[Change of subjective cognitive decline in first-degree relatives of patients with Alzheimer's disease: results of a 15-year prospective study].

Q3 Medicine
N D Selezneva, I F Roshchina, I V Kolykhalov, S I Gavrilova
{"title":"[Change of subjective cognitive decline in first-degree relatives of patients with Alzheimer's disease: results of a 15-year prospective study].","authors":"N D Selezneva, I F Roshchina, I V Kolykhalov, S I Gavrilova","doi":"10.17116/jnevro202512504236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the change of cognitive functioning for 15 years in non-treated first-degree relatives of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) with symptoms of memory loss.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The observation cohort included 66 relatives of the first-degree relatives of patients with AD (Centre For Mental Health Research) with subjective cognitive decline (SCD), who agreed to a routine psychometric and in-depth neuropsychological examination and subsequent participation in the prolonged observation program but refused to use any drug therapy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An open-label 15-year observational study of the change of cognitive functioning in first-degree relatives of AD patients with symptoms of memory loss (SCD) was conducted. The baseline indicators of cognitive functioning of the study were compared with similar indicators after 5, 10, and 15 years. For psychometric assessment, routine psychometric scales and tests were used (Mini-Mental State Examination; the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test; a Clock Drawing test, a scale of general deterioration; a test of random memorization of 10 words; the Boston naming test; subtest 6 of the Wechsler test; a test of memorizing 5 geometric shapes; the Benton test; the subtest sound and categorical associations, and the G. Münsterberg test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A prospective study of a cohort of first-degree relatives of AD patients with symptoms of cognitive dysfunction showed a high risk of subsequent cognitive deterioration up to dementia. After 5 years of observation, 16.7% of subjects developed mild cognitive impairment (mci) syndrome. By year 10 of the study, mci syndrome was diagnosed in 42.4% of subjects, and in 7.6%, AD was diagnosed; in 50.0% of subjects, the initial condition did not worsen. By year 15 of observation, 30.3% of patients were diagnosed with dementia in AD and 34.85% with mci syndrome; in 34.85% of cases, the condition remained at the SCD level.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of a 15-year cognitive study in first-degree relatives of AD patients with SCD who did not receive prophylactic therapy showed a significant decrease in cognitive functioning parameters with a quite high conversion rate to MCI and/or to dementia in ad. Subsequent analysis of a complex of demographic, clinical, neuropsychological, and other risk factors for dementia due to ad contributes to determining the hereditary risk of SCD progression and developing personalized approaches to the prevention of dementia in individuals with a genetic risk of AD.</p>","PeriodicalId":56370,"journal":{"name":"Zhurnal Nevrologii I Psikhiatrii Imeni S S Korsakova","volume":"125 4. Vyp. 2","pages":"36-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhurnal Nevrologii I Psikhiatrii Imeni S S Korsakova","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro202512504236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the change of cognitive functioning for 15 years in non-treated first-degree relatives of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) with symptoms of memory loss.

Material and methods: The observation cohort included 66 relatives of the first-degree relatives of patients with AD (Centre For Mental Health Research) with subjective cognitive decline (SCD), who agreed to a routine psychometric and in-depth neuropsychological examination and subsequent participation in the prolonged observation program but refused to use any drug therapy.

Materials and methods: An open-label 15-year observational study of the change of cognitive functioning in first-degree relatives of AD patients with symptoms of memory loss (SCD) was conducted. The baseline indicators of cognitive functioning of the study were compared with similar indicators after 5, 10, and 15 years. For psychometric assessment, routine psychometric scales and tests were used (Mini-Mental State Examination; the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test; a Clock Drawing test, a scale of general deterioration; a test of random memorization of 10 words; the Boston naming test; subtest 6 of the Wechsler test; a test of memorizing 5 geometric shapes; the Benton test; the subtest sound and categorical associations, and the G. Münsterberg test.

Results: A prospective study of a cohort of first-degree relatives of AD patients with symptoms of cognitive dysfunction showed a high risk of subsequent cognitive deterioration up to dementia. After 5 years of observation, 16.7% of subjects developed mild cognitive impairment (mci) syndrome. By year 10 of the study, mci syndrome was diagnosed in 42.4% of subjects, and in 7.6%, AD was diagnosed; in 50.0% of subjects, the initial condition did not worsen. By year 15 of observation, 30.3% of patients were diagnosed with dementia in AD and 34.85% with mci syndrome; in 34.85% of cases, the condition remained at the SCD level.

Conclusion: The results of a 15-year cognitive study in first-degree relatives of AD patients with SCD who did not receive prophylactic therapy showed a significant decrease in cognitive functioning parameters with a quite high conversion rate to MCI and/or to dementia in ad. Subsequent analysis of a complex of demographic, clinical, neuropsychological, and other risk factors for dementia due to ad contributes to determining the hereditary risk of SCD progression and developing personalized approaches to the prevention of dementia in individuals with a genetic risk of AD.

[阿尔茨海默病患者一级亲属主观认知能力下降的变化:一项15年前瞻性研究的结果]。
目的:评价有记忆丧失症状的阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者15年未治疗的一级亲属的认知功能变化。材料和方法:观察队列包括66名主观认知能力下降(SCD) AD (Centre For Mental Health Research)患者一级亲属的亲属,他们同意接受常规心理测量和深度神经心理学检查,随后参与长期观察计划,但拒绝使用任何药物治疗。材料与方法:对伴有记忆丧失(SCD)症状的AD患者一级亲属的认知功能变化进行了一项为期15年的开放标签观察研究。研究的认知功能基线指标在5年、10年和15年后与类似指标进行比较。对于心理测量评估,使用常规心理测量量表和测试(迷你精神状态检查;蒙特利尔认知评估测验;一次钟图测试,一次标度一般变质;随机记忆10个单词的测试;波士顿命名测验;韦氏测验子测试6;记忆5个几何形状的测试;本顿测验;语音和分类关联子测试和G. m nsterberg测试。结果:一项对有认知功能障碍症状的AD患者一级亲属队列的前瞻性研究显示,随后认知功能恶化直至痴呆的风险很高。经过5年的观察,16.7%的受试者出现轻度认知障碍(mci)综合征。到研究的第10年,42.4%的受试者被诊断为mci综合征,7.6%的受试者被诊断为AD;在50.0%的受试者中,初始状况没有恶化。观察第15年时,30.3%的患者诊断为AD痴呆,34.85%的患者诊断为mci综合征;34.85%的病例病情维持在SCD水平。结论:对未接受预防性治疗的AD合并SCD的一级亲属进行的一项为期15年的认知研究结果显示,AD患者的认知功能参数显著下降,且向MCI和/或痴呆的转化率相当高。随后对阿尔茨海默病引起的痴呆的人口学、临床、神经心理学和其他危险因素的复杂分析有助于确定SCD进展的遗传风险,并制定个性化的方法来预防阿尔茨海默病遗传风险个体的痴呆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
287
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Одно из старейших медицинских изданий России, основанное в 1901 году. Создание журнала связано с именами выдающихся деятелей отечественной медицины, вошедших в историю мировой психиатрии и неврологии, – С.С. Корсакова и А.Я. Кожевникова. Широкий диапазон предлагаемых журналом материалов и разнообразие форм их представления привлекают внимание научных работников и врачей, опытных и начинающих медиков, причем не только неврологов и психиатров, но и специалистов смежных областей медицины.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信