Culture is not ecology

IF 3.2 1区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Kaleda K. Denton , Elisa Heinrich-Mora , Noah Egan , Marcus W. Feldman
{"title":"Culture is not ecology","authors":"Kaleda K. Denton ,&nbsp;Elisa Heinrich-Mora ,&nbsp;Noah Egan ,&nbsp;Marcus W. Feldman","doi":"10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2025.106717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In “The Ecological Approach to Culture”, <span><span>Baumard and André (2025)</span></span> argue that culture is not fundamentally different from ecology, and that “adaptationist thinking and inclusive fitness theory [are] just as central to understanding cultural phenomena as [they are] to explaining any animal behavior—and, more broadly, any biological process” (p. 15). These statements are empirically and theoretically incorrect. Here, we outline why culture is different from ecology, why adaptationist thinking is misguided, and why inclusive fitness theory is of very limited applicability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55159,"journal":{"name":"Evolution and Human Behavior","volume":"46 5","pages":"Article 106717"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolution and Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513825000662","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In “The Ecological Approach to Culture”, Baumard and André (2025) argue that culture is not fundamentally different from ecology, and that “adaptationist thinking and inclusive fitness theory [are] just as central to understanding cultural phenomena as [they are] to explaining any animal behavior—and, more broadly, any biological process” (p. 15). These statements are empirically and theoretically incorrect. Here, we outline why culture is different from ecology, why adaptationist thinking is misguided, and why inclusive fitness theory is of very limited applicability.
文化不是生态
在《文化的生态方法》一书中,Baumard和andr(2025)认为文化与生态并没有本质上的不同,“适应主义思维和包容性适应理论对于理解文化现象和解释任何动物行为,更广泛地说,对于解释任何生物过程一样重要”(第15页)。这些说法在经验和理论上都是不正确的。在这里,我们概述了为什么文化不同于生态,为什么适应主义思想是错误的,以及为什么包容性适应性理论的适用性非常有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Evolution and Human Behavior
Evolution and Human Behavior 生物-行为科学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
62
审稿时长
82 days
期刊介绍: Evolution and Human Behavior is an interdisciplinary journal, presenting research reports and theory in which evolutionary perspectives are brought to bear on the study of human behavior. It is primarily a scientific journal, but submissions from scholars in the humanities are also encouraged. Papers reporting on theoretical and empirical work on other species will be welcome if their relevance to the human animal is apparent.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信