Unmet Needs in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Overcoming Recalcitrant Clots.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cardiology in Review Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-27 DOI:10.1097/CRD.0000000000000977
Mahmood Mirza, Christian Ulfert, Ray McCarthy, Patrick Brouwer
{"title":"Unmet Needs in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Overcoming Recalcitrant Clots.","authors":"Mahmood Mirza, Christian Ulfert, Ray McCarthy, Patrick Brouwer","doi":"10.1097/CRD.0000000000000977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endovascular thrombectomy has revolutionized acute ischemic stroke treatment, significantly improving recanalization rates. However, up to 20% of cases involve recalcitrant clots that fail to recanalize or require multiple passes, negatively impacting clinical outcomes. This review explores the multifaceted nature of these challenging clots, including insights from preclinical, imaging, and clinical studies, with strategies to overcome them. Ex-vivo clot characterization reveals red blood cell-poorness in clots as a common feature in fibrin-rich, platelet-rich, neutrophil extracellular traps-rich, collagenous or bacteria-rich clots. Preclinical models have evolved alongside ex-vivo clot analysis, demonstrating properties such as increased stiffness, toughness, hardness, and stickiness that hinders retrieval. Imaging markers such as absence of the hyperdense artery sign or susceptibility vessel sign correlate with recalcitrant clots, although reliable predictors of recalcitrant clots remain elusive. Recent innovations, including specifically designed tough clot stent-retrievers such as Nimbus and technologies to improve complete clot ingestion such as super-bore aspiration catheters and cyclic aspiration have shown promise. Yet, a substantial proportion of cases still have difficulty or fail to achieve recanalization. Techniques such as rescue stenting and dual-stent-retriever approaches offer additional strategies but carry risks of vascular injury and complications. Major research limitations include clot deformation during retrieval and the inability to remove some clots. Furthermore, some interactions are poorly understood, such as the biological interaction between the clot and vessel wall or with circulating thrombo-influencing proteins. Overcoming these challenges can pave the pathway for creative solutions to elegantly improve the recanalization of tough clots.</p>","PeriodicalId":9549,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology in Review","volume":" ","pages":"472-482"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12498969/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology in Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CRD.0000000000000977","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Endovascular thrombectomy has revolutionized acute ischemic stroke treatment, significantly improving recanalization rates. However, up to 20% of cases involve recalcitrant clots that fail to recanalize or require multiple passes, negatively impacting clinical outcomes. This review explores the multifaceted nature of these challenging clots, including insights from preclinical, imaging, and clinical studies, with strategies to overcome them. Ex-vivo clot characterization reveals red blood cell-poorness in clots as a common feature in fibrin-rich, platelet-rich, neutrophil extracellular traps-rich, collagenous or bacteria-rich clots. Preclinical models have evolved alongside ex-vivo clot analysis, demonstrating properties such as increased stiffness, toughness, hardness, and stickiness that hinders retrieval. Imaging markers such as absence of the hyperdense artery sign or susceptibility vessel sign correlate with recalcitrant clots, although reliable predictors of recalcitrant clots remain elusive. Recent innovations, including specifically designed tough clot stent-retrievers such as Nimbus and technologies to improve complete clot ingestion such as super-bore aspiration catheters and cyclic aspiration have shown promise. Yet, a substantial proportion of cases still have difficulty or fail to achieve recanalization. Techniques such as rescue stenting and dual-stent-retriever approaches offer additional strategies but carry risks of vascular injury and complications. Major research limitations include clot deformation during retrieval and the inability to remove some clots. Furthermore, some interactions are poorly understood, such as the biological interaction between the clot and vessel wall or with circulating thrombo-influencing proteins. Overcoming these challenges can pave the pathway for creative solutions to elegantly improve the recanalization of tough clots.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

急性缺血性卒中未满足的需求:克服顽固性凝块。
血管内血栓切除术彻底改变了急性缺血性卒中的治疗,显著提高了再通率。然而,高达20%的病例涉及顽固性血块,无法再通或需要多次通过,对临床结果产生负面影响。这篇综述探讨了这些具有挑战性的血块的多面性,包括临床前、影像学和临床研究的见解,以及克服它们的策略。离体血块特征揭示了血块中红细胞缺乏是富纤维蛋白、富血小板、富中性粒细胞胞外捕集物、胶原或富细菌血块的共同特征。临床前模型随着离体血块分析的发展而发展,显示出诸如增加的刚度、韧性、硬度和粘性等特性,这些特性阻碍了提取。成像标记,如没有高密度动脉征象或易感性血管征象与顽固性血栓相关,尽管顽固性血栓的可靠预测仍然难以捉摸。最近的创新,包括专门设计的硬物血栓支架回收器,如Nimbus,以及改善血栓完全吸收的技术,如超孔抽吸导管和循环抽吸,都显示出了希望。然而,相当比例的病例仍有困难或未能实现再通。抢救支架置入术和双支架置入术等技术提供了额外的策略,但存在血管损伤和并发症的风险。主要的研究局限包括取血过程中的血块变形和一些血块无法移除。此外,一些相互作用尚不清楚,如凝块与血管壁或与循环血栓影响蛋白之间的生物相互作用。克服这些挑战可以为创造性的解决方案铺平道路,以优雅地改善坚硬血栓的再通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiology in Review
Cardiology in Review CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Cardiology in Review is to publish reviews on topics of current interest in cardiology that will foster increased understanding of the pathogenesis, diagnosis, clinical course, prevention, and treatment of cardiovascular disorders. Articles of the highest quality are written by authorities in the field and published promptly in a readable format with visual appeal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信