Clash of Equity, Diversity, Inclusion (EDI) and Anti-Woke-Ism: Reclaiming and Re-Storying EDI for Thriving Communities

Ardavan Eizadirad, Sabreena Ghaffar-Siddiqui
{"title":"Clash of Equity, Diversity, Inclusion (EDI) and Anti-Woke-Ism: Reclaiming and Re-Storying EDI for Thriving Communities","authors":"Ardavan Eizadirad,&nbsp;Sabreena Ghaffar-Siddiqui","doi":"10.1002/dvr2.70032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This commentary examines the evolution of Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) discourses, critiquing its shift from grassroots activism to a performative tool co-opted by institutions and weaponized by politicians. It addresses concerns from the anti-woke backlash and advocates for reframing EDI as a community-driven framework for thriving communities, fostering belonging and engagement, through data-driven decision-making that facilitates transformative systemic change.</p>","PeriodicalId":100379,"journal":{"name":"Diversity & Inclusion Research","volume":"2 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dvr2.70032","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diversity & Inclusion Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dvr2.70032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This commentary examines the evolution of Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) discourses, critiquing its shift from grassroots activism to a performative tool co-opted by institutions and weaponized by politicians. It addresses concerns from the anti-woke backlash and advocates for reframing EDI as a community-driven framework for thriving communities, fostering belonging and engagement, through data-driven decision-making that facilitates transformative systemic change.

公平、多元、包容(EDI)与反觉醒主义的冲突:为繁荣的社区回收和重新讲述EDI
本文考察了平等、多样性和包容(EDI)话语的演变,批评其从基层行动主义转变为机构采用的表演工具,并被政治家武器化。它解决了来自反觉醒反弹的担忧,并倡导将EDI重新定义为一个社区驱动的框架,通过数据驱动的决策促进变革性的系统变革,促进社区繁荣,促进归属感和参与度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信