Effect of Cavity Design on Bacterial Reduction in Root Canals and Postoperative Pain Level: A Randomised Controlled Trial.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
M M Özen, E Karataş
{"title":"Effect of Cavity Design on Bacterial Reduction in Root Canals and Postoperative Pain Level: A Randomised Controlled Trial.","authors":"M M Özen, E Karataş","doi":"10.1111/aej.12976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To compare the truss endodontic cavity (TREC) design against the traditional conservative endodontic cavity (TEC) design in terms of intracanal bacteria removal and the impact on postoperative pain. A randomised controlled trial was conducted involving 100 patients, who were assigned to either the TEC group or the TREC group. Bacteriological samples from the root canals were collected both pre- and post-chemo-mechanical preparation. The total bacterial counts were determined by using qPCR and the postoperative pain intensity was measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS). To analyse bacterial load and postoperative pain levels within groups, the Wilcoxon and Friedman tests were utilised, respectively. The TEC group achieved a 96% reduction in bacterial counts, whereas the TREC group exhibited a 92% reduction, with this difference being statistically significant. These findings highlight the importance of cavity design in endodontic procedures and its potential implications for clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":55581,"journal":{"name":"Australian Endodontic Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12976","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To compare the truss endodontic cavity (TREC) design against the traditional conservative endodontic cavity (TEC) design in terms of intracanal bacteria removal and the impact on postoperative pain. A randomised controlled trial was conducted involving 100 patients, who were assigned to either the TEC group or the TREC group. Bacteriological samples from the root canals were collected both pre- and post-chemo-mechanical preparation. The total bacterial counts were determined by using qPCR and the postoperative pain intensity was measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS). To analyse bacterial load and postoperative pain levels within groups, the Wilcoxon and Friedman tests were utilised, respectively. The TEC group achieved a 96% reduction in bacterial counts, whereas the TREC group exhibited a 92% reduction, with this difference being statistically significant. These findings highlight the importance of cavity design in endodontic procedures and its potential implications for clinical practice.

空腔设计对根管细菌减少和术后疼痛水平的影响:一项随机对照试验。
比较桁架型牙髓腔(TREC)与传统保守型牙髓腔(TEC)在牙髓内细菌清除及对术后疼痛的影响。进行了一项随机对照试验,涉及100名患者,他们被分配到TEC组或TREC组。在化学机械制备前后分别收集根管细菌学样本。采用qPCR法测定细菌总数,采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)测定术后疼痛强度。为了分析组内细菌负荷和术后疼痛水平,分别使用了Wilcoxon和Friedman试验。TEC组的细菌数量减少了96%,而TREC组的细菌数量减少了92%,这一差异具有统计学意义。这些发现强调了牙髓治疗过程中腔体设计的重要性及其对临床实践的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian Endodontic Journal
Australian Endodontic Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
99
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Endodontic Journal provides a forum for communication in the different fields that encompass endodontics for all specialists and dentists with an interest in the morphology, physiology, and pathology of the human tooth, in particular the dental pulp, root and peri-radicular tissues. The Journal features regular clinical updates, research reports and case reports from authors worldwide, and also publishes meeting abstracts, society news and historical endodontic glimpses. The Australian Endodontic Journal is a publication for dentists in general and specialist practice devoted solely to endodontics. It aims to promote communication in the different fields that encompass endodontics for those dentists who have a special interest in endodontics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信