Algorithmic anthropomorphism and AI moral standing: The moderating role of mortality salience.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Qing Xie, Jing Lin, Yue Ding, Yu Kou
{"title":"Algorithmic anthropomorphism and AI moral standing: The moderating role of mortality salience.","authors":"Qing Xie, Jing Lin, Yue Ding, Yu Kou","doi":"10.1080/07481187.2025.2529275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous studies indicate that AI's appearance enhances its moral standing, but the role of algorithmic anthropomorphism (how it talks) remains unknown. According to Terror Management Theory, human moral concern toward AI is not always immutable and may be shaped by the presence of mortality salience. We investigated the effect of algorithmic anthropomorphism on AI moral standing, as well as the moderating role of mortality salience, through two experiments. Chinese college students answered questions online regarding functional AI and social AI. Algorithmic anthropomorphism significantly promoted the moral standing of both functional AI and social AI. Mortality salience played differentiated moderating roles, reversing the positive impact of algorithmic anthropomorphism on functional AI moral standing and enhancing it on social AI moral standing. The findings expand the research on AI ethics and Terror Management Theory, contributing to a better understanding of AI moral standing and mortality reminders.</p>","PeriodicalId":11041,"journal":{"name":"Death Studies","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Death Studies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2025.2529275","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies indicate that AI's appearance enhances its moral standing, but the role of algorithmic anthropomorphism (how it talks) remains unknown. According to Terror Management Theory, human moral concern toward AI is not always immutable and may be shaped by the presence of mortality salience. We investigated the effect of algorithmic anthropomorphism on AI moral standing, as well as the moderating role of mortality salience, through two experiments. Chinese college students answered questions online regarding functional AI and social AI. Algorithmic anthropomorphism significantly promoted the moral standing of both functional AI and social AI. Mortality salience played differentiated moderating roles, reversing the positive impact of algorithmic anthropomorphism on functional AI moral standing and enhancing it on social AI moral standing. The findings expand the research on AI ethics and Terror Management Theory, contributing to a better understanding of AI moral standing and mortality reminders.

算法拟人化与人工智能道德地位:死亡率显著性的调节作用。
先前的研究表明,人工智能的外表提高了它的道德地位,但算法拟人化(它如何说话)的作用仍然未知。根据恐惧管理理论,人类对人工智能的道德关注并不总是不变的,可能会受到死亡显著性的影响。我们通过两个实验研究了算法拟人化对人工智能道德地位的影响,以及死亡率显著性的调节作用。中国大学生在网上回答了关于功能人工智能和社交人工智能的问题。算法拟人化显著提升了功能性人工智能和社会性人工智能的道德地位。死亡率显著性发挥了差异化的调节作用,逆转了算法拟人化对功能性AI道德地位的积极影响,增强了算法拟人化对社会AI道德地位的积极影响。这一发现扩大了人工智能伦理和恐怖管理理论的研究,有助于更好地理解人工智能的道德地位和死亡提醒。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Death Studies
Death Studies Multiple-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
7.90%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: Now published ten times each year, this acclaimed journal provides refereed papers on significant research, scholarship, and practical approaches in the fast growing areas of bereavement and loss, grief therapy, death attitudes, suicide, and death education. It provides an international interdisciplinary forum in which a variety of professionals share results of research and practice, with the aim of better understanding the human encounter with death and assisting those who work with the dying and their families.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信