Trends and Disparities in Liver Transplantation in the United States: A Nationwide Analysis of Demographic, Clinical, and Socioeconomic Factors (2016-2021).

Q1 Medicine
Vignesh Krishnan Nagesh, Vivek Joseph Varughese, Marina Basta, Emelyn Martinez, Shruthi Badam, Lokaesh Subramani Shobana, Abdifitah Mohamed, Alin J, Simcha Weissman, Adam Atoot
{"title":"Trends and Disparities in Liver Transplantation in the United States: A Nationwide Analysis of Demographic, Clinical, and Socioeconomic Factors (2016-2021).","authors":"Vignesh Krishnan Nagesh, Vivek Joseph Varughese, Marina Basta, Emelyn Martinez, Shruthi Badam, Lokaesh Subramani Shobana, Abdifitah Mohamed, Alin J, Simcha Weissman, Adam Atoot","doi":"10.3390/medsci13020066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Liver transplantation has become the standard of care for patients with end-stage liver disease. Despite advances in surgical techniques, immunosuppression, and perioperative care, disparities in access and outcomes persist across demographic and socioeconomic lines.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess trends and disparities in liver transplant admissions in the United States from 2016 to 2021, examining demographic patterns, in-hospital mortality, hospital charges, length of stay, and socioeconomic factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2016 to 2021, we identified liver transplant admissions using ICD-10 PCS codes 0FY00Z1 and 0FY00Z2. Demographic characteristics (age, sex, race, insurance status, and income quartile), clinical outcomes, and resource utilization metrics were analyzed. One-way ANOVA and Hensel's test were used to assess variance and distribution homogeneity, with a significance threshold of <i>p</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 9677 liver transplant admissions were analyzed. The mean recipient age remained stable (51-52 years), with males comprising ~62% of transplants. White patients constituted the largest group of recipients (~66-68%), followed by Hispanic (~14-17%) and Black patients (~7-10%). The proportion of transplants relative to liver failure admissions remained stable across racial groups, indicating no widening racial gap during the study period. In-hospital mortality post-transplant remained low (2.37-3.52%) and did not differ significantly by race (<i>p</i> = 0.23), sex (<i>p</i> = 0.24), or income quartile (<i>p</i> = 0.13). Similarly, Charlson Comorbidity Index > 5 did not predict inpatient mortality (<i>p</i> = 0.154). Hospital charges ranged from $578,000 to $766,000, with an average stay of ~21 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Liver transplantation outcomes, including in-hospital mortality, appear consistent across demographic and socioeconomic groups once patients are admitted for transplant. However, broader disparities in access persist, necessitating further research into pre-transplant barriers and long-term outcomes. These findings support the need for equitable healthcare strategies aimed at optimizing transplant candidacy and survival across all populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":74152,"journal":{"name":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"13 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12195059/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13020066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Liver transplantation has become the standard of care for patients with end-stage liver disease. Despite advances in surgical techniques, immunosuppression, and perioperative care, disparities in access and outcomes persist across demographic and socioeconomic lines.

Objective: To assess trends and disparities in liver transplant admissions in the United States from 2016 to 2021, examining demographic patterns, in-hospital mortality, hospital charges, length of stay, and socioeconomic factors.

Methods: Using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2016 to 2021, we identified liver transplant admissions using ICD-10 PCS codes 0FY00Z1 and 0FY00Z2. Demographic characteristics (age, sex, race, insurance status, and income quartile), clinical outcomes, and resource utilization metrics were analyzed. One-way ANOVA and Hensel's test were used to assess variance and distribution homogeneity, with a significance threshold of p < 0.05.

Results: A total of 9677 liver transplant admissions were analyzed. The mean recipient age remained stable (51-52 years), with males comprising ~62% of transplants. White patients constituted the largest group of recipients (~66-68%), followed by Hispanic (~14-17%) and Black patients (~7-10%). The proportion of transplants relative to liver failure admissions remained stable across racial groups, indicating no widening racial gap during the study period. In-hospital mortality post-transplant remained low (2.37-3.52%) and did not differ significantly by race (p = 0.23), sex (p = 0.24), or income quartile (p = 0.13). Similarly, Charlson Comorbidity Index > 5 did not predict inpatient mortality (p = 0.154). Hospital charges ranged from $578,000 to $766,000, with an average stay of ~21 days.

Conclusions: Liver transplantation outcomes, including in-hospital mortality, appear consistent across demographic and socioeconomic groups once patients are admitted for transplant. However, broader disparities in access persist, necessitating further research into pre-transplant barriers and long-term outcomes. These findings support the need for equitable healthcare strategies aimed at optimizing transplant candidacy and survival across all populations.

美国肝移植的趋势和差异:2016-2021年全国人口统计学、临床和社会经济因素分析
背景:肝移植已成为终末期肝病患者的标准治疗方法。尽管在手术技术、免疫抑制和围手术期护理方面取得了进步,但人口和社会经济方面的可及性和结果差异仍然存在。目的:评估2016年至2021年美国肝移植入院的趋势和差异,研究人口统计学模式、住院死亡率、医院收费、住院时间和社会经济因素。方法:使用2016 - 2021年全国住院患者样本(NIS),使用ICD-10 PCS代码0FY00Z1和0FY00Z2对肝移植住院患者进行鉴定。分析了人口统计学特征(年龄、性别、种族、保险状况和收入四分位数)、临床结果和资源利用指标。方差和分布均匀性采用单因素方差分析和Hensel检验,显著性阈值为p < 0.05。结果:共分析9677例肝移植入院患者。平均受者年龄保持稳定(51-52岁),男性占移植的62%。白人患者是最大的接受者群体(~66-68%),其次是西班牙裔(~14-17%)和黑人患者(~7-10%)。移植相对于肝功能衰竭入院的比例在不同种族之间保持稳定,表明在研究期间没有扩大种族差距。移植后住院死亡率仍然很低(2.37-3.52%),并且在种族(p = 0.23)、性别(p = 0.24)或收入四分位数(p = 0.13)之间没有显著差异。同样,Charlson合并症指数bbb50不能预测住院患者死亡率(p = 0.154)。住院费用从578,000美元到766,000美元不等,平均住院时间约为21天。结论:肝移植的结果,包括住院死亡率,一旦患者接受移植,在人口统计学和社会经济群体中似乎是一致的。然而,在获取方面存在更大的差距,需要进一步研究移植前障碍和长期结果。这些发现支持需要公平的医疗保健策略,旨在优化所有人群的移植候选和生存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信