Correlations Between Physiological and Self-Report Measures of Daily Physical Activity Time and Intensity in Adults With Spinal Cord Injury.

Cameron M Gee, Ava Neely, Aleksandra Jevdjevic, Kenedy Olsen, Kathleen A Martin Ginis
{"title":"Correlations Between Physiological and Self-Report Measures of Daily Physical Activity Time and Intensity in Adults With Spinal Cord Injury.","authors":"Cameron M Gee, Ava Neely, Aleksandra Jevdjevic, Kenedy Olsen, Kathleen A Martin Ginis","doi":"10.1123/apaq.2025-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spinal cord injury (SCI) can alter physiological responses to acute physical activity (PA), which may influence perceptions and reporting of PA intensity. We examined correlations between physiological and perceptual self-report measures of daily PA in individuals with SCI. Participants completed an assessment of peak aerobic-exercise capacity to determine individualized mild-, moderate-, and vigorous-intensity PA oxygen-uptake (V˙O2) cut points, wore a portable system that measured V˙O2, and completed the Physical Activity Recall Assessment for people with SCI. Time engaged in combined moderate to vigorous PA recorded by portable monitoring and self-report were significantly correlated (r = .659, p = .027). There were no associations between metabolic monitoring and equivalent self-report outcomes within individual PA-intensity levels. These findings highlight challenges people with SCI may have differentiating the intensity of PA, which may be related to the way self-report measures describe sensations associated with each intensity. Whether these findings are specific to SCI-related psychophysiology remains unclear.</p>","PeriodicalId":520545,"journal":{"name":"Adapted physical activity quarterly : APAQ","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adapted physical activity quarterly : APAQ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.2025-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) can alter physiological responses to acute physical activity (PA), which may influence perceptions and reporting of PA intensity. We examined correlations between physiological and perceptual self-report measures of daily PA in individuals with SCI. Participants completed an assessment of peak aerobic-exercise capacity to determine individualized mild-, moderate-, and vigorous-intensity PA oxygen-uptake (V˙O2) cut points, wore a portable system that measured V˙O2, and completed the Physical Activity Recall Assessment for people with SCI. Time engaged in combined moderate to vigorous PA recorded by portable monitoring and self-report were significantly correlated (r = .659, p = .027). There were no associations between metabolic monitoring and equivalent self-report outcomes within individual PA-intensity levels. These findings highlight challenges people with SCI may have differentiating the intensity of PA, which may be related to the way self-report measures describe sensations associated with each intensity. Whether these findings are specific to SCI-related psychophysiology remains unclear.

脊髓损伤成人每日体力活动时间和强度的生理和自我报告测量之间的相关性
脊髓损伤(SCI)可以改变对急性体力活动(PA)的生理反应,这可能影响对PA强度的感知和报告。我们研究了脊髓损伤患者日常PA的生理和知觉自我报告测量之间的相关性。参与者完成了峰值有氧运动能力的评估,以确定个体化的轻度、中度和高强度PA氧摄取(V˙O2)切断点,佩戴了测量V˙O2的便携式系统,并完成了脊髓损伤患者的身体活动回忆评估。便携式监护记录的中度至重度联合PA时间与自我报告的时间有显著相关(r = 0.659, p = 0.027)。在个体pa强度水平内,代谢监测和等效自我报告结果之间没有关联。这些发现突出了脊髓损伤患者可能在区分PA强度方面面临的挑战,这可能与自我报告测量描述与每种强度相关的感觉的方式有关。这些发现是否与sci相关的心理生理学有关尚不清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信