Magnetic resonance imaging features of mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma of the uterine corpus in comparison with endometrial endometrioid carcinoma: Multi-institutional study
IF 3.2 3区 医学Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
{"title":"Magnetic resonance imaging features of mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma of the uterine corpus in comparison with endometrial endometrioid carcinoma: Multi-institutional study","authors":"Saki Yamamoto , Mitsuru Matsuki , Sota Masuoka , Tomohiro Kikuchi , Hiroyuki Fujii , Atsushi Kihara , Naoki Sano , Noriyoshi Fukushima , Hiroyuki Fujiwara , Hiroki Kato , Yuki Himoto , Hideyuki Fukui , Takahiro Tsuboyama , Yoshiko Ueno , Shinya Fujii , Kaori Yamada , Harushi Mori","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To examine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma (MLA) of the uterine corpus.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>MRI features of 19 patients with pathologically proven MLA of the uterine corpus were retrospectively compared with those of 95 patients with endometrial endometrioid carcinoma (EEC).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most patients with MLA were postmenopausal. Advanced FIGO stages were more common in the MLA than in the EEC group (63.2 % vs. 18.9 %, <em>p</em> < 0.001). On MRI, endophytic growth into the myometrium were more frequent in the MLA than in the EEC group (68.4 % vs. 14.7 %, <em>p</em> = 0.005). The median maximum tumor diameter in the MLA group (52.4 mm) tended to be larger than that in the EEC group (38.9 mm), although the difference was not statistically significant (<em>p</em> = 0.374). The tumor-to-muscle signal intensity ratio (SIR) on fat-suppressed gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted gradient-echo imaging was higher in the MLA group than in the EEC group. (1.67 vs. 1.36, <em>p</em> = 0.002). The SIR on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) was comparable between the two groups (8.35 vs. 6.72, <em>p</em> = 0.330). The apparent diffusion coefficient value was lower in the MLA than in the EEC group (0.69 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s vs. 0.76 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s, <em>p</em> = 0.003). Coexisting adenomyosis was more frequent in the MLA than in the EEC group (52.6 % vs. 21.1 %, <em>p</em> = 0.034). The concordance rate between MRI and pathology for adenomyosis coexistence was 84.2 % for MLA, 87.4 % for EEC, and 86.8 % overall. MLA of the uterine corpus was identified in two patients, characterized by development independent of and discontinuous from the endometrium, whereas EEC in all patients demonstrated continuity with the endometrium.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>MRI of MLA of the uterine corpus typically demonstrates large, diffuse, and endophytic growth into the myometrium, with strong contrast enhancement and more restricted diffusion compared to EEC, with coexisting adenomyosis present in over 50% of patients. Therefore, postmenopausal women with adenomyosis should be carefully evaluated for MLA on MRI, particularly using DWI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 112260"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25003468","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
To examine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma (MLA) of the uterine corpus.
Method
MRI features of 19 patients with pathologically proven MLA of the uterine corpus were retrospectively compared with those of 95 patients with endometrial endometrioid carcinoma (EEC).
Results
Most patients with MLA were postmenopausal. Advanced FIGO stages were more common in the MLA than in the EEC group (63.2 % vs. 18.9 %, p < 0.001). On MRI, endophytic growth into the myometrium were more frequent in the MLA than in the EEC group (68.4 % vs. 14.7 %, p = 0.005). The median maximum tumor diameter in the MLA group (52.4 mm) tended to be larger than that in the EEC group (38.9 mm), although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.374). The tumor-to-muscle signal intensity ratio (SIR) on fat-suppressed gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted gradient-echo imaging was higher in the MLA group than in the EEC group. (1.67 vs. 1.36, p = 0.002). The SIR on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) was comparable between the two groups (8.35 vs. 6.72, p = 0.330). The apparent diffusion coefficient value was lower in the MLA than in the EEC group (0.69 10-3 mm2/s vs. 0.76 × 10-3 mm2/s, p = 0.003). Coexisting adenomyosis was more frequent in the MLA than in the EEC group (52.6 % vs. 21.1 %, p = 0.034). The concordance rate between MRI and pathology for adenomyosis coexistence was 84.2 % for MLA, 87.4 % for EEC, and 86.8 % overall. MLA of the uterine corpus was identified in two patients, characterized by development independent of and discontinuous from the endometrium, whereas EEC in all patients demonstrated continuity with the endometrium.
Conclusions
MRI of MLA of the uterine corpus typically demonstrates large, diffuse, and endophytic growth into the myometrium, with strong contrast enhancement and more restricted diffusion compared to EEC, with coexisting adenomyosis present in over 50% of patients. Therefore, postmenopausal women with adenomyosis should be carefully evaluated for MLA on MRI, particularly using DWI.
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field.
Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.