normal patients, LESP consistently exceeded mean GP; during supine swallows, one patient in the normal group had median GP > LESP. For the upright group, 15/48 and 28/48 swallows had GP > IRP in the upright and supine positions, respectively. For the supine group, 24/48 and 32/48 swallows had GP > IRP upright and supine positions, respectively. During upright swallows, the median within-individual pressure gradient (IRP minus GP) was +6.2 mmHg (+3.9 to +11.3) for normal patients without reflux, +5.7 (+1.1 to +7.3) for patients with upright reflux, and + 1.4 (-0.3 to +5.0) for patients with supine reflux; during supine swallows, the same within-individual pressure gradient was +6.7 (+2.7 to +9.1), +4.0 (+2.4 to +6.3), and - 0.8 (-4.6 to +4.8) for the groups respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that the magnitude of LES-GP gradient decrease is related to the positional phenotype of gastroesophageal reflux with the lowest gradient seen in supine refluxers. It is This suggests that measuring the LES-GP gradient could be useful in characterizing patients with GERD.</p>","PeriodicalId":54277,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":"38 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the Esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doaf053","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Most mechanistic research on gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) focuses on LES pressure (LESP) and not the gastric-LESP gradient required to facilitate regurgitation. Our study focuses on gastric pressures (GP) during high-resolution manometry (HRM) and the magnitude and pressure gradient direction across the LES in patients with normal, upright, and supine GERD at baseline and with swallows.

Methods: Our study is a retrospective study evaluating patients who underwent HRM and 24 h impedance and categorized as patients with normal, upright, and supine esophageal acid exposure. Data was collected from the electronic medical record at our institution. GP was measured 2 centimeters (cm) below the LES at baseline and before and during swallows. Results were measured as means, medians, and standard deviations for continuous variables between the three groups.

Results: 42 patients were evaluated, including 22 normal (14F), 10 upright (8F), and 10 (8F) supine refluxers. Normal patients had a total acid exposure time of 1.4% (IQR 0.8-2.8%), upright had 6.4% (4.6-7.8%), and supine had 11.4% (7.8-21%). At baseline, the LESP was 35.59 mmHg, 31.97 mmHg, and 25.38 mmHg while the mean GP was 20.90 mmHg, 19.49 mmHg, and 21.80 mmHg, for normal, upright, and supine patients, respectively. No differences were seen in the mean GP during supine and upright swallow positions within any of the phenotypic groups, or when comparing differences in GP between upright vs. supine swallows across the three groups (Kruskal-Wallis P = 0.25). During upright swallows, the maximum GP was 15.8 mmHg (12.5-19.4), 17.2 (13.7-21.1), and 16.4 (14.1-22.7); LESP was 34.6 mmHg (IQR 27.4-47.2), 34.1 (25.3-36), and 21.7 (16.4-28.1); and integrative relaxation pressure (IRP) was 14.0 (10.6-17.3), 11.8 (10.6-15.5), and 8.8 (5.6-14.4) for the normal, upright and supine groups respectively. For normal patients, LESP consistently exceeded mean GP; during supine swallows, one patient in the normal group had median GP > LESP. For the upright group, 15/48 and 28/48 swallows had GP > IRP in the upright and supine positions, respectively. For the supine group, 24/48 and 32/48 swallows had GP > IRP upright and supine positions, respectively. During upright swallows, the median within-individual pressure gradient (IRP minus GP) was +6.2 mmHg (+3.9 to +11.3) for normal patients without reflux, +5.7 (+1.1 to +7.3) for patients with upright reflux, and + 1.4 (-0.3 to +5.0) for patients with supine reflux; during supine swallows, the same within-individual pressure gradient was +6.7 (+2.7 to +9.1), +4.0 (+2.4 to +6.3), and - 0.8 (-4.6 to +4.8) for the groups respectively.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the magnitude of LES-GP gradient decrease is related to the positional phenotype of gastroesophageal reflux with the lowest gradient seen in supine refluxers. It is This suggests that measuring the LES-GP gradient could be useful in characterizing patients with GERD.

胃食管反流患者体位对胃压力和食管胃压力梯度的影响。
导读:大多数关于胃食管反流病(GERD)的机制研究都集中在LES压力(LESP)上,而不是促进反流所需的胃-LESP梯度。我们的研究重点是高分辨率测压(HRM)期间的胃压(GP)以及正常、直立和仰卧胃食管反流患者在基线和吞咽时的胃压梯度方向。方法:我们的研究是一项回顾性研究,评估接受HRM和24小时阻抗的患者,并将其分为正常、直立和仰卧食道酸暴露患者。数据从我们机构的电子病历中收集。GP在基线时、吞咽前和吞咽时比LES低2厘米(cm)。结果以三组间连续变量的平均值、中位数和标准差来测量。结果:42例患者被评估,包括22例正常(14F), 10例直立(8F)和10例仰卧(8F)反流者。正常患者的总酸暴露时间为1.4% (IQR 0.8-2.8%),直立为6.4%(4.6-7.8%),仰卧为11.4%(7.8-21%)。基线时,正常、直立和仰卧患者的LESP分别为35.59 mmHg、31.97 mmHg和25.38 mmHg,而平均GP分别为20.90 mmHg、19.49 mmHg和21.80 mmHg。在任何表型组中,在仰卧和直立吞咽时的平均GP没有差异,或者在比较三组中直立和仰卧吞咽之间GP的差异时(Kruskal-Wallis P = 0.25)。直立吞咽时,最大GP分别为15.8 mmHg(12.5 ~ 19.4)、17.2 mmHg(13.7 ~ 21.1)和16.4 mmHg (14.1 ~ 22.7);LESP为34.6 mmHg (IQR为27.4-47.2)、34.1(25.3-36)和21.7 (16.4-28.1);正常组、直立组和仰卧组的综合松弛压力(IRP)分别为14.0(10.6 ~ 17.3)、11.8(10.6 ~ 15.5)和8.8(5.6 ~ 14.4)。对于正常患者,LESP持续高于平均GP;平卧吞咽时,正常组1例患者中位GP > LESP。直立组15/48只和28/48只燕子在直立和仰卧位置分别有GP > IRP。仰卧位组24/48只和32/48只燕子分别有GP >和IRP直立和仰卧位。在直立吞咽时,无反流的正常患者个体内压力梯度(IRP减去GP)中位数为+6.2 mmHg(+3.9至+11.3),直立反流患者为+5.7(+1.1至+7.3),仰卧反流患者为+ 1.4(-0.3至+5.0);仰卧时,各组个体内压力梯度分别为+6.7(+2.7 ~ +9.1)、+4.0(+2.4 ~ +6.3)和- 0.8(-4.6 ~ +4.8)。结论:本研究表明LES-GP梯度降低的幅度与胃食管反流的位置表型有关,仰卧位反流者的梯度最低。这表明测量LES-GP梯度可能对胃食管反流患者的特征有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diseases of the Esophagus
Diseases of the Esophagus Medicine-Gastroenterology
自引率
7.70%
发文量
568
期刊介绍: Diseases of the Esophagus covers all aspects of the esophagus - etiology, investigation and diagnosis, and both medical and surgical treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信