From Bane to Boon: How Global Fortune 500 Companies Disclose About Using Servitisation and Industry 4.0 as Circular Economy Strategy

IF 8.3 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Sehrish Atif, Abeer Hassan
{"title":"From Bane to Boon: How Global Fortune 500 Companies Disclose About Using Servitisation and Industry 4.0 as Circular Economy Strategy","authors":"Sehrish Atif,&nbsp;Abeer Hassan","doi":"10.1002/csr.3232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigates the interplay between circular economy (CE) practices, Servitisation, and Industry 4.0 (I4.0) within the context of global Fortune 500 companies' disclosure practices examining how the sample reports on the use of Servitisation and I4.0 technologies as CE strategy across three phases: resource reduction, product lifecycle extension, and material recovery. Using content analysis and quantitative methods over a five-year period (2018–2022). Findings indicate that while Servitisation and I4.0 positively influence early CE phases, I4.0's impact on recycling and recovery (CE-Phase 3) is limited when control variables are considered. This suggests challenges in fully integrating I4.0 with advanced CE activities. The study contributes to the theoretical frameworks of resource-based view (RBV) and dynamic capabilities theory (DCT) by illustrating how firms leverage their internal resources and capabilities to enhance their CE-related disclosure practices through the adoption of Servitisation and I4.0 technologies. The findings suggest that companies must develop dynamic capabilities to adapt and integrate these technologies into their business models, particularly when transitioning to more advanced CE activities. The findings highlight the need for companies to develop dynamic capabilities to integrate I4.0 into advanced CE strategies to enhance transparency in their disclosure practices. Additionally, this study provides insights for regulatory bodies to refine CE disclosure guidelines and support businesses in overcoming implementation challenges. Future research should explore specific I4.0 technologies, the accountability challenges in CE transitions, and their impact on sustainability reporting frameworks.</p>","PeriodicalId":48334,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management","volume":"32 4","pages":"5277-5301"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/csr.3232","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/csr.3232","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the interplay between circular economy (CE) practices, Servitisation, and Industry 4.0 (I4.0) within the context of global Fortune 500 companies' disclosure practices examining how the sample reports on the use of Servitisation and I4.0 technologies as CE strategy across three phases: resource reduction, product lifecycle extension, and material recovery. Using content analysis and quantitative methods over a five-year period (2018–2022). Findings indicate that while Servitisation and I4.0 positively influence early CE phases, I4.0's impact on recycling and recovery (CE-Phase 3) is limited when control variables are considered. This suggests challenges in fully integrating I4.0 with advanced CE activities. The study contributes to the theoretical frameworks of resource-based view (RBV) and dynamic capabilities theory (DCT) by illustrating how firms leverage their internal resources and capabilities to enhance their CE-related disclosure practices through the adoption of Servitisation and I4.0 technologies. The findings suggest that companies must develop dynamic capabilities to adapt and integrate these technologies into their business models, particularly when transitioning to more advanced CE activities. The findings highlight the need for companies to develop dynamic capabilities to integrate I4.0 into advanced CE strategies to enhance transparency in their disclosure practices. Additionally, this study provides insights for regulatory bodies to refine CE disclosure guidelines and support businesses in overcoming implementation challenges. Future research should explore specific I4.0 technologies, the accountability challenges in CE transitions, and their impact on sustainability reporting frameworks.

Abstract Image

从祸到福:世界500强企业如何披露将服务化和工业4.0作为循环经济战略
本研究在全球财富500强公司披露实践的背景下,调查了循环经济(CE)实践、服务化和工业4.0 (I4.0)之间的相互作用,研究了样本如何报告服务化和工业4.0技术作为CE战略在三个阶段的使用:资源减少、产品生命周期延长和材料回收。使用内容分析和定量方法,为期五年(2018-2022年)。研究结果表明,虽然服务化和工业4.0对早期CE阶段有积极影响,但当考虑控制变量时,工业4.0对循环和回收(CE阶段3)的影响有限。这表明在将工业4.0与高级CE活动完全整合方面存在挑战。该研究通过阐述企业如何利用其内部资源和能力,通过采用服务化和工业4.0技术来增强其与企业绩效相关的披露实践,为资源基础观点(RBV)和动态能力理论(DCT)的理论框架做出了贡献。研究结果表明,公司必须发展动态能力,以适应并将这些技术集成到他们的商业模式中,特别是在向更先进的CE活动过渡时。研究结果强调,企业需要发展动态能力,将工业4.0整合到先进的环保战略中,以提高其信息披露实践的透明度。此外,本研究为监管机构完善CE披露指南和支持企业克服实施挑战提供了见解。未来的研究应该探索具体的工业4.0技术,在CE转型中的问责挑战,以及它们对可持续发展报告框架的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.20
自引率
16.30%
发文量
189
期刊介绍: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management is a journal that publishes both theoretical and practical contributions related to the social and environmental responsibilities of businesses in the context of sustainable development. It covers a wide range of topics, including tools and practices associated with these responsibilities, case studies, and cross-country surveys of best practices. The journal aims to help organizations improve their performance and accountability in these areas. The main focus of the journal is on research and practical advice for the development and assessment of social responsibility and environmental tools. It also features practical case studies and evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of different approaches to sustainability. The journal encourages the discussion and debate of sustainability issues and closely monitors the demands of various stakeholder groups. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management is a refereed journal, meaning that all contributions undergo a rigorous review process. It seeks high-quality contributions that appeal to a diverse audience from various disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信