Use of PROMIS Global-10 to measure changes in health-related quality of life among contraceptive initiators; a feasibility study.

Emily S Barker, Rachel Paul, Megan Dorsey, Jennifer A Reeves, Tessa Madden
{"title":"Use of PROMIS Global-10 to measure changes in health-related quality of life among contraceptive initiators; a feasibility study.","authors":"Emily S Barker, Rachel Paul, Megan Dorsey, Jennifer A Reeves, Tessa Madden","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2025.111004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the feasibility of recruiting initiators of combined oral contraceptives (COC) or the levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) and using PROMIS Global-10 to compare the change in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) between baseline and six months.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We recruited patients aged 18-45 years initiating COC or LNG-IUD at a single academic medical center. We also enrolled patients using a coitally dependent or no contraceptive method (hormonal contraception [HC] non-users) for comparison. Participants completed PROMIS Global-10 at baseline and six months. PROMIS Global-10 measures physical and mental health quality of life with higher scores indicating better health. We calculated the change in t-scores from baseline to six months using appropriate non-parametric tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 150 participants (50 per group) over a 12-month period. Of these, 39 (78%) COC, 44 (88%) LNG-IUD, and 43 (86%) HC non-users completed six months of follow-up. We did not observe a significant change in t-scores in paired-sample analyses (physical: median 0.0, IQR: -3.1, 3.8, p=0.35; mental: median 0.1, IQR: -4.3, 4.7, p=0.78) between baseline and 6 months for COC or LNG-IUD users. T-scores were similar between the three groups at baseline (physical: p=0.32; mental: p=0.20) and six months (physical: p=0.20; mental: p=0.12).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our setting, recruitment of COC or LNG-IUD initiators was slower than anticipated. We did not observe a difference in physical and mental HRQOL among patients initiating COC and LNG-IUD at six months compared to baseline, nor compared to patients not initiating hormonal contraception, using the PROMIS Global-10.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Using PROMIS Global-10 to measure HRQOL, we did not observe significant changes in health-related quality of life in the six months after starting LNG-IUDs or COC compared to baseline and to people not using hormonal contraception.</p>","PeriodicalId":93955,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":" ","pages":"111004"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2025.111004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the feasibility of recruiting initiators of combined oral contraceptives (COC) or the levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) and using PROMIS Global-10 to compare the change in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) between baseline and six months.

Study design: We recruited patients aged 18-45 years initiating COC or LNG-IUD at a single academic medical center. We also enrolled patients using a coitally dependent or no contraceptive method (hormonal contraception [HC] non-users) for comparison. Participants completed PROMIS Global-10 at baseline and six months. PROMIS Global-10 measures physical and mental health quality of life with higher scores indicating better health. We calculated the change in t-scores from baseline to six months using appropriate non-parametric tests.

Results: We enrolled 150 participants (50 per group) over a 12-month period. Of these, 39 (78%) COC, 44 (88%) LNG-IUD, and 43 (86%) HC non-users completed six months of follow-up. We did not observe a significant change in t-scores in paired-sample analyses (physical: median 0.0, IQR: -3.1, 3.8, p=0.35; mental: median 0.1, IQR: -4.3, 4.7, p=0.78) between baseline and 6 months for COC or LNG-IUD users. T-scores were similar between the three groups at baseline (physical: p=0.32; mental: p=0.20) and six months (physical: p=0.20; mental: p=0.12).

Conclusion: In our setting, recruitment of COC or LNG-IUD initiators was slower than anticipated. We did not observe a difference in physical and mental HRQOL among patients initiating COC and LNG-IUD at six months compared to baseline, nor compared to patients not initiating hormonal contraception, using the PROMIS Global-10.

Implications: Using PROMIS Global-10 to measure HRQOL, we did not observe significant changes in health-related quality of life in the six months after starting LNG-IUDs or COC compared to baseline and to people not using hormonal contraception.

使用PROMIS Global-10来衡量避孕发起者健康相关生活质量的变化;可行性研究。
目的:评估招募联合口服避孕药(COC)或左炔诺孕酮宫内节育器(LNG-IUD)启动者的可行性,并使用PROMIS Global-10比较基线和6个月期间健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)的变化。研究设计:我们在一个学术医疗中心招募年龄在18-45岁的患者开始COC或LNG-IUD。我们还招募了使用性交依赖或不使用避孕方法(激素避孕[HC]非使用者)的患者进行比较。参与者在基线和六个月时完成了PROMIS Global-10。PROMIS Global-10衡量身体和心理健康生活质量,得分越高表明健康状况越好。我们使用适当的非参数检验计算了t评分从基线到六个月的变化。结果:我们在12个月的时间里招募了150名参与者(每组50人)。其中,39例COC(78%)、44例LNG-IUD(88%)和43例HC非使用者完成了6个月的随访。配对样本分析中,我们未观察到t得分的显著变化(物理:中位数0.0,IQR: -3.1, 3.8, p=0.35;COC或LNG-IUD使用者在基线和6个月间的心理:中位数0.1,IQR: -4.3, 4.7, p=0.78)。三组在基线时的t评分相似(物理:p=0.32;心理:p=0.20)和6个月(生理:p=0.20;精神:p = 0.12)。结论:在我们的研究中,COC或LNG-IUD启动器的招募比预期的要慢。使用PROMIS Global-10,我们没有观察到在6个月时开始COC和LNG-IUD的患者与基线相比的生理和精神HRQOL差异,也没有观察到与未开始激素避孕的患者相比的差异。含义:使用PROMIS Global-10测量HRQOL,我们没有观察到与基线和未使用激素避孕的人相比,在开始使用lng - iud或COC后6个月内与健康相关的生活质量发生显著变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信