Financial Sustainability Above All Else? Drivers and Types of Pension Reform Recommendations in EU Socio-economic Governance

IF 3.3 1区 社会学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Jan Helmdag, Niko Väänänen
{"title":"Financial Sustainability Above All Else? Drivers and Types of Pension Reform Recommendations in EU Socio-economic Governance","authors":"Jan Helmdag,&nbsp;Niko Väänänen","doi":"10.1111/jcms.13700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The average age of the population and the ratio of workers to pensioners in the European Union (EU) are rising, putting increasing pressure on the long-term sustainability of pension systems. To counteract this development, a large number of pension reform recommendations (PRRs) have been issued within EU socio-economic governance. In this article, we analyse the extent to which PRRs are consistent with the three main objectives of the open method of coordination (OMC), which emphasise (i) <i>financial sustainability</i>, (ii) <i>benefit adequacy</i> and (iii) <i>modernisation</i> with respect to gender equality. Using an original dataset, we code 438 PRRs from 2011 to 2023 and analyse the extent to which these are consistent with the three main objectives of the OMC. Our results show that PRRs are primarily focused on financial sustainability, to the detriment of adequacy and modernisation, and that they are driven solely by sustainability concerns.</p>","PeriodicalId":51369,"journal":{"name":"Jcms-Journal of Common Market Studies","volume":"63 4","pages":"1236-1258"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jcms.13700","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jcms-Journal of Common Market Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcms.13700","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The average age of the population and the ratio of workers to pensioners in the European Union (EU) are rising, putting increasing pressure on the long-term sustainability of pension systems. To counteract this development, a large number of pension reform recommendations (PRRs) have been issued within EU socio-economic governance. In this article, we analyse the extent to which PRRs are consistent with the three main objectives of the open method of coordination (OMC), which emphasise (i) financial sustainability, (ii) benefit adequacy and (iii) modernisation with respect to gender equality. Using an original dataset, we code 438 PRRs from 2011 to 2023 and analyse the extent to which these are consistent with the three main objectives of the OMC. Our results show that PRRs are primarily focused on financial sustainability, to the detriment of adequacy and modernisation, and that they are driven solely by sustainability concerns.

Abstract Image

财务可持续性高于一切?欧盟社会经济治理中养老金改革建议的驱动因素和类型
欧盟人口的平均年龄和工人与养老金领取者的比例正在上升,这给养老金制度的长期可持续性带来了越来越大的压力。为了应对这种发展,欧盟社会经济治理内部发布了大量养老金改革建议(PRRs)。在本文中,我们分析了PRRs与开放式协调方法(OMC)的三个主要目标的一致程度,这些目标强调(i)财务可持续性,(ii)利益充足性和(iii)性别平等方面的现代化。使用原始数据集,我们对2011年至2023年的438个PRRs进行了编码,并分析了这些PRRs与OMC的三个主要目标一致的程度。我们的研究结果表明,PRRs主要关注财务可持续性,而不利于充分性和现代化,并且它们仅受可持续性问题的驱动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
137
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信