The Journey of Forced Choice Measurement Over 80 Years: Past, Present, and Future

IF 8.9 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Philseok Lee, Mina Son, Steven Zhou, Sean Joo, Zihao Jia, Virginia Cheng
{"title":"The Journey of Forced Choice Measurement Over 80 Years: Past, Present, and Future","authors":"Philseok Lee, Mina Son, Steven Zhou, Sean Joo, Zihao Jia, Virginia Cheng","doi":"10.1177/10944281251350687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past two decades, forced-choice (FC) measures have received considerable attention from researchers and practitioners in industrial and organizational psychology. Despite the growing body of research on FC measures, there has not yet been a comprehensive review synthesizing the diverse lines of research. This article bridges this gap by presenting a systematic review of post-2000 literature on FC measures, addressing ten critical questions, including: 1) validity evidence, 2) faking resistance, 3) FC IRT models, 4) FC test design, 5) FC measure development, 6) test-taker reactions and response processes, 7) measurement and predictive bias, 8) reliability, 9) computerized adaptive testing, and 10) random responding. The review adopts a historical perspective, tracing the development of FC measures and highlighting key empirical findings, methodological advances, current trends, and future directions. By synthesizing a substantial body of evidence across multiple research streams, this article serves as a valuable resource, providing insights into the psychometric properties, theoretical underpinnings, and practical applications of FC measures in organizational contexts such as personnel selection, development, and assessment.","PeriodicalId":19689,"journal":{"name":"Organizational Research Methods","volume":"109 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organizational Research Methods","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281251350687","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past two decades, forced-choice (FC) measures have received considerable attention from researchers and practitioners in industrial and organizational psychology. Despite the growing body of research on FC measures, there has not yet been a comprehensive review synthesizing the diverse lines of research. This article bridges this gap by presenting a systematic review of post-2000 literature on FC measures, addressing ten critical questions, including: 1) validity evidence, 2) faking resistance, 3) FC IRT models, 4) FC test design, 5) FC measure development, 6) test-taker reactions and response processes, 7) measurement and predictive bias, 8) reliability, 9) computerized adaptive testing, and 10) random responding. The review adopts a historical perspective, tracing the development of FC measures and highlighting key empirical findings, methodological advances, current trends, and future directions. By synthesizing a substantial body of evidence across multiple research streams, this article serves as a valuable resource, providing insights into the psychometric properties, theoretical underpinnings, and practical applications of FC measures in organizational contexts such as personnel selection, development, and assessment.
80多年的强迫选择测量之旅:过去、现在和未来
在过去的二十年里,强迫选择(FC)措施受到了工业和组织心理学研究者和实践者的极大关注。尽管对FC措施的研究越来越多,但还没有一个综合不同研究方向的全面综述。本文通过对2000年后关于FC测量的文献进行系统回顾,解决了十个关键问题,包括:1)效度证据,2)伪造阻力,3)FC IRT模型,4)FC测试设计,5)FC测量开发,6)考生反应和反应过程,7)测量和预测偏差,8)可靠性,9)计算机化自适应测试,10)随机响应。本文采用了历史视角,追溯了FC测量方法的发展,强调了关键的实证发现、方法进展、当前趋势和未来方向。通过综合多个研究流的大量证据,本文提供了有价值的资源,提供了对FC测量在组织环境(如人员选择、发展和评估)中的心理测量特性、理论基础和实际应用的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
23.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Organizational Research Methods (ORM) was founded with the aim of introducing pertinent methodological advancements to researchers in organizational sciences. The objective of ORM is to promote the application of current and emerging methodologies to advance both theory and research practices. Articles are expected to be comprehensible to readers with a background consistent with the methodological and statistical training provided in contemporary organizational sciences doctoral programs. The text should be presented in a manner that facilitates accessibility. For instance, highly technical content should be placed in appendices, and authors are encouraged to include example data and computer code when relevant. Additionally, authors should explicitly outline how their contribution has the potential to advance organizational theory and research practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信