In vitro CSLM evaluation of bonding agents in amalgam restoration replaced with composite resin.

Sayanti Ghosh, Pratima Shenoi, Manjeet Uke, Ankita Niswade
{"title":"<i>In vitro</i> CSLM evaluation of bonding agents in amalgam restoration replaced with composite resin.","authors":"Sayanti Ghosh, Pratima Shenoi, Manjeet Uke, Ankita Niswade","doi":"10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_165_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to analyze the depth of penetration of two different adhesives using Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope in Class I amalgam restorations replaced with composite restorations.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>Eighty freshly extracted human premolars were selected for the study. Samples were randomly divided into four groups (<i>n</i> = 20). Class I cavities were prepared for composite resin restorations the adhesive used in Group Ia: Tetric N-Bond and Group Ib: Tetric N-Bond Universal. For Group II and Group III: Samples were first restored with silver amalgam and removed after 1 year followed by composite resin restoration: Adhesive used in Group II: Tetric N-Bond and Group III: Tetric N-Bond Universal. While using the adhesives each time, they were labeled with 0.1% Rhodamine B dye. After restoring the samples using Te-Econom Plus, they were sectioned with a microtome precision saw. CLSM was used to determine the thickness of the hybrid layer and the number of resin tags.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher values of thickness of hybrid layer and number of resin tags were observed in the control group as compared to the experimental groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A significantly thicker hybrid layer and higher number of resin tags were obtained when a total-etch system was used for replacing old amalgam restoration with composite resin.</p>","PeriodicalId":516842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics","volume":"28 5","pages":"474-480"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12129292/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_165_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to analyze the depth of penetration of two different adhesives using Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope in Class I amalgam restorations replaced with composite restorations.

Subjects and methods: Eighty freshly extracted human premolars were selected for the study. Samples were randomly divided into four groups (n = 20). Class I cavities were prepared for composite resin restorations the adhesive used in Group Ia: Tetric N-Bond and Group Ib: Tetric N-Bond Universal. For Group II and Group III: Samples were first restored with silver amalgam and removed after 1 year followed by composite resin restoration: Adhesive used in Group II: Tetric N-Bond and Group III: Tetric N-Bond Universal. While using the adhesives each time, they were labeled with 0.1% Rhodamine B dye. After restoring the samples using Te-Econom Plus, they were sectioned with a microtome precision saw. CLSM was used to determine the thickness of the hybrid layer and the number of resin tags.

Results: Higher values of thickness of hybrid layer and number of resin tags were observed in the control group as compared to the experimental groups.

Conclusions: A significantly thicker hybrid layer and higher number of resin tags were obtained when a total-etch system was used for replacing old amalgam restoration with composite resin.

复合树脂替代银汞合金修复体粘结剂的体外CSLM评价。
目的:利用激光共聚焦扫描显微镜分析两种不同粘接剂在I类银汞合金修复体替代复合修复体时的渗透深度。对象和方法:选择80颗新鲜拔除的人前磨牙进行研究。样本随机分为4组(n = 20)。制备I类腔体用于复合树脂修复体,并使用Ia组:n -基团和Ib组:n -基团通用型胶粘剂。对于组II和组III:样品首先用银汞合金修复,1年后取出,然后用复合树脂修复。组II使用粘合剂:Tetric N-Bond,组III使用通用型Tetric N-Bond。每次使用粘合剂时,用0.1%罗丹明B染料标记。使用Te-Econom Plus恢复样品后,用切片机精密锯对样品进行切片。CLSM用于确定杂化层的厚度和树脂标签的数量。结果:对照组的杂化层厚度和树脂标签数均高于实验组。结论:采用全蚀刻系统以复合树脂代替旧的银汞合金修复体可获得更厚的杂化层和更多的树脂标签。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信