Samuel K McGowan, Hayley B Gershengorn, Andrew Sudler, Edie Espejo, John Boscardin, Lingsheng Li, Alexander K Smith, Deepshikha C Ashana, Karthik Raghunathan, Shannen Kim, Teva Brender, Kristen Vossler, Mary Han, Julien Cobert
{"title":"Patient Race and Preferred Language Influence the Use of Physical Restraints in Non-intubated ICU Patients.","authors":"Samuel K McGowan, Hayley B Gershengorn, Andrew Sudler, Edie Espejo, John Boscardin, Lingsheng Li, Alexander K Smith, Deepshikha C Ashana, Karthik Raghunathan, Shannen Kim, Teva Brender, Kristen Vossler, Mary Han, Julien Cobert","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202411-1143OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Physical limb restraints are commonly used in intensive care units (ICUs) to protect patients and staff but are associated with increased morbidity. While many intubated patients in the US are physically restrained, predictors for restraints in non-intubated patients remain less clear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify whether patient race, ethnicity, and preferred language are associated with restraint use in non-intubated patients across multiple ICUs in a large US hospital system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study using electronic health record (EHR) data across five ICUs within the University of California, San Francisco from 2013-2022. We included adults ≥18 years of age. We excluded patients who received mechanical ventilation during their ICU stay. Our primary independent variables were primary language and race. The outcome of interest was restraint use, defined as at least one restraint order placed during the patient's ICU stay. We modeled any restraint use using a multivariable logistic regression adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical covariates and explored interactions of our two primary exposures using sensitivity analyses and Wald testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across 22,259 unique ICU admissions, we identified 11,676 non-ventilated patients. Of these, 2,411 (20%) received an order for physical restraints. In a multivariable regression model, compared to English language, Chinese language (All Dialects) (OR 1.57 [95% CI 1.31, 1.87]) and a language other than Chinese, English or Spanish (OR 1.60 [95% CI 1.36, 1.89]) were associated with increased use of restraints. Patients identifying as Black or African American were also more likely to be restrained at least once during the encounter (OR 1.51 [95% CI 1.27 - 1.79]) compared to Non-Hispanic White patients. Dialysis (OR 9.15 [95% CI 7.74, 10.83]), tube feeds (OR 4.65 [95% CI 3.44, 6.29]), and SOFA score (OR 1.17 [95% CI 1.15, 1.19] per 1 point increase) also independently increased odds of restraint use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients preferring a language other than English or Spanish and those identifying as Black are more likely to be restrained in the ICU when not intubated. Interventions to minimize the use of unnecessary physical restraints could improve an inequity known to be associated with downstream harms.</p>","PeriodicalId":93876,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202411-1143OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rationale: Physical limb restraints are commonly used in intensive care units (ICUs) to protect patients and staff but are associated with increased morbidity. While many intubated patients in the US are physically restrained, predictors for restraints in non-intubated patients remain less clear.
Objective: To identify whether patient race, ethnicity, and preferred language are associated with restraint use in non-intubated patients across multiple ICUs in a large US hospital system.
Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using electronic health record (EHR) data across five ICUs within the University of California, San Francisco from 2013-2022. We included adults ≥18 years of age. We excluded patients who received mechanical ventilation during their ICU stay. Our primary independent variables were primary language and race. The outcome of interest was restraint use, defined as at least one restraint order placed during the patient's ICU stay. We modeled any restraint use using a multivariable logistic regression adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical covariates and explored interactions of our two primary exposures using sensitivity analyses and Wald testing.
Results: Across 22,259 unique ICU admissions, we identified 11,676 non-ventilated patients. Of these, 2,411 (20%) received an order for physical restraints. In a multivariable regression model, compared to English language, Chinese language (All Dialects) (OR 1.57 [95% CI 1.31, 1.87]) and a language other than Chinese, English or Spanish (OR 1.60 [95% CI 1.36, 1.89]) were associated with increased use of restraints. Patients identifying as Black or African American were also more likely to be restrained at least once during the encounter (OR 1.51 [95% CI 1.27 - 1.79]) compared to Non-Hispanic White patients. Dialysis (OR 9.15 [95% CI 7.74, 10.83]), tube feeds (OR 4.65 [95% CI 3.44, 6.29]), and SOFA score (OR 1.17 [95% CI 1.15, 1.19] per 1 point increase) also independently increased odds of restraint use.
Conclusions: Patients preferring a language other than English or Spanish and those identifying as Black are more likely to be restrained in the ICU when not intubated. Interventions to minimize the use of unnecessary physical restraints could improve an inequity known to be associated with downstream harms.
理由:物理肢体约束通常用于重症监护病房(icu),以保护患者和工作人员,但与发病率增加有关。虽然美国许多插管患者受到身体限制,但非插管患者受到限制的预测因素仍不太清楚。目的:确定患者的种族、民族和首选语言是否与美国一家大型医院系统中多个icu非插管患者的约束使用有关。方法:我们使用2013-2022年加州大学旧金山分校五个icu的电子健康记录(EHR)数据进行了一项回顾性队列研究。我们纳入了年龄≥18岁的成年人。我们排除了在ICU住院期间接受机械通气的患者。我们的主要独立变量是主要语言和种族。关注的结果是约束使用,定义为患者在ICU住院期间至少有一个约束令。我们使用多变量逻辑回归对社会人口统计学和临床协变量进行了调整,并使用敏感性分析和Wald检验探索了我们的两个主要暴露的相互作用。结果:在22259例ICU住院患者中,我们确定了11676例非通气患者。其中,2411人(20%)收到了身体限制的命令。在多变量回归模型中,与英语相比,汉语(所有方言)(OR为1.57 [95% CI 1.31, 1.87])和汉语、英语或西班牙语以外的其他语言(OR为1.60 [95% CI 1.36, 1.89])与约束使用增加相关。与非西班牙裔白人患者相比,黑人或非裔美国人患者在遭遇过程中至少有一次被约束的可能性更大(or 1.51 [95% CI 1.27 - 1.79])。透析(OR 9.15 [95% CI 7.74, 10.83])、管饲(OR 4.65 [95% CI 3.44, 6.29])和SOFA评分(OR 1.17 [95% CI 1.15, 1.19]每增加1分)也单独增加了约束使用的几率。结论:选择英语或西班牙语以外的语言的患者和那些被认为是黑人的患者在不插管时更有可能在ICU受到约束。尽量减少使用不必要的身体限制的干预措施可以改善已知与下游危害相关的不平等。