Utkarsh Gangwal , Rithika Dulam , Shangjia Dong , Rachel A. Davidson , James Kendra , Bradley Ewing , Adam Andresen
{"title":"Lights out, decisions on: How households adapt to power outages across regions and events","authors":"Utkarsh Gangwal , Rithika Dulam , Shangjia Dong , Rachel A. Davidson , James Kendra , Bradley Ewing , Adam Andresen","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The capacity to adapt to disturbances is a distinguishing feature of a resilient system. A number of recent power outages have forced households to adapt to service disruptions. Households adapt to power outages in various ways, yet most existing research focuses on a single event in a specific location. This study expands the scope by analyzing four datasets to examine household adaptations across different events and locations: general outages in Los Angeles, California (CA); the 2022 North American winter storm in North Carolina (NC) and New York (NY); the 2021 Texas (TX) winter storm; and hypothetical future events in the first three locations. Using mixed logit models that integrate revealed preference (RP) and stated preference (SP) data, the study investigates household adaptation behavior across regions and events. The analysis addresses three key questions: (1) How common are different adaptations? (2) Which household adaptations tend to occur together, and which do not? (3) How do adaptations vary with household characteristics, outage duration, and geographic location? Results show that, as outage duration increases, people are more likely to consider multiple relocation adaptations and/or use a generator. Some household characteristics affect adaptation differently depending on location. For example, more prepared individuals are more likely to go to hotels in NC but less likely in CA. This study leverages mixed logit models in a novel way to estimate adaptation behavior during power outages. The models can estimate the percentage of people implementing adaptations with sufficient accuracy for practical purposes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 104162"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625002439","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The capacity to adapt to disturbances is a distinguishing feature of a resilient system. A number of recent power outages have forced households to adapt to service disruptions. Households adapt to power outages in various ways, yet most existing research focuses on a single event in a specific location. This study expands the scope by analyzing four datasets to examine household adaptations across different events and locations: general outages in Los Angeles, California (CA); the 2022 North American winter storm in North Carolina (NC) and New York (NY); the 2021 Texas (TX) winter storm; and hypothetical future events in the first three locations. Using mixed logit models that integrate revealed preference (RP) and stated preference (SP) data, the study investigates household adaptation behavior across regions and events. The analysis addresses three key questions: (1) How common are different adaptations? (2) Which household adaptations tend to occur together, and which do not? (3) How do adaptations vary with household characteristics, outage duration, and geographic location? Results show that, as outage duration increases, people are more likely to consider multiple relocation adaptations and/or use a generator. Some household characteristics affect adaptation differently depending on location. For example, more prepared individuals are more likely to go to hotels in NC but less likely in CA. This study leverages mixed logit models in a novel way to estimate adaptation behavior during power outages. The models can estimate the percentage of people implementing adaptations with sufficient accuracy for practical purposes.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.