Shangchun Hu , Jiahui Liu , Jing Que , Yujia Li , Xing Su , Baoqin Li , Guoyu Wang
{"title":"Assessing urban rewilding potential: Plant diversity and public landscape perceptions in urban wildscapes of Harbin, China","authors":"Shangchun Hu , Jiahui Liu , Jing Que , Yujia Li , Xing Su , Baoqin Li , Guoyu Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.128958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban rewilding has gained increasing attention as a strategy to restore ecological processes and enhance biodiversity in cities. Urban wilderness areas, by supporting spontaneous vegetation and minimal human intervention, offer both ecological benefits and opportunities for human-nature interactions. However, few studies have jointly examined plant diversity and public perception across different wilderness types within a single urban context. This study investigated 16 urban wilderness sites in Harbin, China, classified into three types—Remnant and Protected Wilderness (RPW), Vacant Lot Wilderness (VLW), and Industrial Derelict Wilderness (IDW). We conducted field surveys to assess species, functional, and phylogenetic plant diversity, and used a photo-questionnaire (n = 1570) to evaluate public perceptions of aesthetic appeal, restoration, and exploration. Results show that higher exposure to urban wilderness was associated with significantly greater perceived landscape value. RPW sites demonstrated stronger ecological-social synergy, while IDW sites showed weaker coupling coordination. Plant phylogenetic diversity and measured species richness were positively correlated with public perception metrics. The study underscores the potential of differentiated wilderness types to simultaneously advance biodiversity goals and social well-being, emphasizing the need for integrative, site-sensitive approaches to urban rewilding and green space planning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"112 ","pages":"Article 128958"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866725002924","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Urban rewilding has gained increasing attention as a strategy to restore ecological processes and enhance biodiversity in cities. Urban wilderness areas, by supporting spontaneous vegetation and minimal human intervention, offer both ecological benefits and opportunities for human-nature interactions. However, few studies have jointly examined plant diversity and public perception across different wilderness types within a single urban context. This study investigated 16 urban wilderness sites in Harbin, China, classified into three types—Remnant and Protected Wilderness (RPW), Vacant Lot Wilderness (VLW), and Industrial Derelict Wilderness (IDW). We conducted field surveys to assess species, functional, and phylogenetic plant diversity, and used a photo-questionnaire (n = 1570) to evaluate public perceptions of aesthetic appeal, restoration, and exploration. Results show that higher exposure to urban wilderness was associated with significantly greater perceived landscape value. RPW sites demonstrated stronger ecological-social synergy, while IDW sites showed weaker coupling coordination. Plant phylogenetic diversity and measured species richness were positively correlated with public perception metrics. The study underscores the potential of differentiated wilderness types to simultaneously advance biodiversity goals and social well-being, emphasizing the need for integrative, site-sensitive approaches to urban rewilding and green space planning.
期刊介绍:
Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries.
The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects:
-Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology.
-Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation.
-Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments.
-Management of urban forests and other vegetation.
Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.