Development, Reliability, and Validity of Comprehensive Frailty Assessment Tool for Older Adults with Cancer (FOAC) in China.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Clinical Interventions in Aging Pub Date : 2025-07-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CIA.S512322
Nannan Jiang, Azidah Abdul Kadir, Hui Xie, Li Wang, Hua Yu, Intan Idiana Hassan
{"title":"Development, Reliability, and Validity of Comprehensive Frailty Assessment Tool for Older Adults with Cancer (FOAC) in China.","authors":"Nannan Jiang, Azidah Abdul Kadir, Hui Xie, Li Wang, Hua Yu, Intan Idiana Hassan","doi":"10.2147/CIA.S512322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>With the accelerating ageing population, frailty has emerged as a critical concern among older cancer patients. The purpose of the study was to develop a valid and reliable Comprehensive Frailty Assessment Tool for Older Adults with Cancer (FOAC) in China.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The FOAC was developed in 4 phases. Phase 1: Conceptualization and Item Generation:32 items were formulated from the literature. Phase 2: Content validation of the FOAC by modified Delphi method. Phase 3: Face validity index (FVI) was calculated by recording the views of two groups, including older adults with cancer and those with professional roles. Phase 4:Using CGA-determined frailty as the dependent variable, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted using FOAC, FP, and aCGA frailty screening scales as independent variables and their area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, cut-off value, predicted value, and accuracy were determined. Internal consistency reliability measurement was assessed with Cronbach's alpha.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FOAC has 30 items. Physiological dimension (11 items). Psychological & cognitive dimension (12 items). Social support (7 items). the results of this study demonstrated that the overall Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was 0.869.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The FOAC is a valid and reliable frailty screening tool that significantly addresses the problems of existing frailty assessment tools, such as single dimension, low sensitivity, complex scoring, and insufficient clinical applicability. It contributes to guiding healthcare professionals in providing more accurate diagnosis, treatment, and cancer management for older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":48841,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Interventions in Aging","volume":"20 ","pages":"951-967"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12228490/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Interventions in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S512322","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: With the accelerating ageing population, frailty has emerged as a critical concern among older cancer patients. The purpose of the study was to develop a valid and reliable Comprehensive Frailty Assessment Tool for Older Adults with Cancer (FOAC) in China.

Patients and methods: The FOAC was developed in 4 phases. Phase 1: Conceptualization and Item Generation:32 items were formulated from the literature. Phase 2: Content validation of the FOAC by modified Delphi method. Phase 3: Face validity index (FVI) was calculated by recording the views of two groups, including older adults with cancer and those with professional roles. Phase 4:Using CGA-determined frailty as the dependent variable, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted using FOAC, FP, and aCGA frailty screening scales as independent variables and their area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, cut-off value, predicted value, and accuracy were determined. Internal consistency reliability measurement was assessed with Cronbach's alpha.

Results: The FOAC has 30 items. Physiological dimension (11 items). Psychological & cognitive dimension (12 items). Social support (7 items). the results of this study demonstrated that the overall Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was 0.869.

Conclusion: The FOAC is a valid and reliable frailty screening tool that significantly addresses the problems of existing frailty assessment tools, such as single dimension, low sensitivity, complex scoring, and insufficient clinical applicability. It contributes to guiding healthcare professionals in providing more accurate diagnosis, treatment, and cancer management for older adults.

中国老年癌症患者虚弱综合评估工具(FOAC)的开发、信度和效度
目的:随着人口老龄化的加速,虚弱已经成为老年癌症患者的一个关键问题。本研究的目的是开发一种有效可靠的中国老年癌症患者衰弱综合评估工具(FOAC)。患者和方法:FOAC分为4个阶段。第一阶段:概念化和项目生成:从文献中制定32个项目。第二阶段:采用改进的德尔菲法对FOAC进行内容验证。第三阶段:面部效度指数(Face validity index, FVI)通过记录老年癌症患者和职业角色老年人两组的观点来计算。第4阶段:以cga确定的脆性为因变量,以FOAC、FP、aCGA脆性筛查量表为自变量,进行受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析,确定其曲线下面积(AUC)、敏感性、特异性、截止值、预测值、准确性。内部一致性信度测量采用Cronbach’s alpha评价。结果:FOAC共有30个项目。生理维度(11项)。心理认知维度(12项)。社会支持(7项)。本研究结果表明,量表的总体Cronbach’s alpha系数为0.869。结论:FOAC是一种有效、可靠的虚弱筛查工具,显著解决了现有虚弱评估工具维度单一、灵敏度低、评分复杂、临床适用性不足等问题。它有助于指导医疗保健专业人员为老年人提供更准确的诊断、治疗和癌症管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Interventions in Aging
Clinical Interventions in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
193
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Interventions in Aging, is an online, peer reviewed, open access journal focusing on concise rapid reporting of original research and reviews in aging. Special attention will be given to papers reporting on actual or potential clinical applications leading to improved prevention or treatment of disease or a greater understanding of pathological processes that result from maladaptive changes in the body associated with aging. This journal is directed at a wide array of scientists, engineers, pharmacists, pharmacologists and clinical specialists wishing to maintain an up to date knowledge of this exciting and emerging field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信