T.D. Diallo , S. Wiedemann , Z. Berkarda , R. Strecker , D. Nickel , F. Bamberg , A. Rau , T. Mayrhofer , M.F. Russe , J. Weiss
{"title":"Ultra-fast single-sequence magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for lower back pain: diagnostic performance of a deep learning T2-Dixon pprotocol","authors":"T.D. Diallo , S. Wiedemann , Z. Berkarda , R. Strecker , D. Nickel , F. Bamberg , A. Rau , T. Mayrhofer , M.F. Russe , J. Weiss","doi":"10.1016/j.crad.2025.106987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols for lower back pain require multiple sequences and long acquisition times, challenging healthcare systems amid rising demand for lumbar spine imaging.</div></div><div><h3>AIM</h3><div>To assess the diagnostic performance of an abbreviated, deep learning-accelerated sagittal T2w Dixon single sequence protocol (Protocol<sub>abb-DL</sub>) versus the standard lumbar spine MRI protocol (Protocol<sub>std</sub>).</div></div><div><h3>MATERIALS AND METHODS</h3><div>In this prospective, single-centre study, 30 patients (mean age: 48 ± 18.5 years; 67% female) with lower back pain (LBP) underwent a single MRI examination using both Protocol<sub>std</sub> (sagittal T1w and T2w turbo spin-echo sequences) and Protocol<sub>abb-DL</sub>. A senior radiologist (15 years experience) established the diagnostic reference standard using Protocol<sub>std</sub>. Two independent readers (10 and 5 years’ experience) evaluated the images at a segmental level for degenerative pathologies, including Modic changes, disc pathology, facet arthropathy, neuroforaminal stenosis, and Schmorl nodes. Diagnostic performance, confidence, interprotocol, and interobserver agreements were analysed.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>Protocol<sub>abb-DL</sub> reduced acquisition time by 80% at 1.5 Tesla (1:33 vs 7:43 minutes) and 84% at 3 Tesla (1:26 vs 8:43 minutes). Diagnostic performance was high, with sensitivities up to 100% [95% CI, 90.7–100.0] for Modic changes and 94.7% [95% CI, 87.1–98.5] for disc pathology, and specificities up to 100% [95% CI, 97.8–100.0] for Schmorl nodes. Diagnostic confidence was comparable between protocols (<em>P</em> > 0.05). Interprotocol agreement was excellent (κ: 0.84–1.00), and interobserver agreement for Protocol<sub>abb-DL</sub> was substantial to excellent (κ: 0.67–0.93).</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>Protocol<sub>abb-DL</sub> provides diagnostic performance comparable to Protocol<sub>std</sub> for degenerative lumbar spine pathologies while reducing acquisition time by up to 84%.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10695,"journal":{"name":"Clinical radiology","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 106987"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009926025001928","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols for lower back pain require multiple sequences and long acquisition times, challenging healthcare systems amid rising demand for lumbar spine imaging.
AIM
To assess the diagnostic performance of an abbreviated, deep learning-accelerated sagittal T2w Dixon single sequence protocol (Protocolabb-DL) versus the standard lumbar spine MRI protocol (Protocolstd).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
In this prospective, single-centre study, 30 patients (mean age: 48 ± 18.5 years; 67% female) with lower back pain (LBP) underwent a single MRI examination using both Protocolstd (sagittal T1w and T2w turbo spin-echo sequences) and Protocolabb-DL. A senior radiologist (15 years experience) established the diagnostic reference standard using Protocolstd. Two independent readers (10 and 5 years’ experience) evaluated the images at a segmental level for degenerative pathologies, including Modic changes, disc pathology, facet arthropathy, neuroforaminal stenosis, and Schmorl nodes. Diagnostic performance, confidence, interprotocol, and interobserver agreements were analysed.
RESULTS
Protocolabb-DL reduced acquisition time by 80% at 1.5 Tesla (1:33 vs 7:43 minutes) and 84% at 3 Tesla (1:26 vs 8:43 minutes). Diagnostic performance was high, with sensitivities up to 100% [95% CI, 90.7–100.0] for Modic changes and 94.7% [95% CI, 87.1–98.5] for disc pathology, and specificities up to 100% [95% CI, 97.8–100.0] for Schmorl nodes. Diagnostic confidence was comparable between protocols (P > 0.05). Interprotocol agreement was excellent (κ: 0.84–1.00), and interobserver agreement for Protocolabb-DL was substantial to excellent (κ: 0.67–0.93).
CONCLUSION
Protocolabb-DL provides diagnostic performance comparable to Protocolstd for degenerative lumbar spine pathologies while reducing acquisition time by up to 84%.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Radiology is published by Elsevier on behalf of The Royal College of Radiologists. Clinical Radiology is an International Journal bringing you original research, editorials and review articles on all aspects of diagnostic imaging, including:
• Computed tomography
• Magnetic resonance imaging
• Ultrasonography
• Digital radiology
• Interventional radiology
• Radiography
• Nuclear medicine
Papers on radiological protection, quality assurance, audit in radiology and matters relating to radiological training and education are also included. In addition, each issue contains correspondence, book reviews and notices of forthcoming events.