"Determining the minimum important differences for field walking tests in adults with long-term conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis". E. Daynes, R.E. Barker, A.V. Jones, et al. Eur Respir Rev 2025; 34: 240198.

IF 9 1区医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM

European Respiratory Review Pub Date : 2025-06-18 Print Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1183/16000617.5198-2024

引用次数: 0

查看原文本刊更多论文

“确定有长期疾病的成人实地行走试验的最小重要差异：系统回顾和荟萃分析”。戴恩斯，R.E.巴克，A.V.琼斯等。Eur Respir Rev 2025；34: 240198。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

European Respiratory Review Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

CiteScore

14.40

自引率

1.30%

发文量

审稿时长

24 weeks

期刊介绍： The European Respiratory Review (ERR) is an open-access journal published by the European Respiratory Society (ERS), serving as a vital resource for respiratory professionals by delivering updates on medicine, science, and surgery in the field. ERR features state-of-the-art review articles, editorials, correspondence, and summaries of recent research findings and studies covering a wide range of topics including COPD, asthma, pulmonary hypertension, interstitial lung disease, lung cancer, tuberculosis, and pulmonary infections. Articles are published continuously and compiled into quarterly issues within a single annual volume.