Addressing Pediatric Asthma Disparities through RI-AIR's Community Approach: A Randomized Trial.

Elizabeth L McQuaid, David Barker, Elizabeth S Chen, Maria T Coutinho, Grace K Cushman, Linnea Drew, A Rani Elwy, Cynthia A Esteban, Barbara N Jandasek, Sheryl J Kopel, Deborah Pearlman, Ronald Seifer, Patrick Vivier, Daphne Koinis-Mitchell
{"title":"Addressing Pediatric Asthma Disparities through RI-AIR's Community Approach: A Randomized Trial.","authors":"Elizabeth L McQuaid, David Barker, Elizabeth S Chen, Maria T Coutinho, Grace K Cushman, Linnea Drew, A Rani Elwy, Cynthia A Esteban, Barbara N Jandasek, Sheryl J Kopel, Deborah Pearlman, Ronald Seifer, Patrick Vivier, Daphne Koinis-Mitchell","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202501-016OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Clustering of social and environmental risks in low-income neighborhoods is a key factor in racial and ethnic asthma disparities. Integrating school and in-home programs, with treatment tailored to disease risk, is a promising approach for children with high disease burden.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We evaluated the Rhode Island-Asthma Integrated Response (RI-AIR) Program in improving asthma outcomes at the individual and community levels. RI-AIR leverages existing community collaborations and technological advances to identify children with asthma at highest risk for poor outcomes through a system of identification, screening, and intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a stepped wedge cluster randomized hybrid type-II effectiveness-implementation study. School-based catchment areas (n=32) of high asthma burden were identified using geospatial mapping of asthma-related urgent healthcare use from 2010-2018. Families received only school-based interventions if the child's asthma was Not Well Controlled or school and home-based interventions if the child's asthma was Poorly Controlled. Community Health Workers facilitated communication between families, schools, and healthcare providers. Follow-ups occurred every 3 months to 1-year post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individual level: At 3-months, asthma control (primary outcome) improved (d=0.47 [95% confidence interval = 0.33; 0.61]) and symptom-free days increased (d=0.37 [0.24; 0.51]); both were sustained at 12 months. Community level: Healthcare utilization remained the same or increased (RR = 1.16 [1.00; 1.36]); however, sensitivity analyses indicated utilization was slightly lower in areas with greater family participation (penetration; active=0.93 [0.87; 0.99]; post=0.91 [0.86; 0.97]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intensive, multi-component interventions and community engagement are needed to improve asthma outcomes in areas of high burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":93876,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202501-016OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Clustering of social and environmental risks in low-income neighborhoods is a key factor in racial and ethnic asthma disparities. Integrating school and in-home programs, with treatment tailored to disease risk, is a promising approach for children with high disease burden.

Objectives: We evaluated the Rhode Island-Asthma Integrated Response (RI-AIR) Program in improving asthma outcomes at the individual and community levels. RI-AIR leverages existing community collaborations and technological advances to identify children with asthma at highest risk for poor outcomes through a system of identification, screening, and intervention.

Methods: We conducted a stepped wedge cluster randomized hybrid type-II effectiveness-implementation study. School-based catchment areas (n=32) of high asthma burden were identified using geospatial mapping of asthma-related urgent healthcare use from 2010-2018. Families received only school-based interventions if the child's asthma was Not Well Controlled or school and home-based interventions if the child's asthma was Poorly Controlled. Community Health Workers facilitated communication between families, schools, and healthcare providers. Follow-ups occurred every 3 months to 1-year post-intervention.

Results: Individual level: At 3-months, asthma control (primary outcome) improved (d=0.47 [95% confidence interval = 0.33; 0.61]) and symptom-free days increased (d=0.37 [0.24; 0.51]); both were sustained at 12 months. Community level: Healthcare utilization remained the same or increased (RR = 1.16 [1.00; 1.36]); however, sensitivity analyses indicated utilization was slightly lower in areas with greater family participation (penetration; active=0.93 [0.87; 0.99]; post=0.91 [0.86; 0.97]).

Conclusions: Intensive, multi-component interventions and community engagement are needed to improve asthma outcomes in areas of high burden.

通过RI-AIR的社区方法解决儿童哮喘差异:一项随机试验。
理由:低收入社区的社会和环境风险聚集是种族和民族哮喘差异的关键因素。将学校和家庭项目结合起来,并根据疾病风险进行治疗,对高疾病负担儿童来说是一种很有希望的方法。目的:我们评估罗德岛哮喘综合反应(RI-AIR)项目在改善个体和社区哮喘结局方面的作用。RI-AIR利用现有的社区合作和技术进步,通过识别、筛查和干预系统,识别出预后不良风险最高的哮喘儿童。方法:采用阶梯楔形聚类随机混合ii型有效性实施研究。利用2010-2018年哮喘相关紧急医疗保健使用的地理空间制图,确定了基于学校的哮喘高负担集水区(n=32)。如果孩子的哮喘没有得到很好的控制,家庭只接受以学校为基础的干预;如果孩子的哮喘控制不好,家庭只接受以学校和家庭为基础的干预。社区卫生工作者促进了家庭、学校和卫生保健提供者之间的沟通。干预后每3个月至1年随访一次。结果:个体水平:3个月时,哮喘控制(主要结局)改善(d=0.47[95%可信区间= 0.33;0.61]),无症状天数增加(d=0.37 [0.24;0.51]);两例均维持12个月。社区水平:医疗保健利用率保持不变或增加(RR = 1.16 [1.00;1.36]);然而,敏感性分析表明,在家庭参与程度较高的地区(渗透;积极= 0.93 (0.87;0.99);帖子= 0.91 (0.86;0.97])。结论:需要强化、多成分干预和社区参与来改善高负担地区的哮喘结局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信