The systemic procedural injustice faced by victim-survivors in police responses to rape and ‘serious’ sexual offences: A comprehensive study of four forces in England and Wales

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Olivia Smith , Kelly Johnson , Oona Brooks-Hay , Ruth Friskney , Sophie Geoghegan-Fittall , Susan Hillyard , Katrin Hohl , Bethany Jennings , Sarah Molisso , Andy Myhill , Rosa Walling-Wefelmeyer
{"title":"The systemic procedural injustice faced by victim-survivors in police responses to rape and ‘serious’ sexual offences: A comprehensive study of four forces in England and Wales","authors":"Olivia Smith ,&nbsp;Kelly Johnson ,&nbsp;Oona Brooks-Hay ,&nbsp;Ruth Friskney ,&nbsp;Sophie Geoghegan-Fittall ,&nbsp;Susan Hillyard ,&nbsp;Katrin Hohl ,&nbsp;Bethany Jennings ,&nbsp;Sarah Molisso ,&nbsp;Andy Myhill ,&nbsp;Rosa Walling-Wefelmeyer","doi":"10.1016/j.ijlcj.2025.100756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Drawing on a large multi-method study in England and Wales, this paper outlines key challenges to procedural justice faced by victim-survivors in contemporary police responses to rape and ‘serious’ sexual offences. It draws on an innovative dataset – involving ‘real-time’ police ethnographic observations and review of police video footage, combined with supporting stakeholder focus groups and interviews – to provide a multifaceted, holistic examination of police responses. We identify significant variation in the quality of police responses to victim-survivors, which include concerning practices such as insensitive and inconsiderate treatment, cynical attitudes, and investigations being influenced by rape myths. Without reform, we conclude the policing system provides limited opportunity for dignity, respect, equity, safety or voice; all known to be important for procedural justice and victim-survivor justice more broadly. Steps towards improving the experience and treatment of victim-survivors must address these systemic issues over focusing on the actions of individual officers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46026,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law Crime and Justice","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 100756"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law Crime and Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1756061625000321","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drawing on a large multi-method study in England and Wales, this paper outlines key challenges to procedural justice faced by victim-survivors in contemporary police responses to rape and ‘serious’ sexual offences. It draws on an innovative dataset – involving ‘real-time’ police ethnographic observations and review of police video footage, combined with supporting stakeholder focus groups and interviews – to provide a multifaceted, holistic examination of police responses. We identify significant variation in the quality of police responses to victim-survivors, which include concerning practices such as insensitive and inconsiderate treatment, cynical attitudes, and investigations being influenced by rape myths. Without reform, we conclude the policing system provides limited opportunity for dignity, respect, equity, safety or voice; all known to be important for procedural justice and victim-survivor justice more broadly. Steps towards improving the experience and treatment of victim-survivors must address these systemic issues over focusing on the actions of individual officers.
在警察对强奸和“严重”性犯罪的反应中,受害者幸存者面临的系统性程序不公正:对英格兰和威尔士四种力量的综合研究
根据在英格兰和威尔士进行的一项大型多方法研究,本文概述了在当代警察对强奸和“严重”性犯罪的反应中,受害者-幸存者面临的程序正义的主要挑战。它利用一个创新的数据集——包括“实时”警察人种学观察和对警察视频片段的审查,结合支持利益相关者焦点小组和访谈——对警察的反应提供多方面的全面检查。我们发现警察对受害者-幸存者的反应质量存在显著差异,其中包括不敏感和不体贴的待遇、愤世嫉俗的态度以及受强奸神话影响的调查等做法。如果不进行改革,我们得出的结论是,警务系统为尊严、尊重、公平、安全或发言权提供的机会有限;所有这些对于程序正义和更广泛的受害者-幸存者正义都很重要。改善受害者-幸存者的经历和待遇的步骤必须解决这些系统性问题,而不是关注个别官员的行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice is an international and fully peer reviewed journal which welcomes high quality, theoretically informed papers on a wide range of fields linked to criminological research and analysis. It invites submissions relating to: Studies of crime and interpretations of forms and dimensions of criminality; Analyses of criminological debates and contested theoretical frameworks of criminological analysis; Research and analysis of criminal justice and penal policy and practices; Research and analysis of policing policies and policing forms and practices. We particularly welcome submissions relating to more recent and emerging areas of criminological enquiry including cyber-enabled crime, fraud-related crime, terrorism and hate crime.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信