Long-Term Effectiveness of Tobacco Smoking Cessation Interventions in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Dadang Saadulloh,  Rohman, Fitrian Rayasari, Amelia Ganefianty, Ninik Yunitri, Kuei-Ru Chou
{"title":"Long-Term Effectiveness of Tobacco Smoking Cessation Interventions in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials","authors":"Dadang Saadulloh,&nbsp; Rohman,&nbsp;Fitrian Rayasari,&nbsp;Amelia Ganefianty,&nbsp;Ninik Yunitri,&nbsp;Kuei-Ru Chou","doi":"10.1111/jnu.70024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Smoking is a major global health problem. It kills more than half of the users. At least 1.18 billion people smoked cigarettes every day as of 2020. Although many interventions for tobacco smoking cessation have been implemented, their effectiveness remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the long-term effectiveness of various smoking cessation interventions in adults.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials reporting long-term outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Evidence searches were conducted in the Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline-OVID, PubMed, Web of Science, and Clinicaltrials.gov. Two researchers searched until August 2023 without restrictions on country, language, or year of publication. The risk ratio (RR) for continuous abstinence was obtained through biochemical verification at measurements ≥ 6 months post-intervention. Data were extracted and assessed for quality using Risk of Bias 2. Meta-analysis was carried out using a random effects model. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed to explore moderator variables. Sensitivity and publication bias analyses were also performed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-two effect sizes from 13 studies showed that tobacco smoking cessation interventions increased continuous abstinence by 2.5 times (RR 3.52; 95% CI; 2.19–5.65). The highest ratio was in the behavioral intervention (RR 7.83) with more than 6 months of therapy (RR 10.57). The tobacco smoking cessation intervention worked better in 55–64 years (RR 7.29), especially in Asia (RR 10.08). The intervention was more effective for female respondents (RR 4.21) and combination therapy format (RR 3.82). However, meta-regression showed that differences in gender and therapy format did not significantly influence the effectiveness of tobacco smoking cessation interventions in adults (<i>p</i> values 0.2748 and 0.8769). Sensitivity analysis (<i>p</i>-value 0.0025) further strengthens the evidence of the conclusions and credibility of the findings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Behavioral therapy lasting more than 6 months was the most successful tobacco smoking cessation intervention in respondents aged 55–64 years, especially when implemented in Asia. Although not significant, therapies delivered in combination formats, especially in women, have the potential to increase continuous abstinence for adults. These findings provide important evidence for developing effective prevention and treatment strategies for long-term smoking cessation concerning the type, format, and total of therapy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51091,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Scholarship","volume":"57 5","pages":"728-740"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://sigmapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jnu.70024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Smoking is a major global health problem. It kills more than half of the users. At least 1.18 billion people smoked cigarettes every day as of 2020. Although many interventions for tobacco smoking cessation have been implemented, their effectiveness remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the long-term effectiveness of various smoking cessation interventions in adults.

Design

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials reporting long-term outcomes.

Methods

Evidence searches were conducted in the Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline-OVID, PubMed, Web of Science, and Clinicaltrials.gov. Two researchers searched until August 2023 without restrictions on country, language, or year of publication. The risk ratio (RR) for continuous abstinence was obtained through biochemical verification at measurements ≥ 6 months post-intervention. Data were extracted and assessed for quality using Risk of Bias 2. Meta-analysis was carried out using a random effects model. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed to explore moderator variables. Sensitivity and publication bias analyses were also performed.

Results

Twenty-two effect sizes from 13 studies showed that tobacco smoking cessation interventions increased continuous abstinence by 2.5 times (RR 3.52; 95% CI; 2.19–5.65). The highest ratio was in the behavioral intervention (RR 7.83) with more than 6 months of therapy (RR 10.57). The tobacco smoking cessation intervention worked better in 55–64 years (RR 7.29), especially in Asia (RR 10.08). The intervention was more effective for female respondents (RR 4.21) and combination therapy format (RR 3.82). However, meta-regression showed that differences in gender and therapy format did not significantly influence the effectiveness of tobacco smoking cessation interventions in adults (p values 0.2748 and 0.8769). Sensitivity analysis (p-value 0.0025) further strengthens the evidence of the conclusions and credibility of the findings.

Conclusion

Behavioral therapy lasting more than 6 months was the most successful tobacco smoking cessation intervention in respondents aged 55–64 years, especially when implemented in Asia. Although not significant, therapies delivered in combination formats, especially in women, have the potential to increase continuous abstinence for adults. These findings provide important evidence for developing effective prevention and treatment strategies for long-term smoking cessation concerning the type, format, and total of therapy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

成人戒烟干预的长期有效性:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:吸烟是一个主要的全球健康问题。它杀死了超过一半的使用者。截至2020年,每天至少有11.8亿人吸烟。虽然已经实施了许多戒烟干预措施,但其效果尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估各种成人戒烟干预措施的长期有效性。设计:我们对报告长期结果的随机对照试验进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。方法:在Cochrane Library、Embase、Medline-OVID、PubMed、Web of Science和Clinicaltrials.gov中进行证据检索。两名研究人员搜索到2023年8月,没有国家、语言或出版年份的限制。干预后≥6个月,通过生化验证获得持续戒断的危险比(RR)。提取数据并使用Risk of Bias 2评估其质量。采用随机效应模型进行meta分析。采用亚组分析和元回归探讨调节变量。还进行了敏感性和发表偏倚分析。结果:来自13项研究的22个效应量显示,戒烟干预使持续戒烟增加了2.5倍(RR 3.52;95%可信区间;2.19 - -5.65)。治疗超过6个月的行为干预组(RR为7.83)比例最高(RR为10.57)。戒烟干预在55-64岁的人群中效果更好(RR 7.29),尤其是在亚洲(RR 10.08)。干预对女性受访者(RR 4.21)和联合治疗形式(RR 3.82)更有效。然而,meta回归显示,性别和治疗形式的差异对成人戒烟干预的有效性没有显著影响(p值分别为0.2748和0.8769)。敏感性分析(p值0.0025)进一步加强了结论的证据性和研究结果的可信度。结论:在55-64岁的受访者中,持续6个月以上的行为疗法是最成功的戒烟干预措施,尤其是在亚洲实施时。虽然不显著,但以联合形式提供的治疗,特别是在女性中,有可能增加成年人的持续禁欲。这些发现为制定有效的长期戒烟的预防和治疗策略提供了重要的证据,包括治疗的类型、形式和总量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This widely read and respected journal features peer-reviewed, thought-provoking articles representing research by some of the world’s leading nurse researchers. Reaching health professionals, faculty and students in 103 countries, the Journal of Nursing Scholarship is focused on health of people throughout the world. It is the official journal of Sigma Theta Tau International and it reflects the society’s dedication to providing the tools necessary to improve nursing care around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信