Trends and Disparities in Liver Transplantation in the United States: A Nationwide Analysis of Demographic, Clinical, and Socioeconomic Factors (2016-2021).
{"title":"Trends and Disparities in Liver Transplantation in the United States: A Nationwide Analysis of Demographic, Clinical, and Socioeconomic Factors (2016-2021).","authors":"Vignesh Krishnan Nagesh, Vivek Joseph Varughese, Marina Basta, Emelyn Martinez, Shruthi Badam, Lokaesh Subramani Shobana, Abdifitah Mohamed, Alin J, Simcha Weissman, Adam Atoot","doi":"10.3390/medsci13020066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Liver transplantation has become the standard of care for patients with end-stage liver disease. Despite advances in surgical techniques, immunosuppression, and perioperative care, disparities in access and outcomes persist across demographic and socioeconomic lines.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess trends and disparities in liver transplant admissions in the United States from 2016 to 2021, examining demographic patterns, in-hospital mortality, hospital charges, length of stay, and socioeconomic factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2016 to 2021, we identified liver transplant admissions using ICD-10 PCS codes 0FY00Z1 and 0FY00Z2. Demographic characteristics (age, sex, race, insurance status, and income quartile), clinical outcomes, and resource utilization metrics were analyzed. One-way ANOVA and Hensel's test were used to assess variance and distribution homogeneity, with a significance threshold of <i>p</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 9677 liver transplant admissions were analyzed. The mean recipient age remained stable (51-52 years), with males comprising ~62% of transplants. White patients constituted the largest group of recipients (~66-68%), followed by Hispanic (~14-17%) and Black patients (~7-10%). The proportion of transplants relative to liver failure admissions remained stable across racial groups, indicating no widening racial gap during the study period. In-hospital mortality post-transplant remained low (2.37-3.52%) and did not differ significantly by race (<i>p</i> = 0.23), sex (<i>p</i> = 0.24), or income quartile (<i>p</i> = 0.13). Similarly, Charlson Comorbidity Index > 5 did not predict inpatient mortality (<i>p</i> = 0.154). Hospital charges ranged from $578,000 to $766,000, with an average stay of ~21 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Liver transplantation outcomes, including in-hospital mortality, appear consistent across demographic and socioeconomic groups once patients are admitted for transplant. However, broader disparities in access persist, necessitating further research into pre-transplant barriers and long-term outcomes. These findings support the need for equitable healthcare strategies aimed at optimizing transplant candidacy and survival across all populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":74152,"journal":{"name":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"13 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12195059/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13020066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Liver transplantation has become the standard of care for patients with end-stage liver disease. Despite advances in surgical techniques, immunosuppression, and perioperative care, disparities in access and outcomes persist across demographic and socioeconomic lines.
Objective: To assess trends and disparities in liver transplant admissions in the United States from 2016 to 2021, examining demographic patterns, in-hospital mortality, hospital charges, length of stay, and socioeconomic factors.
Methods: Using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2016 to 2021, we identified liver transplant admissions using ICD-10 PCS codes 0FY00Z1 and 0FY00Z2. Demographic characteristics (age, sex, race, insurance status, and income quartile), clinical outcomes, and resource utilization metrics were analyzed. One-way ANOVA and Hensel's test were used to assess variance and distribution homogeneity, with a significance threshold of p < 0.05.
Results: A total of 9677 liver transplant admissions were analyzed. The mean recipient age remained stable (51-52 years), with males comprising ~62% of transplants. White patients constituted the largest group of recipients (~66-68%), followed by Hispanic (~14-17%) and Black patients (~7-10%). The proportion of transplants relative to liver failure admissions remained stable across racial groups, indicating no widening racial gap during the study period. In-hospital mortality post-transplant remained low (2.37-3.52%) and did not differ significantly by race (p = 0.23), sex (p = 0.24), or income quartile (p = 0.13). Similarly, Charlson Comorbidity Index > 5 did not predict inpatient mortality (p = 0.154). Hospital charges ranged from $578,000 to $766,000, with an average stay of ~21 days.
Conclusions: Liver transplantation outcomes, including in-hospital mortality, appear consistent across demographic and socioeconomic groups once patients are admitted for transplant. However, broader disparities in access persist, necessitating further research into pre-transplant barriers and long-term outcomes. These findings support the need for equitable healthcare strategies aimed at optimizing transplant candidacy and survival across all populations.