OUTCOMES OF DIFFUSE LARGE B-CELL LYMPHOMA IN OLDER ADULTS TREATED IN RESOURCE-CONSTRAINED SETTINGS

IF 1.6 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Natasha Ali , Raheel Iftikhar , Zeeshan Khan , Usman Ahmed , Humera Mahmood , Zeba Aziz
{"title":"OUTCOMES OF DIFFUSE LARGE B-CELL LYMPHOMA IN OLDER ADULTS TREATED IN RESOURCE-CONSTRAINED SETTINGS","authors":"Natasha Ali ,&nbsp;Raheel Iftikhar ,&nbsp;Zeeshan Khan ,&nbsp;Usman Ahmed ,&nbsp;Humera Mahmood ,&nbsp;Zeba Aziz","doi":"10.1016/j.htct.2025.103893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Treating Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) in elderly patients is challenging. There is limited data available from Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) on elderly DLBCL. We analyzed the presentations and survival outcomes of patients with DLBCL according to their socioeconomic status.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>This was a multicenter retrospective study conducted from 2015 to 2023. We included 176 patients aged 60 years or older. The variables examined were age, gender, subtype, resource environment and treatment received. Kaplan-Meier curve was created for the entire patient cohort; t-test was utilized to compare means, Disease-Free Survival (DFS) and Overall Survival (OS), with a significance level of p &lt; 0.05. Analysis was performed using SPSS version 29.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The median age was 66 years (range: 60–89 years). Ninety-three (57%) patients were treated in limited resource settings, while 43% had enhanced resources. ECOG performance scores between 2 and 3 were present in 71%. Median IPI score was 3. RCHOP regimen was administered to 51% (n = 81) patients, and CHOP regimen to 20% (n = 32) patients. In 21% (n = 38) salvage treatment was given due to relapsed/refractory disease. None of the patients in this group received consolidation with autologous stem cell transplant. The entire cohort’s OS was 12-months, while DFS was 8-months. OS (33.9% vs. 8.2%; p = 0.00) and DFS (29% vs. 5.9%; p = 0.00) were better in patients with enhanced resources. The median DFS of patients treated in enhanced settings was 1.3-years versus 0.4-years in limited resource settings (p &lt; 0.0001)</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Survival rates were lower for patients receiving treatment in resource-limited settings. Outcomes can be improved with early referral and inclusion of Rituximab. Enhanced geriatric assessments along with better supportive care is essential.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12958,"journal":{"name":"Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 103893"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2531137925001610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Treating Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) in elderly patients is challenging. There is limited data available from Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) on elderly DLBCL. We analyzed the presentations and survival outcomes of patients with DLBCL according to their socioeconomic status.

Methodology

This was a multicenter retrospective study conducted from 2015 to 2023. We included 176 patients aged 60 years or older. The variables examined were age, gender, subtype, resource environment and treatment received. Kaplan-Meier curve was created for the entire patient cohort; t-test was utilized to compare means, Disease-Free Survival (DFS) and Overall Survival (OS), with a significance level of p < 0.05. Analysis was performed using SPSS version 29.

Results

The median age was 66 years (range: 60–89 years). Ninety-three (57%) patients were treated in limited resource settings, while 43% had enhanced resources. ECOG performance scores between 2 and 3 were present in 71%. Median IPI score was 3. RCHOP regimen was administered to 51% (n = 81) patients, and CHOP regimen to 20% (n = 32) patients. In 21% (n = 38) salvage treatment was given due to relapsed/refractory disease. None of the patients in this group received consolidation with autologous stem cell transplant. The entire cohort’s OS was 12-months, while DFS was 8-months. OS (33.9% vs. 8.2%; p = 0.00) and DFS (29% vs. 5.9%; p = 0.00) were better in patients with enhanced resources. The median DFS of patients treated in enhanced settings was 1.3-years versus 0.4-years in limited resource settings (p < 0.0001)

Conclusion

Survival rates were lower for patients receiving treatment in resource-limited settings. Outcomes can be improved with early referral and inclusion of Rituximab. Enhanced geriatric assessments along with better supportive care is essential.
老年人弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤在资源有限的环境中治疗的结果
目的老年弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)的治疗具有挑战性。低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)关于老年DLBCL的数据有限。我们根据患者的社会经济地位分析了DLBCL患者的表现和生存结果。方法:本研究为2015 - 2023年的多中心回顾性研究。我们纳入了176名年龄在60岁或以上的患者。检查的变量包括年龄、性别、亚型、资源环境和接受的治疗。为整个患者队列创建Kaplan-Meier曲线;采用t检验比较均值、无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS),显著性水平为p <;0.05. 采用SPSS 29版进行分析。结果患者中位年龄66岁(范围60 ~ 89岁)。93名(57%)患者在资源有限的环境中接受治疗,而43%的患者在资源增强的环境中接受治疗。ECOG表现得分在2 - 3分之间的占71%。IPI得分中位数为3。51% (n = 81)患者采用RCHOP方案,20% (n = 32)患者采用CHOP方案。21% (n = 38)因复发/难治性疾病而给予挽救性治疗。本组患者均未接受自体干细胞移植巩固治疗。整个队列的OS为12个月,DFS为8个月。OS (33.9% vs. 8.2%;p = 0.00)和DFS (29% vs. 5.9%;P = 0.00)。在强化环境中治疗的患者的中位生存期为1.3年,而在资源有限的环境中为0.4年(p <;0.0001)结论在资源有限的环境中接受治疗的患者生存率较低。早期转诊和纳入利妥昔单抗可改善预后。加强老年评估以及更好的支持性护理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1419
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信