Discrepancies between CSF biomarker and PET determinations of elevated brain amyloid and their prognostic significance

IF 13 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
David S. Knopman, Stephen D. Weigand, Heather J. Wiste, Jonathan Graff-Radford, Neill R. Graff-Radford, Ronald C. Petersen, Bradley F. Boeve, Clifford R Jack Jr, Val J. Lowe, Mary M. Machulda, Julie A. Fields, Vijay K. Ramanan, Hugo Botha, Stuart J. McCarter, David T. Jones, Bryan J. Neth, Gregory S. Day, Kejal Kantarci, Alicia Algeciras-Schimnich, Joshua A. Bornhorst, Derek R. Johnson, and the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
{"title":"Discrepancies between CSF biomarker and PET determinations of elevated brain amyloid and their prognostic significance","authors":"David S. Knopman,&nbsp;Stephen D. Weigand,&nbsp;Heather J. Wiste,&nbsp;Jonathan Graff-Radford,&nbsp;Neill R. Graff-Radford,&nbsp;Ronald C. Petersen,&nbsp;Bradley F. Boeve,&nbsp;Clifford R Jack Jr,&nbsp;Val J. Lowe,&nbsp;Mary M. Machulda,&nbsp;Julie A. Fields,&nbsp;Vijay K. Ramanan,&nbsp;Hugo Botha,&nbsp;Stuart J. McCarter,&nbsp;David T. Jones,&nbsp;Bryan J. Neth,&nbsp;Gregory S. Day,&nbsp;Kejal Kantarci,&nbsp;Alicia Algeciras-Schimnich,&nbsp;Joshua A. Bornhorst,&nbsp;Derek R. Johnson,&nbsp;and the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative","doi":"10.1002/alz.70468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3>\n \n <p>When cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and positron emission tomography (PET) measurements for amyloid-beta-peptide (Aβ) related pathology are discordant, therapeutic decision-making becomes uncertain.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> METHODS</h3>\n \n <p>Using data from patients with mild cognitive impairment (<i>n</i> = 541) from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, we examined baseline characteristics and longitudinal clinical outcomes in persons grouped according to normal/abnormal Aβ via concurrent CSF and PET determinations using standard cutpoints.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> RESULTS</h3>\n \n <p>Discordant groups for brain Aβ status (CSF+/PET− and CSF−/PET+) each represented about 5% of the mild cognitive impairment (MCI) population. Longitudinally, neither discordant group declined more than the CSF−/PET− group on either a memory measure or the Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes scores over a median 4 years of observation, while the CSF+/PET+ group exhibited worsening on both measures.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> DISCUSSION</h3>\n \n <p>In contrast to the clinical decline observed in the CSF+/PET+ group, persons with MCI and CSF+/PET− or CSF−/PET+ brain amyloid patterns did not exhibit incipient decline.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Highlights</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Discrepant abnormal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and positron emission tomography (PET) brain amyloid indicators are uncommon in mild cognitive impairment (MCI).</li>\n \n <li>CSF-PET discrepant persons with MCI tend to have less abnormal values initially.</li>\n \n <li>CSF-PET discrepant persons with MCI have a benign prognosis at 4 years.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"21 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/alz.70468","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alz.70468","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

When cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and positron emission tomography (PET) measurements for amyloid-beta-peptide (Aβ) related pathology are discordant, therapeutic decision-making becomes uncertain.

METHODS

Using data from patients with mild cognitive impairment (n = 541) from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, we examined baseline characteristics and longitudinal clinical outcomes in persons grouped according to normal/abnormal Aβ via concurrent CSF and PET determinations using standard cutpoints.

RESULTS

Discordant groups for brain Aβ status (CSF+/PET− and CSF−/PET+) each represented about 5% of the mild cognitive impairment (MCI) population. Longitudinally, neither discordant group declined more than the CSF−/PET− group on either a memory measure or the Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes scores over a median 4 years of observation, while the CSF+/PET+ group exhibited worsening on both measures.

DISCUSSION

In contrast to the clinical decline observed in the CSF+/PET+ group, persons with MCI and CSF+/PET− or CSF−/PET+ brain amyloid patterns did not exhibit incipient decline.

Highlights

  • Discrepant abnormal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and positron emission tomography (PET) brain amyloid indicators are uncommon in mild cognitive impairment (MCI).
  • CSF-PET discrepant persons with MCI tend to have less abnormal values initially.
  • CSF-PET discrepant persons with MCI have a benign prognosis at 4 years.

Abstract Image

脑脊液生物标志物与PET测定脑淀粉样蛋白升高的差异及其预后意义
当脑脊液(CSF)和正电子发射断层扫描(PET)测量淀粉样蛋白- β肽(Aβ)相关病理不一致时,治疗决策变得不确定。方法:使用来自阿尔茨海默病神经影像学计划(Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative)的轻度认知障碍患者(n = 541)的数据,我们通过使用标准截断点同时进行CSF和PET测定,检查了根据Aβ正常/异常分组的患者的基线特征和纵向临床结果。结果脑Aβ状态不一致组(CSF+/PET -和CSF - /PET+)各占轻度认知障碍(MCI)人群的5%左右。纵向上,在中位4年的观察中,不协调组在记忆测量或临床痴呆评分盒和得分上的下降都没有CSF - /PET -组大,而CSF+/PET+组在两项指标上都表现出恶化。与CSF+/PET+组观察到的临床下降相反,MCI和CSF+/PET -或CSF - /PET+脑淀粉样蛋白模式的人没有表现出早期的下降。脑脊液(CSF)和正电子发射断层扫描(PET)异常的脑淀粉样蛋白指标在轻度认知障碍(MCI)中并不常见。MCI的CSF-PET不一致者最初的异常值较少。CSF-PET不一致的MCI患者4年预后良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Alzheimer's & Dementia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
299
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's & Dementia is a peer-reviewed journal that aims to bridge knowledge gaps in dementia research by covering the entire spectrum, from basic science to clinical trials to social and behavioral investigations. It provides a platform for rapid communication of new findings and ideas, optimal translation of research into practical applications, increasing knowledge across diverse disciplines for early detection, diagnosis, and intervention, and identifying promising new research directions. In July 2008, Alzheimer's & Dementia was accepted for indexing by MEDLINE, recognizing its scientific merit and contribution to Alzheimer's research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信