A Multidisciplinary Survey Comparing Academic and Community Critical Care Clinicians' ARDS Practice and the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Diane Masket, Carey C Thomson, Andre Carlos Kajdacsy-Balla Amaral, Catherine L Hough, Nicholas J Johnson, David A Kaufman, Jonathan M Siner, Jennifer P Stevens, Lipisha Agarwal, Peymaan Banankhah, Marcel Casasola, Adriana Flores, Brenda D Garcia, Joseph Khoory, Giulia Paliotti, Arashdeep Rupal, Harpreet Singh, Alex Walker, Joe Watson, Curtis H Weiss
{"title":"A Multidisciplinary Survey Comparing Academic and Community Critical Care Clinicians' ARDS Practice and the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Diane Masket, Carey C Thomson, Andre Carlos Kajdacsy-Balla Amaral, Catherine L Hough, Nicholas J Johnson, David A Kaufman, Jonathan M Siner, Jennifer P Stevens, Lipisha Agarwal, Peymaan Banankhah, Marcel Casasola, Adriana Flores, Brenda D Garcia, Joseph Khoory, Giulia Paliotti, Arashdeep Rupal, Harpreet Singh, Alex Walker, Joe Watson, Curtis H Weiss","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202501-089OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Barriers to recognizing and treating acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) exist. Prior studies have not investigated whether these barriers differ between academic and community settings, nor whether there were differences in critical care clinicians' reported ARDS management strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Grounded in the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we sought to determine whether there are differences between academic and community critical care clinicians in their team- and ICU-based culture; interprofessional communication; knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers to ARDS recognition and management; and their ICU organization and ARDS management associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multidisciplinary survey from September, 2020 to April, 2021 of critical care physicians, nurses, advanced practice providers, and respiratory therapists (RTs) in six academic and nine community hospitals across the United States and Canada. Individual item and cumulative domain scores were compared between academic and community clinicians. Statistical adjustment was performed for multiple comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1,906 clinicians responded to at least one survey item (53% response rate). Mean (SD) culture scores were higher for community physicians vs. academic physicians (5.3 [1.8] vs. 4.4 [2.0], <i>P</i><0.001) and community nurses vs. academic nurses (4.4 [2.2] vs. 3.8 [2.1], <i>P</i>=0.007). Academic nurses and RTs had higher knowledge scores compared to community nurses and RTs (<i>P</i><0.001 for each comparison). Community physicians, nurses, and RTs reported higher mean (SD) number of changes in ICU organization and practice during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to academic clinicians (e.g., community physicians: 13.7 [2.7] changes vs. academic physicians: 11.8 [4.3] changes, <i>P</i>=0.001). While academic physicians, nurses, and RTs were approximately twice as likely to care for ARDS patients daily or several days per week compared to community clinicians, ARDS management, attitudes, and belief in evidence was similar between academic and community clinicians in most respects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A large, multidisciplinary survey identified differences between academic and community critical care clinicians' culture and knowledge in the care of ARDS patients. The COVID-19 pandemic had a greater impact on community ICU organization and ARDS management. Multifaceted implementation strategies should target implementation barriers differently in academic and community settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":93876,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202501-089OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Barriers to recognizing and treating acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) exist. Prior studies have not investigated whether these barriers differ between academic and community settings, nor whether there were differences in critical care clinicians' reported ARDS management strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Objectives: Grounded in the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we sought to determine whether there are differences between academic and community critical care clinicians in their team- and ICU-based culture; interprofessional communication; knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers to ARDS recognition and management; and their ICU organization and ARDS management associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: Multidisciplinary survey from September, 2020 to April, 2021 of critical care physicians, nurses, advanced practice providers, and respiratory therapists (RTs) in six academic and nine community hospitals across the United States and Canada. Individual item and cumulative domain scores were compared between academic and community clinicians. Statistical adjustment was performed for multiple comparisons.

Results: 1,906 clinicians responded to at least one survey item (53% response rate). Mean (SD) culture scores were higher for community physicians vs. academic physicians (5.3 [1.8] vs. 4.4 [2.0], P<0.001) and community nurses vs. academic nurses (4.4 [2.2] vs. 3.8 [2.1], P=0.007). Academic nurses and RTs had higher knowledge scores compared to community nurses and RTs (P<0.001 for each comparison). Community physicians, nurses, and RTs reported higher mean (SD) number of changes in ICU organization and practice during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to academic clinicians (e.g., community physicians: 13.7 [2.7] changes vs. academic physicians: 11.8 [4.3] changes, P=0.001). While academic physicians, nurses, and RTs were approximately twice as likely to care for ARDS patients daily or several days per week compared to community clinicians, ARDS management, attitudes, and belief in evidence was similar between academic and community clinicians in most respects.

Conclusions: A large, multidisciplinary survey identified differences between academic and community critical care clinicians' culture and knowledge in the care of ARDS patients. The COVID-19 pandemic had a greater impact on community ICU organization and ARDS management. Multifaceted implementation strategies should target implementation barriers differently in academic and community settings.

一项比较学术和社区重症监护临床医生ARDS实践与COVID-19大流行的多学科调查
理由:存在识别和治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的障碍。先前的研究没有调查这些障碍在学术和社区环境之间是否存在差异,也没有调查在COVID-19大流行期间重症监护临床医生报告的ARDS管理策略是否存在差异。目的:基于实施研究的综合框架,我们试图确定学术和社区重症监护临床医生在以团队和重症监护病房为基础的文化中是否存在差异;interprofessional沟通;认识和管理ARDS的知识、态度和感知障碍;以及与COVID-19大流行相关的ICU组织和ARDS管理。方法:从2020年9月至2021年4月,对美国和加拿大6家学术医院和9家社区医院的重症监护医师、护士、高级执业医师和呼吸治疗师(RTs)进行多学科调查。比较学术和社区临床医生的单项和累积领域得分。对多重比较进行统计学调整。结果:1906名临床医生对至少一个调查项目有应答(有效率53%)。社区医生的平均(SD)文化评分高于学术医生(5.3[1.8]对4.4 [2.0],PP=0.007)。学院派护士和实习护士的知识得分高于社区护士和实习护士(PP=0.001)。虽然与社区临床医生相比,学术医生、护士和临床医生每天或每周几天护理ARDS患者的可能性大约是社区临床医生的两倍,但学术医生和社区临床医生在ARDS管理、态度和对证据的信念在大多数方面是相似的。结论:一项大型的多学科调查发现了学术和社区重症监护临床医生在ARDS患者护理方面的文化和知识差异。COVID-19大流行对社区ICU组织和ARDS管理的影响较大。多方面的实施战略应针对学术和社区环境中不同的实施障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信