Why are RCTs the Gold Standard? The Epistemological Difference Between Randomized Experiments and Observational Studies.

Observational studies Pub Date : 2025-04-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1353/obs.2025.a956840
Christopher Harshaw
{"title":"Why are RCTs the Gold Standard? The Epistemological Difference Between Randomized Experiments and Observational Studies.","authors":"Christopher Harshaw","doi":"10.1353/obs.2025.a956840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In response to Pearl, Aronow et al. (2025) argue that randomized experiments are special among causal inference methods due to their statistical properties. I believe that the key distinction between randomized experiments and observational studies is not statistical, but rather epistemological in nature. In this comment, I aim to articulate this epistemological distinction and argue that it ought to take a more central role in these discussions.</p>","PeriodicalId":74335,"journal":{"name":"Observational studies","volume":"11 1","pages":"41-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12139715/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Observational studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/obs.2025.a956840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In response to Pearl, Aronow et al. (2025) argue that randomized experiments are special among causal inference methods due to their statistical properties. I believe that the key distinction between randomized experiments and observational studies is not statistical, but rather epistemological in nature. In this comment, I aim to articulate this epistemological distinction and argue that it ought to take a more central role in these discussions.

为什么随机对照试验是黄金标准?随机实验与观察性研究的认识论差异。
针对Pearl, Aronow等人(2025)认为随机实验因其统计特性而在因果推理方法中是特殊的。我认为,随机实验和观察性研究之间的关键区别不在于统计,而在于本质上的认识论。在这篇评论中,我的目的是阐明这种认识论上的区别,并认为它应该在这些讨论中发挥更重要的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信