Dobutamine Use in Patients With Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Secondary Analysis of the SAVE-J II Study.
{"title":"Dobutamine Use in Patients With Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Secondary Analysis of the SAVE-J II Study.","authors":"Tasuku Hada, Toru Hifumi, Hiromu Okano, Kasumi Shirasaki, Shutaro Isokawa, Akihiko Inoue, Tetsuya Sakamoto, Yasuhiro Kuroda, Norio Otani","doi":"10.1111/aor.15055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effects of dobutamine on outcomes in patients experiencing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), remain unclear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the association between dobutamine use within 24 h and clinical outcomes in patients with OHCA who underwent ECPR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A post hoc analysis was conducted on the registry data from the SAVE-J II study (2013-2018). To address potential confounding variables related to dobutamine administration, 1:3 propensity score matching was employed using the patients' baseline characteristics. Following the matching, the dobutamine and non-dobutamine groups were compared, focusing on in-hospital mortality and neurological outcomes assessed using the cerebral performance category (CPC) scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2157 registered cases, 581 cases of cardiogenic OHCA treated with targeted temperature management were included in this analysis. Eighty-eight patients who received dobutamine were compared with 264 who did not after propensity score matching. The in-hospital mortality rate was 60.2% in the dobutamine group, compared with 58.3% in the non-dobutamine group (p = 0.80). The proportion of patients with a CPC score of 3-5 at hospital discharge was 79.5% in the dobutamine group, compared with 78.0% in the non-dobutamine group (p = 0.88). A Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated no significant differences in survival rates between the two groups (42.1 vs. 43.6%, log-rank p = 0.79).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with OHCA who underwent ECPR, dobutamine administration within 24 h was not significantly associated with in-hospital mortality and neurological outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8450,"journal":{"name":"Artificial organs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial organs","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.15055","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The effects of dobutamine on outcomes in patients experiencing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), remain unclear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the association between dobutamine use within 24 h and clinical outcomes in patients with OHCA who underwent ECPR.
Methods: A post hoc analysis was conducted on the registry data from the SAVE-J II study (2013-2018). To address potential confounding variables related to dobutamine administration, 1:3 propensity score matching was employed using the patients' baseline characteristics. Following the matching, the dobutamine and non-dobutamine groups were compared, focusing on in-hospital mortality and neurological outcomes assessed using the cerebral performance category (CPC) scale.
Results: Of the 2157 registered cases, 581 cases of cardiogenic OHCA treated with targeted temperature management were included in this analysis. Eighty-eight patients who received dobutamine were compared with 264 who did not after propensity score matching. The in-hospital mortality rate was 60.2% in the dobutamine group, compared with 58.3% in the non-dobutamine group (p = 0.80). The proportion of patients with a CPC score of 3-5 at hospital discharge was 79.5% in the dobutamine group, compared with 78.0% in the non-dobutamine group (p = 0.88). A Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated no significant differences in survival rates between the two groups (42.1 vs. 43.6%, log-rank p = 0.79).
Conclusion: In patients with OHCA who underwent ECPR, dobutamine administration within 24 h was not significantly associated with in-hospital mortality and neurological outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Artificial Organs is the official peer reviewed journal of The International Federation for Artificial Organs (Members of the Federation are: The American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, The European Society for Artificial Organs, and The Japanese Society for Artificial Organs), The International Faculty for Artificial Organs, the International Society for Rotary Blood Pumps, The International Society for Pediatric Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Support, and the Vienna International Workshop on Functional Electrical Stimulation. Artificial Organs publishes original research articles dealing with developments in artificial organs applications and treatment modalities and their clinical applications worldwide. Membership in the Societies listed above is not a prerequisite for publication. Articles are published without charge to the author except for color figures and excess page charges as noted.