Incorporating digital health into organizational health literacy: An updated definition, tools, and recommendations.

Q3 Medicine
Helen Monkman, Blake J Lesselroth
{"title":"Incorporating digital health into organizational health literacy: An updated definition, tools, and recommendations.","authors":"Helen Monkman, Blake J Lesselroth","doi":"10.1177/08404704251356518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health literacy is important from two perspectives: the individuals (personal health literacy) and the organizations providing information and services (organizational health literacy). While research has addressed digitalization in healthcare and associated barriers and enablers in personal health literacy (e.g., digital health literacy), these developments have not been paraleled in organizational health literacy. In this article, we proposed an augmented definition of organizational health literacy and conducted a gap analysis of the Health Literacy Universal Precautions Toolkit to expand it for digital health. Important advancements, specifically for virtual care, have been made, yet a broader approach must be adopted for all digital health technology. We proposed a series of modifications to emphasize the importance of digital health in organizational health literacy. Organizations must equitably enable individuals to understand and use digital information and services. In this monograph, we describe the current informatics gap and the required competencies, policies, and infrastructure to close the gap.</p>","PeriodicalId":39854,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Management Forum","volume":" ","pages":"8404704251356518"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Management Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08404704251356518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Health literacy is important from two perspectives: the individuals (personal health literacy) and the organizations providing information and services (organizational health literacy). While research has addressed digitalization in healthcare and associated barriers and enablers in personal health literacy (e.g., digital health literacy), these developments have not been paraleled in organizational health literacy. In this article, we proposed an augmented definition of organizational health literacy and conducted a gap analysis of the Health Literacy Universal Precautions Toolkit to expand it for digital health. Important advancements, specifically for virtual care, have been made, yet a broader approach must be adopted for all digital health technology. We proposed a series of modifications to emphasize the importance of digital health in organizational health literacy. Organizations must equitably enable individuals to understand and use digital information and services. In this monograph, we describe the current informatics gap and the required competencies, policies, and infrastructure to close the gap.

将数字健康纳入组织健康素养:更新的定义、工具和建议。
从两个角度来看,健康素养很重要:个人(个人健康素养)和提供信息和服务的组织(组织健康素养)。虽然已有研究解决了医疗保健领域的数字化问题以及个人健康素养方面的相关障碍和推动因素(例如,数字健康素养),但这些发展并未在组织健康素养方面得到平行发展。在本文中,我们提出了组织健康素养的扩展定义,并对健康素养普遍预防工具包进行了差距分析,以扩展其用于数字健康。已经取得了重要进展,特别是在虚拟医疗方面,但必须对所有数字卫生技术采取更广泛的方法。我们提出了一系列的修改,以强调数字健康在组织健康素养中的重要性。组织必须公平地使个人能够理解和使用数字信息和服务。在这本专著中,我们描述了当前的信息学差距以及缩小差距所需的能力、政策和基础设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare Management Forum
Healthcare Management Forum Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Healthcare Management Forum is the official journal of the Canadian College of Health Service Executives. It is the only peer-reviewed journal that covers issues related to advances in health services management, theory and practice in a Canadian context. The quality of its contributors, the rigorous review process and the leading-edge topics make it truly unique!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信