Ideal Facial Proportions in Generative Artificial Intelligence: What Does Artificial Intelligence Consider an Attractive Face?

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Sindhura Sridhar, Richmond L Laryea, Harry D Vildibill, Sunthosh K Sivam
{"title":"Ideal Facial Proportions in Generative Artificial Intelligence: What Does Artificial Intelligence Consider an Attractive Face?","authors":"Sindhura Sridhar, Richmond L Laryea, Harry D Vildibill, Sunthosh K Sivam","doi":"10.1089/fpsam.2025.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> To investigate the facial proportions and physical characteristics deemed ideal and attractive by current popular generative artificial intelligence (AI) models. <b>Methods:</b> \"Attractive\" and \"ideal\" face images were generated using five text-to-image models. Facial proportions of the generated images were measured and compared with the neoclassical canons of facial thirds and fifths. Generated facial proportions were compared between AI models and classical facial proportions using analysis of variance and unpaired Student's <i>t</i>-test, respectively. <b>Results:</b> The generated images included 28 (70%) female faces and 29 (75%) Caucasian faces. Mean generated horizontal proportions were 33.7%, 32.0%, and 34.3%. Mean generated vertical proportions were 21.1%, 18.0%, 21.1%, 17.9%, and 21.7%. The middle horizontal segment was significantly smaller in generated \"ideal faces,\" and the lower horizontal segment was larger in generated \"attractive faces\" compared with classical proportions (<i>p</i> < 0.001 and <i>p</i> = 0.01, respectively); the left and right middle vertical segments were significantly smaller in all generated faces compared with classical proportions (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusion:</b> There are significant differences between the definition of attractive and ideal faces in generative AI models and classical facial proportions. These differences may reflect biases present within the models or may reflect changing cultural perceptions of facial attractiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":48487,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2025.0007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To investigate the facial proportions and physical characteristics deemed ideal and attractive by current popular generative artificial intelligence (AI) models. Methods: "Attractive" and "ideal" face images were generated using five text-to-image models. Facial proportions of the generated images were measured and compared with the neoclassical canons of facial thirds and fifths. Generated facial proportions were compared between AI models and classical facial proportions using analysis of variance and unpaired Student's t-test, respectively. Results: The generated images included 28 (70%) female faces and 29 (75%) Caucasian faces. Mean generated horizontal proportions were 33.7%, 32.0%, and 34.3%. Mean generated vertical proportions were 21.1%, 18.0%, 21.1%, 17.9%, and 21.7%. The middle horizontal segment was significantly smaller in generated "ideal faces," and the lower horizontal segment was larger in generated "attractive faces" compared with classical proportions (p < 0.001 and p = 0.01, respectively); the left and right middle vertical segments were significantly smaller in all generated faces compared with classical proportions (p < 0.001). Conclusion: There are significant differences between the definition of attractive and ideal faces in generative AI models and classical facial proportions. These differences may reflect biases present within the models or may reflect changing cultural perceptions of facial attractiveness.

生成式人工智能中的理想面部比例:人工智能如何看待一张有吸引力的脸?
背景:研究当前流行的生成式人工智能(AI)模型认为理想和有吸引力的面部比例和身体特征。方法:使用五种文本-图像模型生成“迷人”和“理想”面部图像。测量生成图像的面部比例,并与新古典的面部三分和五分标准进行比较。人工智能模型生成的面部比例与经典面部比例分别使用方差分析和unpaired Student’st检验进行比较。结果:生成的图像包括28张(70%)女性面孔和29张(75%)白人面孔。平均生成水平比例为33.7%、32.0%和34.3%。平均产生的垂直比例分别为21.1%、18.0%、21.1%、17.9%和21.7%。与经典比例相比,生成的“理想脸”的中间水平段明显较小,生成的“迷人脸”的下水平段明显较大(p < 0.001和p = 0.01);与经典比例相比,在所有生成的面部中,左、右中间垂直段明显更小(p < 0.001)。结论:生成式人工智能模型对吸引力和理想面部的定义与经典面部比例存在显著差异。这些差异可能反映了模型中存在的偏见,也可能反映了对面部吸引力的文化观念的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
30.00%
发文量
159
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信