Test-retest variability of the full-field stimulus test in patients with retinitis pigmentosa: REPEAT Study Report No. 4.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
J S Karuntu, S B A E Tulp, C J F Boon
{"title":"Test-retest variability of the full-field stimulus test in patients with retinitis pigmentosa: REPEAT Study Report No. 4.","authors":"J S Karuntu, S B A E Tulp, C J F Boon","doi":"10.1111/aos.17532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate test-retest variability (TRV) of the full-field stimulus test (FST) in patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) and poor best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA; ≤20/50 Snellen; ≥0.40 logMAR), and to assess the reliability of FST as a clinical endpoint in future RP trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective cohort study, 28 patients with clinically diagnosed RP performed FST (Diagnosys) on two different days, 2 weeks apart. Retinal sensitivity estimates on FST for blue, red, and white stimuli were determined, and the difference between blue and red thresholds was calculated to identify photoreceptor mediation type. TRV was analysed using Bland-Altman analyses and coefficients of repeatability (CoRs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients had a median age of 38.0 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 24.5-57.5), and a median BCVA of 1.1 logMAR (IQR: 0.6-1.2). Following Bland-Altman analyses, learning effects (biases) across the FST measurements were minimal, ranging from -0.02 to 0.02 log units. The CoRs were ± 0.38 log units (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30-0.52) for blue stimuli, ±0.30 log units (95%CI: 0.23-0.40) for red stimuli, ±0.59 log units (95%CI: 0.47-0.81) for white stimuli, and ± 0.30 log units (95%CI: 0.24-0.41) for the blue-red difference. Patients with mixed photoreceptor mediation had a higher TRV than those with rod or cone mediation. Age was a significant predictor of TRV on blue light FST (p = 0.028).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings support the use of FST as a reliable measurement of retinal sensitivity in patients with RP, and provide a strong foundation for developing clinical endpoints for FST based on the CoRs to improve assessment of changes in RP, for example, before and after treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":6915,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ophthalmologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.17532","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate test-retest variability (TRV) of the full-field stimulus test (FST) in patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) and poor best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA; ≤20/50 Snellen; ≥0.40 logMAR), and to assess the reliability of FST as a clinical endpoint in future RP trials.

Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 28 patients with clinically diagnosed RP performed FST (Diagnosys) on two different days, 2 weeks apart. Retinal sensitivity estimates on FST for blue, red, and white stimuli were determined, and the difference between blue and red thresholds was calculated to identify photoreceptor mediation type. TRV was analysed using Bland-Altman analyses and coefficients of repeatability (CoRs).

Results: Patients had a median age of 38.0 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 24.5-57.5), and a median BCVA of 1.1 logMAR (IQR: 0.6-1.2). Following Bland-Altman analyses, learning effects (biases) across the FST measurements were minimal, ranging from -0.02 to 0.02 log units. The CoRs were ± 0.38 log units (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30-0.52) for blue stimuli, ±0.30 log units (95%CI: 0.23-0.40) for red stimuli, ±0.59 log units (95%CI: 0.47-0.81) for white stimuli, and ± 0.30 log units (95%CI: 0.24-0.41) for the blue-red difference. Patients with mixed photoreceptor mediation had a higher TRV than those with rod or cone mediation. Age was a significant predictor of TRV on blue light FST (p = 0.028).

Conclusions: These findings support the use of FST as a reliable measurement of retinal sensitivity in patients with RP, and provide a strong foundation for developing clinical endpoints for FST based on the CoRs to improve assessment of changes in RP, for example, before and after treatment.

视网膜色素变性患者全视野刺激试验的重测变异性:REPEAT研究报告第4号。
目的:评价色素性视网膜炎(RP)和最佳矫正视力(BCVA)较差患者的全视野刺激试验(FST)的试重试变异性(TRV);≤Snellen 20/50;≥0.40 logMAR),并评估FST作为未来RP试验临床终点的可靠性。方法:在这项前瞻性队列研究中,28例临床诊断为RP的患者在两个不同的日子(间隔2周)进行FST(诊断)。确定了FST对蓝色、红色和白色刺激的视网膜敏感性估计,并计算了蓝色和红色阈值之间的差异,以确定光感受器中介类型。采用Bland-Altman分析和重复性系数(CoRs)分析TRV。结果:患者中位年龄为38.0岁(四分位数间距[IQR]: 24.5-57.5),中位BCVA为1.1 logMAR (IQR: 0.6-1.2)。根据Bland-Altman分析,FST测量的学习效应(偏差)最小,范围从-0.02到0.02 log单位。蓝色刺激的CoRs为±0.38对数单位(95%可信区间[CI]: 0.30-0.52),红色刺激的CoRs为±0.30对数单位(95%CI: 0.23-0.40),白色刺激的CoRs为±0.59对数单位(95%CI: 0.47-0.81),蓝红差异的CoRs为±0.30对数单位(95%CI: 0.24-0.41)。混合光感受器介导组的TRV高于杆状或锥状介导组。年龄是TRV对蓝光FST的显著预测因子(p = 0.028)。结论:这些发现支持使用FST作为RP患者视网膜敏感性的可靠测量,并为基于CoRs开发FST的临床终点提供了坚实的基础,以改善RP变化的评估,例如治疗前后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Ophthalmologica
Acta Ophthalmologica 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
433
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Acta Ophthalmologica is published on behalf of the Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation and is the official scientific publication of the following societies: The Danish Ophthalmological Society, The Finnish Ophthalmological Society, The Icelandic Ophthalmological Society, The Norwegian Ophthalmological Society and The Swedish Ophthalmological Society, and also the European Association for Vision and Eye Research (EVER). Acta Ophthalmologica publishes clinical and experimental original articles, reviews, editorials, educational photo essays (Diagnosis and Therapy in Ophthalmology), case reports and case series, letters to the editor and doctoral theses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信