Platelet Dynamics During Impella Use: A Time-Series Analysis by Model and Treatment Method.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Ikuko Shibasaki, Yasuo Haruyama, Suguru Hirose, Yusuke Takei, Shigeru Toyoda, Hirotsugu Fukuda
{"title":"Platelet Dynamics During Impella Use: A Time-Series Analysis by Model and Treatment Method.","authors":"Ikuko Shibasaki, Yasuo Haruyama, Suguru Hirose, Yusuke Takei, Shigeru Toyoda, Hirotsugu Fukuda","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mechanical circulatory support is the standard treatment for refractory cardiogenic shock. However, Impella-induced thrombocytopenia is an established complication, and data on its incidence and characteristics remain limited. This study compared thrombocytopenia progression between patients who received different Impella devices (2.5/CP and 5.0/5.5) using Impella-alone or ECpella strategies. ECpella was defined as Impella combined with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Secondary analyses were conducted to evaluate factors influencing complications and mortality. Between April 2018 and December 2024, 35 patients received Impella 2.5/CP alone, 67 received ECpella (2.5/CP was used), six received Impella 5.0/5.5 alone, and 13 received ECpella (5.0/5.5 was used). Platelet counts decreased significantly over time in the Impella 2.5/CP subgroups, with a greater reduction observed in the ECpella subgroup. Significant platelet count reduction was observed in only the ECpella subgroup of the Impella 5.0/5.5 group. A haptoglobin level of <10 mg/dl was more commonly noted in the Impella-alone subgroup of the Impella 2.5/CP group and in the ECpella subgroup of the Impella 5.0/5.5 group. The platelet count on day 3 post-implantation was associated with 1 year survival in the Impella 2.5/CP group (hazard ratio: 1.174, 95% confidence interval: 1.033-1.333, p = 0.014). These findings warrant validation in larger prospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASAIO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002498","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mechanical circulatory support is the standard treatment for refractory cardiogenic shock. However, Impella-induced thrombocytopenia is an established complication, and data on its incidence and characteristics remain limited. This study compared thrombocytopenia progression between patients who received different Impella devices (2.5/CP and 5.0/5.5) using Impella-alone or ECpella strategies. ECpella was defined as Impella combined with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Secondary analyses were conducted to evaluate factors influencing complications and mortality. Between April 2018 and December 2024, 35 patients received Impella 2.5/CP alone, 67 received ECpella (2.5/CP was used), six received Impella 5.0/5.5 alone, and 13 received ECpella (5.0/5.5 was used). Platelet counts decreased significantly over time in the Impella 2.5/CP subgroups, with a greater reduction observed in the ECpella subgroup. Significant platelet count reduction was observed in only the ECpella subgroup of the Impella 5.0/5.5 group. A haptoglobin level of <10 mg/dl was more commonly noted in the Impella-alone subgroup of the Impella 2.5/CP group and in the ECpella subgroup of the Impella 5.0/5.5 group. The platelet count on day 3 post-implantation was associated with 1 year survival in the Impella 2.5/CP group (hazard ratio: 1.174, 95% confidence interval: 1.033-1.333, p = 0.014). These findings warrant validation in larger prospective studies.

血小板动力学在叶轮使用:一个时间序列分析的模型和处理方法。
机械循环支持是难治性心源性休克的标准治疗方法。然而,impella诱发的血小板减少症是一种确定的并发症,其发生率和特征的数据仍然有限。该研究比较了单独使用Impella或ECpella策略接受不同Impella装置(2.5/CP和5.0/5.5)的患者的血小板减少进展情况。ECpella定义为Impella联合静脉-动脉体外膜氧合。对影响并发症和死亡率的因素进行二次分析。2018年4月至2024年12月,35例患者单独使用Impella 2.5/CP, 67例患者单独使用ECpella (2.5/CP), 6例患者单独使用Impella 5.0/5.5, 13例患者单独使用ECpella(5.0/5.5)。在Impella 2.5/CP亚组中,血小板计数随着时间的推移显着下降,在ECpella亚组中观察到更大的下降。在Impella 5.0/5.5组中,只有ECpella亚组血小板计数明显减少。触珠蛋白水平为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ASAIO Journal
ASAIO Journal 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
651
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ASAIO Journal is in the forefront of artificial organ research and development. On the cutting edge of innovative technology, it features peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality that describe research, development, the most recent advances in the design of artificial organ devices and findings from initial testing. Bimonthly, the ASAIO Journal features state-of-the-art investigations, laboratory and clinical trials, and discussions and opinions from experts around the world. The official publication of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信