Benefits of colorectal cancer screening using FIT with varying positivity thresholds by age and sex.

IF 9.9 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Matthias Harlass, Amy B Knudsen, Daan Nieboer, Luuk A van Duuren, Karen M Kuntz, Carolyn M Rutter, Pedro Nascimento de Lima, Nicholson Collier, Jonathan Ozik, Anne I Hahn, Fernando Alarid-Escudero, Ann G Zauber, John M Inadomi, Reinier G S Meester, Iris Lansdorp Vogelaar
{"title":"Benefits of colorectal cancer screening using FIT with varying positivity thresholds by age and sex.","authors":"Matthias Harlass, Amy B Knudsen, Daan Nieboer, Luuk A van Duuren, Karen M Kuntz, Carolyn M Rutter, Pedro Nascimento de Lima, Nicholson Collier, Jonathan Ozik, Anne I Hahn, Fernando Alarid-Escudero, Ann G Zauber, John M Inadomi, Reinier G S Meester, Iris Lansdorp Vogelaar","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djaf149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fecal immunochemical test (FIT) performance for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening varies by age and sex, yet most FIT-based screening programs use uniform thresholds. This study assessed the potential benefits of stratifying FIT thresholds based on age and sex.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a meta-analysis of FIT sensitivity and specificity at various positivity thresholds by age and sex. We then used these estimates in two microsimulation models of CRC and projected lifetime clinical outcomes, incremental costs, and quality-adjusted life-years gained (QALYG) from age- and sex-stratified FIT strategies. FIT thresholds ranged from 10 to 50 µg hemoglobin/g feces (µg/g).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For current uniform FIT screening (20 µg/g), models projected 85.67 to 122.15 QALYG at incremental costs of -$982 to $504 per 1,000 individuals compared to no screening. At equivalent costs to current uniform screening, only one model found stratified FIT approaches cost-effective, yielding a marginal increase of 1.04 and 1.10 QALYG/1,000 females and males, respectively. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALYG, both models found stratified FIT cut-offs to be the best strategy, with cut-offs being equal or higher for men and lowest at older ages. Uniform strategies showed comparable effectiveness, falling within one quality-adjusted life day per person of efficient strategies at up to $112 more per person. Results were sensitive to FIT test performance characteristics and one-time setup costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stratifying FIT thresholds by age and sex may be cost-effective compared to current screening. However, the gain in expected health benefits with stratified FIT screening is likely small.</p>","PeriodicalId":14809,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaf149","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fecal immunochemical test (FIT) performance for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening varies by age and sex, yet most FIT-based screening programs use uniform thresholds. This study assessed the potential benefits of stratifying FIT thresholds based on age and sex.

Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis of FIT sensitivity and specificity at various positivity thresholds by age and sex. We then used these estimates in two microsimulation models of CRC and projected lifetime clinical outcomes, incremental costs, and quality-adjusted life-years gained (QALYG) from age- and sex-stratified FIT strategies. FIT thresholds ranged from 10 to 50 µg hemoglobin/g feces (µg/g).

Results: For current uniform FIT screening (20 µg/g), models projected 85.67 to 122.15 QALYG at incremental costs of -$982 to $504 per 1,000 individuals compared to no screening. At equivalent costs to current uniform screening, only one model found stratified FIT approaches cost-effective, yielding a marginal increase of 1.04 and 1.10 QALYG/1,000 females and males, respectively. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALYG, both models found stratified FIT cut-offs to be the best strategy, with cut-offs being equal or higher for men and lowest at older ages. Uniform strategies showed comparable effectiveness, falling within one quality-adjusted life day per person of efficient strategies at up to $112 more per person. Results were sensitive to FIT test performance characteristics and one-time setup costs.

Conclusion: Stratifying FIT thresholds by age and sex may be cost-effective compared to current screening. However, the gain in expected health benefits with stratified FIT screening is likely small.

年龄和性别不同的FIT阳性阈值对结直肠癌筛查的益处
背景:粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)在结直肠癌(CRC)筛查中的表现因年龄和性别而异,但大多数基于FIT的筛查项目使用统一的阈值。本研究评估了基于年龄和性别分层FIT阈值的潜在益处。方法:我们按年龄和性别对不同阳性阈值的FIT敏感性和特异性进行了荟萃分析。然后,我们将这些估计值应用于CRC的两个微观模拟模型中,并通过年龄和性别分层FIT策略预测终生临床结果、增量成本和质量调整生命年(QALYG)。FIT阈值范围为10 ~ 50µg血红蛋白/g粪便(µg/g)。结果:对于目前的统一FIT筛选(20 μ g/g),模型预测85.67至122.15 QALYG,与未筛选相比,每1000人的增量成本为- 982至504美元。在与当前统一筛选同等的成本下,只有一个模型发现分层FIT方法具有成本效益,分别产生1.04和1.10 QALYG/ 1000女性和男性的边际增加。在支付意愿阈值为10万美元/QALYG的情况下,两个模型都发现分层FIT临界值是最佳策略,男性的临界值相等或更高,老年人的临界值最低。统一策略显示出相当的效果,与有效策略相比,统一策略的人均质量调整生活日最多可多出112美元。结果对FIT测试性能特征和一次性设置成本敏感。结论:与目前的筛查相比,按年龄和性别分层FIT阈值可能具有成本效益。然而,分层FIT筛查的预期健康益处的增加可能很小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
203
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the National Cancer Institute is a reputable publication that undergoes a peer-review process. It is available in both print (ISSN: 0027-8874) and online (ISSN: 1460-2105) formats, with 12 issues released annually. The journal's primary aim is to disseminate innovative and important discoveries in the field of cancer research, with specific emphasis on clinical, epidemiologic, behavioral, and health outcomes studies. Authors are encouraged to submit reviews, minireviews, and commentaries. The journal ensures that submitted manuscripts undergo a rigorous and expedited review to publish scientifically and medically significant findings in a timely manner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信