Malte D. Luecken, Scott Gigante, Daniel B. Burkhardt, Robrecht Cannoodt, Daniel C. Strobl, Nikolay S. Markov, Luke Zappia, Giovanni Palla, Wesley Lewis, Daniel Dimitrov, Michael E. Vinyard, D. S. Magruder, Michaela F. Mueller, Alma Andersson, Emma Dann, Qian Qin, Dominik J. Otto, Michal Klein, Olga Borisovna Botvinnik, Louise Deconinck, Kai Waldrant, Sai Nirmayi Yasa, Artur Szałata, Andrew Benz, Zhijian Li, Jonathan M. Bloom, Angela Oliveira Pisco, Julio Saez-Rodriguez, Drausin Wulsin, Luca Pinello, Yvan Saeys, Fabian J. Theis, Smita Krishnaswamy
{"title":"Defining and benchmarking open problems in single-cell analysis","authors":"Malte D. Luecken, Scott Gigante, Daniel B. Burkhardt, Robrecht Cannoodt, Daniel C. Strobl, Nikolay S. Markov, Luke Zappia, Giovanni Palla, Wesley Lewis, Daniel Dimitrov, Michael E. Vinyard, D. S. Magruder, Michaela F. Mueller, Alma Andersson, Emma Dann, Qian Qin, Dominik J. Otto, Michal Klein, Olga Borisovna Botvinnik, Louise Deconinck, Kai Waldrant, Sai Nirmayi Yasa, Artur Szałata, Andrew Benz, Zhijian Li, Jonathan M. Bloom, Angela Oliveira Pisco, Julio Saez-Rodriguez, Drausin Wulsin, Luca Pinello, Yvan Saeys, Fabian J. Theis, Smita Krishnaswamy","doi":"10.1038/s41587-025-02694-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Single-cell genomics has enabled the study of biological processes at an unprecedented scale and resolution. These studies were enabled by innovative data generation technologies coupled with emerging computational tools specialized for single-cell data. As single-cell technologies have become more prevalent, so has the development of new analysis tools, which has resulted in over 1,700 published algorithms<sup>1</sup> (as of February 2024). Thus, there is an increasing need to continually evaluate which algorithm performs best in which context to inform best practices<sup>2,3</sup> that evolve with the field.</p><p>In many fields of quantitative science, public competitions and benchmarks address this need by evaluating state-of-the-art methods against known criteria, following the concept of a common task framework<sup>4</sup>. Here, we present Open Problems, a living, extensive, community-guided platform including 12 current single-cell tasks that we envisage raising standards for the selection, evaluation and development of methods in single-cell analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":19084,"journal":{"name":"Nature biotechnology","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":33.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-025-02694-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Single-cell genomics has enabled the study of biological processes at an unprecedented scale and resolution. These studies were enabled by innovative data generation technologies coupled with emerging computational tools specialized for single-cell data. As single-cell technologies have become more prevalent, so has the development of new analysis tools, which has resulted in over 1,700 published algorithms1 (as of February 2024). Thus, there is an increasing need to continually evaluate which algorithm performs best in which context to inform best practices2,3 that evolve with the field.
In many fields of quantitative science, public competitions and benchmarks address this need by evaluating state-of-the-art methods against known criteria, following the concept of a common task framework4. Here, we present Open Problems, a living, extensive, community-guided platform including 12 current single-cell tasks that we envisage raising standards for the selection, evaluation and development of methods in single-cell analysis.
期刊介绍:
Nature Biotechnology is a monthly journal that focuses on the science and business of biotechnology. It covers a wide range of topics including technology/methodology advancements in the biological, biomedical, agricultural, and environmental sciences. The journal also explores the commercial, political, ethical, legal, and societal aspects of this research.
The journal serves researchers by providing peer-reviewed research papers in the field of biotechnology. It also serves the business community by delivering news about research developments. This approach ensures that both the scientific and business communities are well-informed and able to stay up-to-date on the latest advancements and opportunities in the field.
Some key areas of interest in which the journal actively seeks research papers include molecular engineering of nucleic acids and proteins, molecular therapy, large-scale biology, computational biology, regenerative medicine, imaging technology, analytical biotechnology, applied immunology, food and agricultural biotechnology, and environmental biotechnology.
In summary, Nature Biotechnology is a comprehensive journal that covers both the scientific and business aspects of biotechnology. It strives to provide researchers with valuable research papers and news while also delivering important scientific advancements to the business community.