[Analysis of cognitive status in patients with different nosologies and clinical variants of very late manifesting schizophreniform psychosis].

Q3 Medicine
V V Pochueva, I V Kolykhalov
{"title":"[Analysis of cognitive status in patients with different nosologies and clinical variants of very late manifesting schizophreniform psychosis].","authors":"V V Pochueva, I V Kolykhalov","doi":"10.17116/jnevro202512504288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study and compare the features of cognitive functioning in patients with very late-manifesting schizophreniform psychosis (VLMSP) depending on the clinical variants of the disease.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study included 61 patients (58 females, 3 males) aged 63 to 78 years. All patients met the ICD-10 criteria for psychosis and had no signs of dementia. Cognitive performance was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Statistical analysis was performed using non-parametric methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with severe polymorphic psychotic symptoms had the most pronounced cognitive deficit (MMSE on Day 0 was 22.5 [20; 26] points, MoCA on Day 0 was 16 [12; 19] points, <i>p</i><0.05), which partially improved after treatment, but remained below the reference values (MMSE on Day 28 was 24.5 [22; 26] points, MoCA on Day 28 was 18.5 [17; 22] points). In patients with paranoid symptoms, cognitive impairment was less pronounced (MMSE on Day 0 was 26 [24; 28] points, MoCA on Day 0 was 0 [17; 24.5] points) and stable (MMSE on Day 28 was 27 [25.5; 29.5] points, MoCA on Day 28 was 21 [17; 25] points). In the group where affective-delusional symptoms prevailed, the cognitive deficit was minimal (MMSE on Day 0 was 27.5 [27; 28.5] points, MoCA on Day 0 was 24 [23; 26.5] points) and completely reduced after treatment (MMSE on Day 28 was 29 [28; 30] points, MoCA on Day 28 was 26 [25; 28] points).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study showed significant differences in cognitive status in patients with VLMSP depending on the clinical variant of the disease. The results emphasize the need for an individualized approach to diagnosing and treating VLMSP and the importance of monitoring cognitive functions for early detection of neurodegenerative processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":56370,"journal":{"name":"Zhurnal Nevrologii I Psikhiatrii Imeni S S Korsakova","volume":"125 4. Vyp. 2","pages":"88-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhurnal Nevrologii I Psikhiatrii Imeni S S Korsakova","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro202512504288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To study and compare the features of cognitive functioning in patients with very late-manifesting schizophreniform psychosis (VLMSP) depending on the clinical variants of the disease.

Material and methods: The study included 61 patients (58 females, 3 males) aged 63 to 78 years. All patients met the ICD-10 criteria for psychosis and had no signs of dementia. Cognitive performance was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Statistical analysis was performed using non-parametric methods.

Results: Patients with severe polymorphic psychotic symptoms had the most pronounced cognitive deficit (MMSE on Day 0 was 22.5 [20; 26] points, MoCA on Day 0 was 16 [12; 19] points, p<0.05), which partially improved after treatment, but remained below the reference values (MMSE on Day 28 was 24.5 [22; 26] points, MoCA on Day 28 was 18.5 [17; 22] points). In patients with paranoid symptoms, cognitive impairment was less pronounced (MMSE on Day 0 was 26 [24; 28] points, MoCA on Day 0 was 0 [17; 24.5] points) and stable (MMSE on Day 28 was 27 [25.5; 29.5] points, MoCA on Day 28 was 21 [17; 25] points). In the group where affective-delusional symptoms prevailed, the cognitive deficit was minimal (MMSE on Day 0 was 27.5 [27; 28.5] points, MoCA on Day 0 was 24 [23; 26.5] points) and completely reduced after treatment (MMSE on Day 28 was 29 [28; 30] points, MoCA on Day 28 was 26 [25; 28] points).

Conclusion: The study showed significant differences in cognitive status in patients with VLMSP depending on the clinical variant of the disease. The results emphasize the need for an individualized approach to diagnosing and treating VLMSP and the importance of monitoring cognitive functions for early detection of neurodegenerative processes.

【非常晚期表现的精神分裂症样精神病不同病种及临床变异患者的认知状况分析】。
目的:研究和比较极晚表现精神分裂样精神病(VLMSP)患者不同临床变型的认知功能特征。材料与方法:纳入61例患者,其中女性58例,男性3例,年龄63 ~ 78岁。所有患者均符合ICD-10精神病标准,且无痴呆症状。采用蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)评分和简易精神状态检查(MMSE)评估认知表现。采用非参数方法进行统计分析。结果:有严重多态精神病症状的患者有最明显的认知缺陷(第0天MMSE为22.5 [20;第0天MoCA为16 [12;[19]结论:研究显示,VLMSP患者的认知状态因疾病的临床变异而有显著差异。结果强调需要个性化的方法来诊断和治疗VLMSP,以及监测认知功能对早期发现神经退行性过程的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
287
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Одно из старейших медицинских изданий России, основанное в 1901 году. Создание журнала связано с именами выдающихся деятелей отечественной медицины, вошедших в историю мировой психиатрии и неврологии, – С.С. Корсакова и А.Я. Кожевникова. Широкий диапазон предлагаемых журналом материалов и разнообразие форм их представления привлекают внимание научных работников и врачей, опытных и начинающих медиков, причем не только неврологов и психиатров, но и специалистов смежных областей медицины.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信