RealMedQA: A pilot biomedical question answering dataset containing realistic clinical questions.

AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium Pub Date : 2025-05-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01
Gregory Kell, Angus Roberts, Serge Umansky, Yuti Khare, Najma Ahmed, Nikhil Patel, Chloe Simela, Jack Coumbe, Julian Rozario, Ryan-Rhys Griffiths, Iain J Marshall
{"title":"RealMedQA: A pilot biomedical question answering dataset containing realistic clinical questions.","authors":"Gregory Kell, Angus Roberts, Serge Umansky, Yuti Khare, Najma Ahmed, Nikhil Patel, Chloe Simela, Jack Coumbe, Julian Rozario, Ryan-Rhys Griffiths, Iain J Marshall","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical question answering systems have the potential to provide clinicians with relevant and timely answers to their questions. Nonetheless, despite the advances that have been made, adoption of these systems in clinical settings has been slow. One issue is a lack of question-answering datasets which reflect the real-world needs of health professionals. In this work, we present RealMedQA, a dataset of realistic clinical questions generated by humans and an LLM. We describe the process for generating and verifying the QA pairs and assess several QA models on BioASQ and RealMedQA to assess the relative difficulty of matching answers to questions. We show that the LLM is more cost-efficient for generating \"ideal\" QA pairs. Additionally, we achieve a lower lexical similarity between questions and answers than BioASQ which provides an additional challenge to the top two QA models, as per the results. We release our code and our dataset publicly to encourage further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":72180,"journal":{"name":"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium","volume":"2024 ","pages":"590-599"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12099375/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical question answering systems have the potential to provide clinicians with relevant and timely answers to their questions. Nonetheless, despite the advances that have been made, adoption of these systems in clinical settings has been slow. One issue is a lack of question-answering datasets which reflect the real-world needs of health professionals. In this work, we present RealMedQA, a dataset of realistic clinical questions generated by humans and an LLM. We describe the process for generating and verifying the QA pairs and assess several QA models on BioASQ and RealMedQA to assess the relative difficulty of matching answers to questions. We show that the LLM is more cost-efficient for generating "ideal" QA pairs. Additionally, we achieve a lower lexical similarity between questions and answers than BioASQ which provides an additional challenge to the top two QA models, as per the results. We release our code and our dataset publicly to encourage further research.

RealMedQA:一个试验性的生物医学问题回答数据集,包含现实的临床问题。
临床问答系统有可能为临床医生提供相关和及时的问题答案。然而,尽管取得了进展,但在临床环境中采用这些系统的速度很慢。一个问题是缺乏反映现实世界卫生专业人员需求的问答数据集。在这项工作中,我们提出了RealMedQA,这是一个由人类和法学硕士生成的现实临床问题的数据集。我们描述了生成和验证QA对的过程,并在BioASQ和RealMedQA上评估了几个QA模型,以评估匹配问题答案的相对难度。我们证明了LLM在生成“理想”QA对方面更具成本效益。此外,根据结果,我们实现了比BioASQ更低的问题和答案之间的词汇相似性,这为前两个QA模型提供了额外的挑战。我们公开发布代码和数据集,以鼓励进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信