Key to better outcomes in stroke intervention: early versus complete reperfusion in first pass recanalization.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Alexander Heitkamp, Sophie-Maria Hierholzer, Christian Heitkamp, Laurens Winkelmeier, Lukas Meyer, Matthias Bechstein, Vincent Geest, Gabriel Broocks, Caspar Brekenfeld, Fabian Flottmann, Maximilian Schell, Götz Thomalla, Tobias Faizy, Jens Fiehler, Helge C Kniep, Susanne Gellißen
{"title":"Key to better outcomes in stroke intervention: early versus complete reperfusion in first pass recanalization.","authors":"Alexander Heitkamp, Sophie-Maria Hierholzer, Christian Heitkamp, Laurens Winkelmeier, Lukas Meyer, Matthias Bechstein, Vincent Geest, Gabriel Broocks, Caspar Brekenfeld, Fabian Flottmann, Maximilian Schell, Götz Thomalla, Tobias Faizy, Jens Fiehler, Helge C Kniep, Susanne Gellißen","doi":"10.1007/s00415-025-13235-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>First pass (FP) recanalization, defined as achieving mTICI 2b or higher in a single thrombectomy attempt, has been linked to better functional recovery in acute ischemic stroke patients. This study aimed to investigate whether the benefits of FP are primarily driven by higher rates of complete reperfusion (mTICI 3) or by faster procedure times.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 3707 patients with middle cerebral artery occlusion and successful recanalization (mTICI 2b or higher) were extracted from the prospectively designed German Stroke Registry (2015-2021). Good functional outcomes were defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of ≤ 2 at 90 days. Mediation analysis was used to evaluate the extent to which complete reperfusion (mTICI 3) and shorter groin puncture to recanalization time contributed to improved outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FP recanalization was associated with significantly better functional outcomes: 46.9% of FP patients achieved an mRS ≤ 2 compared to 37.2% in the multi-pass group. Mediation analysis showed that only 14% of the improved outcomes with FP were explained by higher mTICI 3 rates, while 37% were attributed to faster recanalization times.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The improved outcomes associated with FP recanalization are primarily driven by the speed of reperfusion rather than the degree of complete recanalization. This highlights the importance of minimizing procedure times and the number of thrombectomy attempts. Strategies aimed at optimizing treatment workflows and improving device design to prioritize early and efficient reperfusion after the FP are critical to improving patient outcomes (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03356392).</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 8","pages":"504"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12254091/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-13235-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: First pass (FP) recanalization, defined as achieving mTICI 2b or higher in a single thrombectomy attempt, has been linked to better functional recovery in acute ischemic stroke patients. This study aimed to investigate whether the benefits of FP are primarily driven by higher rates of complete reperfusion (mTICI 3) or by faster procedure times.

Methods: Data from 3707 patients with middle cerebral artery occlusion and successful recanalization (mTICI 2b or higher) were extracted from the prospectively designed German Stroke Registry (2015-2021). Good functional outcomes were defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of ≤ 2 at 90 days. Mediation analysis was used to evaluate the extent to which complete reperfusion (mTICI 3) and shorter groin puncture to recanalization time contributed to improved outcomes.

Results: FP recanalization was associated with significantly better functional outcomes: 46.9% of FP patients achieved an mRS ≤ 2 compared to 37.2% in the multi-pass group. Mediation analysis showed that only 14% of the improved outcomes with FP were explained by higher mTICI 3 rates, while 37% were attributed to faster recanalization times.

Conclusion: The improved outcomes associated with FP recanalization are primarily driven by the speed of reperfusion rather than the degree of complete recanalization. This highlights the importance of minimizing procedure times and the number of thrombectomy attempts. Strategies aimed at optimizing treatment workflows and improving device design to prioritize early and efficient reperfusion after the FP are critical to improving patient outcomes (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03356392).

卒中干预中更好结果的关键:早期与完全再灌注在第一次通道再通中。
背景和目的:首次通过(FP)再通,定义为在单次取栓尝试中达到mTICI 2b或更高,与急性缺血性卒中患者更好的功能恢复有关。本研究旨在探讨FP的益处主要是由更高的完全再灌注率(mTICI 3)还是更快的手术时间驱动的。方法:从前瞻性设计的德国卒中登记处(2015-2021)中提取3707例大脑中动脉闭塞并成功再通(mTICI 2b或更高)患者的数据。良好的功能预后定义为90天时改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分≤2。采用中介分析来评估完全再灌注(mtici3)和较短的腹股沟穿刺至再通时间对改善预后的影响程度。结果:FP再通与更好的功能预后相关:46.9%的FP患者达到mRS≤2,而多通道组为37.2%。中介分析显示,只有14%的FP改善结果可以用更高的mTICI 3率来解释,而37%归因于更快的再通时间。结论:FP再通的改善主要取决于再灌注的速度,而不是再通的完全程度。这突出了减少手术时间和取栓次数的重要性。旨在优化治疗流程和改进设备设计以优先考虑FP后早期和有效再灌注的策略对于改善患者预后至关重要(ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03356392)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neurology
Journal of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
558
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field. In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials. Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信