Holly Berns, Kimberly Han, Felipe Ramirez-Velandia, Kailey L Lewis, Sophia E Robertson, Wyatt E Clark, Jesse C Wells, Mohammed K Alnajrani, Christopher Rapoport, Steven Schwartz, Kana'i Hakes, Justin H Granstein, Christopher S Ogilvy, Timothy A Becker, Michael Young
{"title":"Pump Versus Syringe: Aspiration Thrombectomy Direct Pressure Comparisons in a Comprehensive Benchtop 3-Dimensional-Printed Circle of Willis Model.","authors":"Holly Berns, Kimberly Han, Felipe Ramirez-Velandia, Kailey L Lewis, Sophia E Robertson, Wyatt E Clark, Jesse C Wells, Mohammed K Alnajrani, Christopher Rapoport, Steven Schwartz, Kana'i Hakes, Justin H Granstein, Christopher S Ogilvy, Timothy A Becker, Michael Young","doi":"10.1227/ons.0000000000001653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Experiments have shown that 60-cc syringes generate stronger vacuum forces than mechanical pumps. However, few studies have measured catheter tip suction pressure during thrombus engagement. Therefore, this study aimed to compare aspiration forces and pressure drops, generated by mechanical pumps and 60-cc syringes connected to various catheters when aspirating synthetic clots in a 3-dimensional-printed model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The system includes a programmable pulsatile pump, a 3-dimensional-printed tissue-matched circle of Willis model, radiopaque synthetic blood clots positioned in the left internal carotid artery terminus, and pressure recording at 500 ± 10% mL/min and 120/80 ± 10 mm Hg. Each catheter underwent 3 soft and hard clot removal trials using a 60-cc syringe and an aspiration pump. Aspiration source pressure was recorded before, during, and after aspiration. The evaluated variables included engagement pressure change (∆Pengagement), aspiration pressure drops (∆Paspiration), and pressure efficiency (PE), defined as the percentage of peak pressure maintained during aspiration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Aspirating soft clots with syringes showed low engagement pressure drops (∆Pengagement) (0-14 mm Hg), high PE at 93%-99% of Pp, and minimal aspiration pressure drops (∆Paspiration) (6F catheters: 4-8 mm Hg, 8F catheters: 19 mm Hg). Conversely, using a pump generated moderate ∆Pengagement (6F: 16-51 mm Hg, 8F: 122 mm Hg), lower PE (69%-93% of Pp), and greater ∆Paspiration (6F: 143-151 mm Hg, 8F: 270 mm Hg). For hard clots, syringes exhibited minimal ∆Pengagement and ∆Paspiration (4-13 mm Hg and 3-12 mm Hg, respectively), whereas pumps showed moderate ∆Pengagement (2-34 mm Hg) and large ∆Paspiration (6F: 82-162 mm Hg, 8F: 280 mm Hg).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Syringe aspiration generates higher vacuum pressures and smaller pressure drops than aspiration pumps, likely because of vacuum tubing resistance in aspiration pumps. This effect is particularly evident with hard clots and larger inner diameter catheters.</p>","PeriodicalId":520730,"journal":{"name":"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: Experiments have shown that 60-cc syringes generate stronger vacuum forces than mechanical pumps. However, few studies have measured catheter tip suction pressure during thrombus engagement. Therefore, this study aimed to compare aspiration forces and pressure drops, generated by mechanical pumps and 60-cc syringes connected to various catheters when aspirating synthetic clots in a 3-dimensional-printed model.
Methods: The system includes a programmable pulsatile pump, a 3-dimensional-printed tissue-matched circle of Willis model, radiopaque synthetic blood clots positioned in the left internal carotid artery terminus, and pressure recording at 500 ± 10% mL/min and 120/80 ± 10 mm Hg. Each catheter underwent 3 soft and hard clot removal trials using a 60-cc syringe and an aspiration pump. Aspiration source pressure was recorded before, during, and after aspiration. The evaluated variables included engagement pressure change (∆Pengagement), aspiration pressure drops (∆Paspiration), and pressure efficiency (PE), defined as the percentage of peak pressure maintained during aspiration.
Results: Aspirating soft clots with syringes showed low engagement pressure drops (∆Pengagement) (0-14 mm Hg), high PE at 93%-99% of Pp, and minimal aspiration pressure drops (∆Paspiration) (6F catheters: 4-8 mm Hg, 8F catheters: 19 mm Hg). Conversely, using a pump generated moderate ∆Pengagement (6F: 16-51 mm Hg, 8F: 122 mm Hg), lower PE (69%-93% of Pp), and greater ∆Paspiration (6F: 143-151 mm Hg, 8F: 270 mm Hg). For hard clots, syringes exhibited minimal ∆Pengagement and ∆Paspiration (4-13 mm Hg and 3-12 mm Hg, respectively), whereas pumps showed moderate ∆Pengagement (2-34 mm Hg) and large ∆Paspiration (6F: 82-162 mm Hg, 8F: 280 mm Hg).
Conclusion: Syringe aspiration generates higher vacuum pressures and smaller pressure drops than aspiration pumps, likely because of vacuum tubing resistance in aspiration pumps. This effect is particularly evident with hard clots and larger inner diameter catheters.
背景和目的:实验表明,60cc注射器产生比机械泵更强的真空力。然而,很少有研究测量血栓接合时导管尖端的吸入压力。因此,本研究旨在比较在三维打印模型中吸入合成血块时,机械泵和连接不同导管的60cc注射器产生的吸入力和压降。方法:该系统包括一个可编程的脉冲泵,一个三维打印的组织匹配的威利斯圆模型,在左颈内动脉末端放置不透放线的合成血凝块,记录500±10% mL/min和120/80±10 mm Hg的压力。每根导管分别使用60cc注射器和抽吸泵进行3次软硬血凝块清除试验。在抽吸前、抽吸中、抽吸后分别记录抽吸源压力。评估的变量包括吸入压力变化(∆Pengagement)、吸入压力下降(∆p抱负)和压力效率(PE), PE定义为吸入过程中保持峰值压力的百分比。结果:用注射器吸入软凝块,接触压降(∆Pengagement)低(0 ~ 14 mm Hg), PE高(93% ~ 99% Pp),吸出压降(∆p吸)最小(6F导管:4 ~ 8 mm Hg, 8F导管:19 mm Hg)。相反,使用泵产生适度的∆Pengagement (6F: 16-51毫米汞柱,8F: 122毫米汞柱),较低的PE (Pp的69%-93%)和较大的∆Pengagement (6F: 143-151毫米汞柱,8F: 270毫米汞柱)。对于硬血块,注射器表现出最小的∆p接合和∆p接合(分别为4-13 mm Hg和3-12 mm Hg),而泵表现出中等的∆p接合(2-34 mm Hg)和大的∆p接合(6F: 82-162 mm Hg, 8F: 280 mm Hg)。结论:与抽吸泵相比,注射器抽吸产生的真空压力更高,压降更小,可能是由于抽吸泵中的真空管阻力所致。这种效果在硬血块和内径较大的导管中尤为明显。