Progestin-only contraception and thrombosis: An updated systematic review.

Naomi K Tepper, Antoinette T Nguyen, Maura K Whiteman, Kathryn M Curtis
{"title":"Progestin-only contraception and thrombosis: An updated systematic review.","authors":"Naomi K Tepper, Antoinette T Nguyen, Maura K Whiteman, Kathryn M Curtis","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2025.110978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Evidence is limited on whether the use of progestin-only contraception (POC) is associated with the risk of thrombosis. Our objective was to update an earlier systematic review on POC and thrombosis risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched for articles that examined risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) (e.g., deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism) or arterial thromboembolism (ATE) (e.g., myocardial infarction or stroke) among women with thrombogenic conditions or characteristics or in the general population using POC, compared with women using nonhormonal or no contraception, published during February 1, 2016 through November 30, 2022. We also included articles from a previous systematic review, with articles published through January 2016. We assessed quality for each study and certainty of evidence for all outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-three articles met inclusion criteria; one was good quality, 20 were fair quality, and 12 were poor quality. Seven articles were newly identified, and 26 were included in the previous review. Risk of VTE, but not ATE, was generally elevated with depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) use among women with certain thrombogenic conditions or characteristics (e.g., diabetes or postpartum) and women in the general population. Risks of VTE and ATE were generally not elevated with use of other POC, including levonorgestrel intrauterine devices, implants, or progestin-only pills.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evidence suggests that risk of VTE, but not ATE, is increased with DMPA use compared with nonuse among women with certain thrombogenic conditions and women in the general population. Evidence does not suggest increased risk of VTE or ATE with use of other POC. While several studies examined thrombosis risk with POC use and thrombogenic conditions or characteristics, data are limited for individual conditions or characteristics and no evidence was identified for most conditions. The certainty of evidence is low or very low for all outcomes.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Use of DMPA might increase the risk of VTE among women with medical conditions associated with thrombosis and among women in the general population. Evidence does not suggest an increased risk of thrombosis with other POC. Further study is needed on safety of POC use by women with thrombogenic conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":93955,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":" ","pages":"110978"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2025.110978","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Evidence is limited on whether the use of progestin-only contraception (POC) is associated with the risk of thrombosis. Our objective was to update an earlier systematic review on POC and thrombosis risk.

Methods: We searched for articles that examined risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) (e.g., deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism) or arterial thromboembolism (ATE) (e.g., myocardial infarction or stroke) among women with thrombogenic conditions or characteristics or in the general population using POC, compared with women using nonhormonal or no contraception, published during February 1, 2016 through November 30, 2022. We also included articles from a previous systematic review, with articles published through January 2016. We assessed quality for each study and certainty of evidence for all outcomes.

Results: Thirty-three articles met inclusion criteria; one was good quality, 20 were fair quality, and 12 were poor quality. Seven articles were newly identified, and 26 were included in the previous review. Risk of VTE, but not ATE, was generally elevated with depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) use among women with certain thrombogenic conditions or characteristics (e.g., diabetes or postpartum) and women in the general population. Risks of VTE and ATE were generally not elevated with use of other POC, including levonorgestrel intrauterine devices, implants, or progestin-only pills.

Conclusions: Evidence suggests that risk of VTE, but not ATE, is increased with DMPA use compared with nonuse among women with certain thrombogenic conditions and women in the general population. Evidence does not suggest increased risk of VTE or ATE with use of other POC. While several studies examined thrombosis risk with POC use and thrombogenic conditions or characteristics, data are limited for individual conditions or characteristics and no evidence was identified for most conditions. The certainty of evidence is low or very low for all outcomes.

Implications: Use of DMPA might increase the risk of VTE among women with medical conditions associated with thrombosis and among women in the general population. Evidence does not suggest an increased risk of thrombosis with other POC. Further study is needed on safety of POC use by women with thrombogenic conditions.

单孕激素避孕和血栓形成:最新的系统综述。
目的:仅使用孕激素避孕(POC)是否与血栓形成风险相关的证据有限。我们的目的是更新早期关于POC和血栓形成风险的系统综述。方法:我们检索了2016年2月1日至2022年11月30日期间发表的关于在有血栓形成条件或特征的女性中或在使用POC的普通人群中,与使用非激素或无避孕的女性相比,检查静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)(如深静脉血栓形成或肺栓塞)或动脉血栓栓塞(ATE)(如心肌梗死或中风)风险的文章。我们还纳入了之前发表于2016年1月的系统综述文章。我们评估了每项研究的质量和所有结果证据的确定性。结果:33篇文章符合纳入标准;1个质量好,20个质量一般,12个质量差。7篇文章是新发现的,26篇文章被纳入了之前的综述。在具有某些血栓形成条件或特征(如糖尿病或产后)的女性和普通人群中,使用醋酸甲羟孕酮(DMPA)通常会增加静脉血栓栓塞的风险,但不会增加ATE的风险。使用其他POC,包括左炔诺孕酮宫内节育器、植入物或单孕激素药物,通常不会增加静脉血栓栓塞和ATE的风险。结论:有证据表明,与不使用DMPA相比,在具有某些血栓形成条件的女性和普通人群中,使用DMPA会增加静脉血栓栓塞的风险,但不会增加ATE的风险。没有证据表明使用其他POC会增加VTE或ATE的风险。虽然有几项研究调查了POC使用和血栓形成条件或特征的血栓形成风险,但个体条件或特征的数据有限,大多数情况下没有证据。所有结果的证据的确定性都很低或非常低。意义:使用DMPA可能会增加与血栓形成相关的医疗条件的妇女和一般人群中的妇女发生静脉血栓栓塞的风险。没有证据表明其他POC会增加血栓形成的风险。有血栓形成条件的妇女使用POC的安全性需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信