Digesting the truth: The role of energy justice in perception of anaerobic digestion plants in Central Europe rural space

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Tomáš Krejčí , Stanislav Martinát , Petr Dvořák , Marián Kulla , Petr Klusáček , Kamil Pícha , Ladislav Novotný , Loránt Pregi , Josef Navrátil
{"title":"Digesting the truth: The role of energy justice in perception of anaerobic digestion plants in Central Europe rural space","authors":"Tomáš Krejčí ,&nbsp;Stanislav Martinát ,&nbsp;Petr Dvořák ,&nbsp;Marián Kulla ,&nbsp;Petr Klusáček ,&nbsp;Kamil Pícha ,&nbsp;Ladislav Novotný ,&nbsp;Loránt Pregi ,&nbsp;Josef Navrátil","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Anaerobic digestion (AD) plants are integral to the circular economy, yet they are often the subject of significant local controversy, particularly during operation. This contrasts sharply with the acceptance trajectories of other renewables and poses a significant barrier to their broader utilization. To explore the roots of this phenomenon, the present study focused on the significance of selected particular factors related to energy justice. Based on a questionnaire survey (<em>N</em> = 446) in four rural communities in the Czech Republic and Slovakia where AD plants are located, we evaluated how procedural, distributive, and recognition justice shape residents' perceptions of the existence of anaerobic digestion plants in Central Europe conditions. The results of ordinal logistic regression show that procedural justice is the most critical factor for positive perception. Specifically, the perceived opportunity for residents to participate in planning and the operator's responsiveness to subsequent concerns were identified as the most significant predictors of acceptance. Our findings highlight that the continuous improvement of the plant operator's relations with other local groups (municipality, residents, and local business entities) is not an option but a fundamental prerequisite for achieving energy justice in biogas utilization and the integration of AD plants as vital renewable energy sources.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 104210"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625002919","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion (AD) plants are integral to the circular economy, yet they are often the subject of significant local controversy, particularly during operation. This contrasts sharply with the acceptance trajectories of other renewables and poses a significant barrier to their broader utilization. To explore the roots of this phenomenon, the present study focused on the significance of selected particular factors related to energy justice. Based on a questionnaire survey (N = 446) in four rural communities in the Czech Republic and Slovakia where AD plants are located, we evaluated how procedural, distributive, and recognition justice shape residents' perceptions of the existence of anaerobic digestion plants in Central Europe conditions. The results of ordinal logistic regression show that procedural justice is the most critical factor for positive perception. Specifically, the perceived opportunity for residents to participate in planning and the operator's responsiveness to subsequent concerns were identified as the most significant predictors of acceptance. Our findings highlight that the continuous improvement of the plant operator's relations with other local groups (municipality, residents, and local business entities) is not an option but a fundamental prerequisite for achieving energy justice in biogas utilization and the integration of AD plants as vital renewable energy sources.
消化真相:能源正义在中欧农村空间厌氧消化植物感知中的作用
厌氧消化(AD)工厂是循环经济不可或缺的一部分,但它们往往是当地重大争议的主题,特别是在运行期间。这与其他可再生能源的接受轨迹形成鲜明对比,并对其更广泛的利用构成了重大障碍。为了探究这一现象的根源,本研究侧重于选择与能源公平相关的特定因素的意义。基于问卷调查(N = 446),我们在捷克共和国和斯洛伐克的四个农村社区进行了AD工厂的调查,我们评估了程序,分配和识别正义如何影响中欧条件下居民对厌氧消化工厂存在的看法。有序逻辑回归结果显示,程序公正是产生积极感知的最关键因素。具体而言,居民参与规划的感知机会和运营商对后续问题的响应被认为是接受度的最重要预测因素。我们的研究结果强调,持续改善工厂运营商与其他当地团体(市政当局、居民和当地商业实体)的关系不是一种选择,而是实现沼气利用和AD工厂作为重要可再生能源整合的能源正义的基本先决条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信