Geometric error compensation through position feedback modification and comparison of correction strategies in 3- axis machine-tool

IF 6.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Flore Guevel , Fabien Viprey , Charly Euzenat , Guillaume Fromentin , Ugo Masciantonio
{"title":"Geometric error compensation through position feedback modification and comparison of correction strategies in 3- axis machine-tool","authors":"Flore Guevel ,&nbsp;Fabien Viprey ,&nbsp;Charly Euzenat ,&nbsp;Guillaume Fromentin ,&nbsp;Ugo Masciantonio","doi":"10.1016/j.jmapro.2025.06.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In machine-tools, geometrical defects are unavoidable. They can greatly affect the dimensional accuracy of the final workpiece if not corrected. Software compensation strategies are less expensive than mechanical adjustments and they provide great improvement in volumetric accuracy. In this study, different compensation methods are compared in a 3-axis milling applications: Numerical Controller (NC) internal compensation tables, modification of the programmed tool-path (G-code) and modification of position feedback signals. The latter is the main purpose of this work, because it shows great potential and is not linked to one particular type of NC. It communicates with a custom software application that processes the position data and generates corrected signals according to a geometric model based on the rigid body assumption. The NC is then induced to perform volumetric error correction based on its default programming. The compensation methods are compared based on their ability to bring out or correct imposed geometric errors. The highlighted solution shows performances comparable to the G-code modification by correcting more than 96% of the imposed geometric errors without affecting the numerical chain from the program generation to its execution on the machine. It is also independent of the NC or the motors control cards.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16148,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manufacturing Processes","volume":"150 ","pages":"Pages 213-223"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manufacturing Processes","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526612525006796","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In machine-tools, geometrical defects are unavoidable. They can greatly affect the dimensional accuracy of the final workpiece if not corrected. Software compensation strategies are less expensive than mechanical adjustments and they provide great improvement in volumetric accuracy. In this study, different compensation methods are compared in a 3-axis milling applications: Numerical Controller (NC) internal compensation tables, modification of the programmed tool-path (G-code) and modification of position feedback signals. The latter is the main purpose of this work, because it shows great potential and is not linked to one particular type of NC. It communicates with a custom software application that processes the position data and generates corrected signals according to a geometric model based on the rigid body assumption. The NC is then induced to perform volumetric error correction based on its default programming. The compensation methods are compared based on their ability to bring out or correct imposed geometric errors. The highlighted solution shows performances comparable to the G-code modification by correcting more than 96% of the imposed geometric errors without affecting the numerical chain from the program generation to its execution on the machine. It is also independent of the NC or the motors control cards.
基于位置反馈修正的三轴机床几何误差补偿及修正策略的比较
在机床中,几何缺陷是不可避免的。如果不加以纠正,它们会极大地影响最终工件的尺寸精度。软件补偿策略比机械调整更便宜,并且它们在体积精度方面提供了很大的改进。在本研究中,比较了三轴铣削应用中不同的补偿方法:数控(NC)内部补偿表,修改编程刀具轨迹(g代码)和修改位置反馈信号。后者是这项工作的主要目的,因为它显示出巨大的潜力,并且与特定类型的NC无关。它与定制软件应用程序通信,该应用程序处理位置数据并根据基于刚体假设的几何模型生成校正信号。然后诱导NC执行基于其默认编程的体积误差校正。对补偿方法进行了比较,分析了补偿方法对强加几何误差的补偿能力。突出显示的解决方案显示出与g代码修改相当的性能,在不影响从程序生成到在机器上执行的数值链的情况下,纠正了96%以上的强加几何误差。它也独立于NC或电机控制卡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Manufacturing Processes
Journal of Manufacturing Processes ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING-
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
11.30%
发文量
833
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Manufacturing Processes (JMP) is to exchange current and future directions of manufacturing processes research, development and implementation, and to publish archival scholarly literature with a view to advancing state-of-the-art manufacturing processes and encouraging innovation for developing new and efficient processes. The journal will also publish from other research communities for rapid communication of innovative new concepts. Special-topic issues on emerging technologies and invited papers will also be published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信