Interference screw and suture anchor fixation for lateral extra-articular tenodesis yield no significant differences in load to failure, while staple fixation lags behind: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study.

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Ron Gilat, Zeeshan A Khan, Juan Bernardo Villareal-Espinosa, Andrew S Bi, Harkirat S Jawanda, Garrett R Jackson, Safa Gursoy, Enzo S Mameri, Elizabeth F Shewman, Daniel J Kaplan, Pablo E Gelber, Jorge Chahla
{"title":"Interference screw and suture anchor fixation for lateral extra-articular tenodesis yield no significant differences in load to failure, while staple fixation lags behind: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study.","authors":"Ron Gilat, Zeeshan A Khan, Juan Bernardo Villareal-Espinosa, Andrew S Bi, Harkirat S Jawanda, Garrett R Jackson, Safa Gursoy, Enzo S Mameri, Elizabeth F Shewman, Daniel J Kaplan, Pablo E Gelber, Jorge Chahla","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.06.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the biomechanical properties and failure mechanisms of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) performed using onlay staple, inlay interference screw, and onlay all-suture anchor fixation techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four non-matched pairs of human cadaveric knees were randomized to receive either a cortical staple (n=8), interference screw (n=8), or all-suture anchor (n=8). A modified Lemaire LET technique was performed for all knees using their respective fixation technique. Biomechanical testing was performed using a tensile-testing apparatus (MTS Systems). All knees were subjected to an axially directed pre-load cycle and subsequently assessed for cyclic and load-to-failure outcomes. Results were analyzed via analysis of variance (ANOVA), Kruskal-Wallis, and post-hoc Tukey´s tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three staple-fixated LETs failed during the cyclic loading and were excluded from analysis. Average elongation after cyclic loading was 2.89 millimeters (mm) (staple), 2.06 mm (screw), and 3.51 mm (anchor) (p = 0.134). Average maximum load to failure was 174.1 N (staple), 250.8 N (screw), and 199.2 N (anchor) with a significant between-group difference on ANOVA testing (p = 0.023). Post-hoc analysis revealed staple fixation had a significantly lower maximum load than interference screw fixation (p=0.026). Displacement at maximum load was significantly higher in the anchor group (22.2 mm) compared to the staple (11.3 mm) (p=0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While staple fixation resulted in early failure (174 N), both interference screw and anchor fixations (250 N and 199 N, respectively) are viable options for LET, with suture anchors offering less rigidity under high loads when compared with either fixation strategy. However, no differences were observed in elongation during cyclic loading.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Emerging literature has revealed a 70% tunnel convergence rate when utilizing an interference screw for femoral fixation of a LET. The results of the present time-zero cadaveric study explores the role of surface-based fixation methods, given that it may mitigate convergence risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2025.06.029","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the biomechanical properties and failure mechanisms of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) performed using onlay staple, inlay interference screw, and onlay all-suture anchor fixation techniques.

Methods: Twenty-four non-matched pairs of human cadaveric knees were randomized to receive either a cortical staple (n=8), interference screw (n=8), or all-suture anchor (n=8). A modified Lemaire LET technique was performed for all knees using their respective fixation technique. Biomechanical testing was performed using a tensile-testing apparatus (MTS Systems). All knees were subjected to an axially directed pre-load cycle and subsequently assessed for cyclic and load-to-failure outcomes. Results were analyzed via analysis of variance (ANOVA), Kruskal-Wallis, and post-hoc Tukey´s tests.

Results: Three staple-fixated LETs failed during the cyclic loading and were excluded from analysis. Average elongation after cyclic loading was 2.89 millimeters (mm) (staple), 2.06 mm (screw), and 3.51 mm (anchor) (p = 0.134). Average maximum load to failure was 174.1 N (staple), 250.8 N (screw), and 199.2 N (anchor) with a significant between-group difference on ANOVA testing (p = 0.023). Post-hoc analysis revealed staple fixation had a significantly lower maximum load than interference screw fixation (p=0.026). Displacement at maximum load was significantly higher in the anchor group (22.2 mm) compared to the staple (11.3 mm) (p=0.05).

Conclusion: While staple fixation resulted in early failure (174 N), both interference screw and anchor fixations (250 N and 199 N, respectively) are viable options for LET, with suture anchors offering less rigidity under high loads when compared with either fixation strategy. However, no differences were observed in elongation during cyclic loading.

Clinical relevance: Emerging literature has revealed a 70% tunnel convergence rate when utilizing an interference screw for femoral fixation of a LET. The results of the present time-zero cadaveric study explores the role of surface-based fixation methods, given that it may mitigate convergence risk.

干涉螺钉和缝线锚定固定用于外侧关节外肌腱固定术在载荷到失败方面没有显著差异,而钉钉固定滞后:一项尸体生物力学研究。
目的:评价采用嵌体钉、嵌体干涉螺钉和嵌体全缝线锚钉固定技术进行外侧关节外肌腱固定术(LET)的生物力学特性和失效机制。方法:24对不匹配的人尸体膝盖随机接受皮质钉(n=8),干涉螺钉(n=8)或全缝合锚(n=8)。采用改良的Lemaire LET技术对所有膝关节采用各自的固定技术。生物力学试验采用拉伸试验装置(MTS Systems)。所有膝关节都进行了轴向预载荷循环,随后评估了循环和载荷失效结果。结果通过方差分析(ANOVA)、Kruskal-Wallis检验和事后Tukey检验进行分析。结果:3个钉固定let在循环加载中失效,排除在分析之外。循环加载后的平均伸长率为2.89毫米(钉),2.06毫米(螺钉)和3.51毫米(锚)(p = 0.134)。到失效的平均最大载荷为174.1 N(钉钉),250.8 N(螺钉)和199.2 N(锚),方差分析(ANOVA)组间差异显著(p = 0.023)。事后分析显示,钉钉固定的最大负荷显著低于干涉螺钉固定(p=0.026)。在最大载荷下,锚钉组的位移(22.2 mm)明显高于钉钉组(11.3 mm) (p=0.05)。结论:虽然短钉固定导致早期失败(174 N),但干涉螺钉和锚钉固定(分别为250 N和199 N)是治疗LET的可行选择,与任何一种固定策略相比,缝线锚钉在高负荷下提供更小的刚性。然而,在循环加载期间,伸长率没有观察到差异。临床相关性:最新文献显示,使用干涉螺钉股骨内固定LET时,隧道收敛率为70%。目前的零时间尸体研究的结果探讨了基于表面的固定方法的作用,因为它可以减轻收敛风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信